Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Yield, quality and economics of FCV tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) in relation to preceding crops and nitrogen fertilization in Vertisols

S. KASTURI KRISHNA; S.V. KRISHNA REDDY; K. DEO SINGH; et al.

16
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2001 -02 and 2002-03 at Rajahmundry in Andhra Pradesh with six treatments during rainy (kharif) season, viz. blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper], rice (Oryza sativa L.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], maize (Zea mays L.), green-leaf manuring with pillipesara [Vigna trilobata (L.) Verdc.] and fallow; and three N levels of 30, 45 and 60 kg Nlha, applied to FCV tobacco in winter (rabi) season. Short-duration maize and rice could successfully be grown before rabi tobacco, taking advantage of south-west monsoon rains. Among the cropping systems, green-leaf manuring-tobacco recorded significantly higher cured leaf (1.92 tlha), bright leaf (0.88 tlha) and grade index (1.39) of tobacco followed by fallow - tobacco, whereas lowest values of these yields were recorded in soybean-tobacco. Application of 60 kg Nlha offered significantly higher cured-leaf yield and grade index, and was comparable with that of 45 kg Nlha in respect of bright-leaf yield. Interaction effects of cropping systems and N levels revealed that FCV tobacco preceded by maize, blackgram, rice and soybean re- sponded up to 45 kg Nlha, whereas tobacco preceded by green leaf manuring and fallow responded up to 60 kg Nlha in the production of bright leaf. Maize - tobacco system recorded higher tobacco leaf-equivalent yield (2.25 tl ha). The chemical quality parameters of leaf like reducing sugars, nicotine and chlorides were within the accept- able range. Maize - tobacco and green leaf manuring - tobacco systems recorded higher net returns, whereas benefit : cost ratio was higher with green leaf manuring-tobacco and fallow-tobacco. Minimum broomrape (Orobanche cernua Loefl] infestation of 1.75% was recorded in FCV tobacco succeeding maize. It was concluded that maize - tobacoo accrued higher monetary returns, followed by green leaf manuring-tobacco system compared with fallow - tobacco.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-leaf manuring before tobacco gave significantly higher cured leaf yield (1.92 t/ha) than fallow-tobacco.

Treatment
green-leaf manuringe1
Outcome
cured leafe1
Direction
highere1
Value
1.92 tlhae1
Comparator
fallow - tobaccoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“green-leaf manuring-tobacco recorded significantly higher cured leaf (1.92 tlha), bright leaf (0.88 tlha) and grade index (1.39) of tobacco followed by fallow - tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-leaf manuring before tobacco gave significantly higher bright leaf yield (0.88 t/ha) than fallow-tobacco.

Treatment
green-leaf manuringe1
Outcome
bright leafe1
Direction
highere1
Value
0.88 tlhae1
Comparator
fallow - tobaccoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“green-leaf manuring-tobacco recorded significantly higher cured leaf (1.92 tlha), bright leaf (0.88 tlha) and grade index (1.39) of tobacco followed by fallow - tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-leaf manuring before tobacco gave significantly higher grade index (1.39) than fallow-tobacco.

Treatment
green-leaf manuringe1
Outcome
grade indexe1
Direction
highere1
Value
1.39e1
Comparator
fallow - tobaccoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“green-leaf manuring-tobacco recorded significantly higher cured leaf (1.92 tlha), bright leaf (0.88 tlha) and grade index (1.39) of tobacco followed by fallow - tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco after soybean had the lowest yield values among the preceding crops.

Treatment
soybeane2
Outcome
values of these yieldse2
Direction
loweste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“whereas lowest values of these yields were recorded in soybean-tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg N/ha significantly increased cured-leaf yield and grade index of FCV tobacco.

Taxon
FCV tobaccoe4
Treatment
60 kg Nlhae3
Outcome
cured-leaf yield and grade indexe3
Direction
highere3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“Application of 60 kg Nlha offered significantly higher cured-leaf yield and grade index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–919 · show in text ↑
e4

“applied to FCV tobacco in winter (rabi) season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg N/ha gave bright-leaf yield of FCV tobacco comparable with 45 kg N/ha.

