Abstract
Surface-sterilised seeds of Lens culinaris cv. Pusa-6 were soaked in 0 M, 10−6 M, 10−8 M or 10−10 M aqueous solutions of 28-homobrassinolide (HBR) for 4 h, 8 h or 12 h and planted in the field in a sandy loam soil. Plants were sampled 60, 90 and 120 days after sowing (DAS). Soaking with HBR decreased root length and nodule number per plant but increased nitrate reductase activity (E.C.1.6.6.1). Soaking with HBR also increased grain yield at the final harvest 140 DAS. The greatest increase was obtained with an HBR concentration of 10−8 M.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Soaking lentil seeds with HBR decreased root length relative to unsoaked controls.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarise1 - Treatment
- Soaking with HBRe0
- Outcome
- root lengthe0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- 0 Me1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Soaking with HBR decreased root length and nodule number per plant”
e1“Surface-sterilised seeds of Lens culinaris cv. Pusa-6 were soaked in 0 M, 10−6 M, 10−8 M or 10−10 M aqueous solutions of 28-homobrassinolide (HBR)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soaking lentil seeds with HBR decreased nodule number per plant relative to unsoaked controls.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarise1 - Treatment
- Soaking with HBRe0
- Outcome
- nodule number per plante0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- 0 Me1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Soaking with HBR decreased root length and nodule number per plant”
e1“Surface-sterilised seeds of Lens culinaris cv. Pusa-6 were soaked in 0 M, 10−6 M, 10−8 M or 10−10 M aqueous solutions of 28-homobrassinolide (HBR)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soaking lentil seeds with HBR increased nitrate reductase activity relative to unsoaked controls.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarise1 - Treatment
- Soaking with HBRe0
- Gene
- nitrate reductasee0
- Outcome
- nitrate reductase activitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- 0 Me1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Soaking with HBR decreased root length and nodule number per plant but increased nitrate reductase activity (E.C.1.6.6.1)”
e1“Surface-sterilised seeds of Lens culinaris cv. Pusa-6 were soaked in 0 M, 10−6 M, 10−8 M or 10−10 M aqueous solutions of 28-homobrassinolide (HBR)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soaking lentil seeds with HBR increased grain yield at 140 days after sowing.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarise1 - Treatment
- Soaking with HBRe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- 140 DASe0
- Comparator
- 0 Me1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Soaking with HBR also increased grain yield at the final harvest 140 DAS”
e1“Surface-sterilised seeds of Lens culinaris cv. Pusa-6 were soaked in 0 M, 10−6 M, 10−8 M or 10−10 M aqueous solutions of 28-homobrassinolide (HBR)”
Claim · model-written summary
The greatest yield increase followed soaking at an HBR concentration of 10−8 M.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarise2 - Treatment
- HBR concentration of 10−8 Me0
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- greatest increasee0
- Comparator
- 0 Me2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The greatest increase was obtained with an HBR concentration of 10−8 M”
e1“Soaking with HBR also increased grain yield at the final harvest 140 DAS”
e2“Surface-sterilised seeds of Lens culinaris cv. Pusa-6 were soaked in 0 M, 10−6 M, 10−8 M or 10−10 M aqueous solutions of 28-homobrassinolide (HBR)”
The same questions in other papers
application · physiology: enzyme activity · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →application · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →application · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →application · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.