Abstract
The potency of soaking in digested or stock jellyfish on germination of wheat (Triticum aestivium) and lentil (Lens culinaris) seeds was studied. Also, the photosynthetic pigments, ultrastructure of leaves and minerals in the produced seedling were estimated. The results revealed that soaking seeds in digested jellyfish solution recorded the highest germination capacity and germination rate in lentil seeds. Also, improves seedlings height, number of leaves and fresh weight of the produced seedlings than those from soaked in stock jellyfish or in water. Soaking lentil seeds in stock or digested jellyfish mostly increased chlorophyll a, b and carotenoisds, contrarwisewashappened in wheat seedlings as compared to control values. A great variation in microelements and heavy metals in dry matter of seedlings that were produced from seeds soaked either in stock or digested solution of jellyfish. Some elements increased another decreased and some disappeared in both wheat and lentil seedlings. Also, the ultrastructural examination by transmission electron microscopy of seven days old wheat or lentil leaf revealed no abnormalities but some organelles as ribosomes, vesicle rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum are higher in micrograph.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Soaking lentil seeds in digested jellyfish solution gave the highest germination capacity and germination rate.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise1 - Treatment
- soaking seeds in digested jellyfish solutione1
- Outcome
- germination capacity and germination ratee1
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The results revealed that soaking seeds in digested jellyfish solution recorded the highest germination capacity and germination rate in lentil seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Seedlings from jellyfish-digest soaking had improved height, leaf number and fresh weight compared with stock jellyfish or water.
- Taxon
- wheat and lentil
Lens culinaris
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- digested jellyfishe1
- Outcome
- seedlings height, number of leaves and fresh weighte2
- Direction
- improvese2
- Comparator
- stock jellyfish or in watere2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e1“soaking seeds in digested jellyfish solution”
e2“Also, improves seedlings height, number of leaves and fresh weight of the produced seedlings than those from soaked in stock jellyfish or in water”
t0“wheat and lentil seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Soaking lentil seeds in stock or digested jellyfish mostly increased chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise3 - Treatment
- stock or digested jellyfishe3
- Outcome
- chlorophyll a, b and carotenoisdse3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Qualifier
- mostlye3
- Comparator
- control valuese3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“Soaking lentil seeds in stock or digested jellyfish mostly increased chlorophyll a, b and carotenoisds, contrarwisewashappened in wheat seedlings as compared to control values”
Claim · model-written summary
In wheat seedlings the chlorophyll a, b and carotenoid response to jellyfish soaking was the opposite of lentil, i.e. a decrease relative to control values.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume3 - Treatment
- stock or digested jellyfishe3
- Outcome
- chlorophyll a, b and carotenoisdse3
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede3
- Comparator
- control valuese3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“Soaking lentil seeds in stock or digested jellyfish mostly increased chlorophyll a, b and carotenoisds, contrarwisewashappened in wheat seedlings as compared to control values”
Claim · model-written summary
Seedlings from jellyfish-soaked seeds showed a great variation in microelements and heavy metals, with some elements increased, some decreased and some disappeared.
- Taxon
- wheat and lentil
Lens culinaris
Triticum aestivume5 - Treatment
- seeds soaked either in stock or digested solution of jellyfishe4
- Outcome
- microelements and heavy metals in dry mattere4
- Qualifier
- Some elements increased another decreased and some disappearede5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e4“A great variation in microelements and heavy metals in dry matter of seedlings that were produced from seeds soaked either in stock or digested solution of jellyfish”
e5“Some elements increased another decreased and some disappeared in both wheat and lentil seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf ultrastructure of seven-day-old wheat or lentil seedlings showed no abnormalities.
- Taxon
- wheat or lentil
Lens culinaris
Triticum aestivume6 - Organ / stage
- seven days olde6
- Outcome
- abnormalitiese6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e6“seven days old wheat or lentil leaf revealed no abnormalities”
Claim · model-written summary
Some organelles, including ribosomes and rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum, were higher in the micrographs of wheat and lentil leaves.
- Taxon
- wheat and lentil
Lens culinaris
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- ribosomes, vesicle rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulume7
- Direction
- highere7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e7“some organelles as ribosomes, vesicle rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum are higher in micrograph”
t0“wheat and lentil seedlings”
The same questions in other papers
application · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.