Paper · 2015 · Plant Soil and Environment

Yield and quality traits of two linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) cultivars as affected by some agronomic factors

S. Andruszczak; U. Gawlik-Dziki; P. Kraska; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on rendzina soil in the years 2010-2012. The seeds of two linseed cultivars (Szafir and Oliwin) were sown at row spacing of 15 cm and 25 cm. Three agrotechnical levels in different nitrogen doses and with or without application of herbicides were used. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of row spacing on yield, seed protein and oil content of two linseed cultivars grown under different conditions of mineral fertilization and chemical weed control. Results showed that cv. Szafir was characterized by significantly higher seed yield (on average by 20.2%) and protein content (by 2.6%) while cv. Oliwin had higher content of oil (by 4.9%). Intensive technology of cultivation (80 kg N/ha, Linurex 50 WP, Fusilade Forte 150 EC, Glean 75 WP), compared to the economical technology (40 kg N/ha, without herbicides), significantly increased the seed yield of both linseed cultivars (on average by 80-102%). This was due to higher plant density, higher number of branches, and higher number of capsules per plant. The intensive technology of cultivation had a beneficial effect on the content of α-linolenic acid in linseed seed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Szafir had 2.6% higher seed protein content than Oliwin.

Taxon
linseedt0
Material
Szafire1
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.6%e0
Comparator
Oliwine0

Verbatim

e0

“protein content (by 2.6%) while cv. Oliwin had higher content of oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“cv. Szafir was characterized by significantly higher seed yield (on average by 20.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–609 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oliwin had 4.9% higher oil content than Szafir.

Taxon
linseedt0
Material
Oliwine0
Outcome
content of oile0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.9%e0
Comparator
Szafire1

Verbatim

e0

“cv. Oliwin had higher content of oil (by 4.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“two linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) cultivars as affected by some agronomic factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“cv. Szafir was characterized by significantly higher seed yield (on average by 20.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive cultivation increased seed yield of both linseed cultivars by 80–102% relative to economical cultivation.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
Intensive technology of cultivation (80 kg N/ha, Linurex 50 WP, Fusilade Forte 150 EC, Glean 75 WP)e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
80-102%e0
Comparator
economical technology (40 kg N/ha, without herbicides)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Intensive technology of cultivation (80 kg N/ha, Linurex 50 WP, Fusilade Forte 150 EC, Glean 75 WP), compared to the economical technology (40 kg N/ha, without herbicides), significantly increased the seed yield of both linseed cultivars (on average by 80-102%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive cultivation increased plant density.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
some agronomic factorst0
Outcome
plant densitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This was due to higher plant density, higher number of branches, and higher number of capsules per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“two linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) cultivars as affected by some agronomic factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive cultivation increased the number of branches and capsules per plant.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
some agronomic factorst0
Outcome
number of branches, and higher number of capsules per plante0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher number of branches, and higher number of capsules per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“two linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) cultivars as affected by some agronomic factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive cultivation benefited α-linolenic acid content in linseed seed.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
intensive technology of cultivatione0
Outcome
content of α-linolenic acide0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The intensive technology of cultivation had a beneficial effect on the content of α-linolenic acid in linseed seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1177 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results differ

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.