Taxon
FCV tobaccoe4
Treatment
60 kg Nlhae3
Outcome
bright-leaf yielde5
Direction
comparablee5
Comparator
45 kg Nlhae5

Verbatim

e3

“Application of 60 kg Nlha offered significantly higher cured-leaf yield and grade index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–919 · show in text ↑
e4

“applied to FCV tobacco in winter (rabi) season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–435 · show in text ↑
e5

“was comparable with that of 45 kg Nlha in respect of bright-leaf yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FCV tobacco preceded by maize, blackgram, rice and soybean responded to N up to 45 kg/ha in bright leaf production.

Taxon
FCV tobaccoe6
Treatment
preceded by maize, blackgram, rice and soybeane6
Outcome
production of bright leafe6
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Qualifier
up to 45 kg Nlhae6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e6

“FCV tobacco preceded by maize, blackgram, rice and soybean re- sponded up to 45 kg Nlha, whereas tobacco preceded by green leaf manuring and fallow responded up to 60 kg Nlha in the production of bright leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco preceded by green leaf manuring and fallow responded to N up to 60 kg/ha in bright leaf production.

Taxon
FCV tobaccoe6
Treatment
preceded by green leaf manuring and fallowe6
Outcome
production of bright leafe6
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Qualifier
up to 60 kg Nlhae6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e6

“FCV tobacco preceded by maize, blackgram, rice and soybean re- sponded up to 45 kg Nlha, whereas tobacco preceded by green leaf manuring and fallow responded up to 60 kg Nlha in the production of bright leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize - tobacco system recorded higher tobacco leaf-equivalent yield (2.25 t/ha).

Treatment
Maize - tobaccoe7
Outcome
tobacco leaf-equivalent yielde7
Direction
highere7
Value
2.25 tl hae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Maize - tobacco system recorded higher tobacco leaf-equivalent yield (2.25 tl ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1354 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical quality parameters of FCV tobacco leaf (reducing sugars, nicotine and chlorides) were within the acceptable range.

Taxon
FCV tobaccoe4
Outcome
chemical quality parameters of leafe5
Qualifier
reducing sugars, nicotine and chloridese5

Verbatim

e4

“applied to FCV tobacco in winter (rabi) season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–435 · show in text ↑
e5

“The chemical quality parameters of leaf like reducing sugars, nicotine and chlorides were within the accept- able range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize - tobacco system gave higher net returns than the other systems.

Treatment
Maize - tobaccoe6
Outcome
net returnse6
Direction
highere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Maize - tobacco and green leaf manuring-tobacco systems recorded higher net returns”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1477–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green leaf manuring-tobacco system gave higher net returns than the other systems.

Treatment
green leaf manuringe6
Outcome
net returnse6
Direction
highere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Maize - tobacco and green leaf manuring-tobacco systems recorded higher net returns”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1477–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit : cost ratio was higher with green leaf manuring-tobacco.

Treatment
green leaf manuringe7
Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe7
Direction
highere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“whereas benefit : cost ratio was higher with green leaf manuring-tobacco and fallow-tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit : cost ratio was higher with fallow-tobacco.

Treatment
fallowe7
Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe7
Direction
highere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“whereas benefit : cost ratio was higher with green leaf manuring-tobacco and fallow-tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco succeeding maize had the minimum broomrape (Orobanche cernua) infestation of 1.75%.

Taxon
FCV tobaccoe0
Treatment
succeeding maizee0
Interactor
Orobanche cernuaOrobanche cernuae0parasite
Outcome
broomrape (Orobanche cernua Loefl] infestatione0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
1.75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Orobanche cernua
Orobanche cernua · InteractorMikhail Nevsky · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum broomrape (Orobanche cernua Loefl] infestation of 1.75% was recorded in FCV tobacco succeeding maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1765 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-duration maize and rice could successfully be grown before rabi tobacco.

Taxon
maize and riceOryza sativaZea mayse1
Outcome
could successfully be growne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Short-duration maize and rice could successfully be grown before rabi tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–514 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Zea mays · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 187 positive, 27 negative or no effect

186 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.