Abstract
SummaryThe effects of chitosan coatings (1.0% and 2.0% w/v) in controlling the decay of strawberries and raspberries and maintaining their quality were investigated. A chitosan coating significantly reduced the decay of berries stored at 13°C and induced a significant increase of chitinase and β-l,3-glucanase activities of the berries as compared with the controls. Chitosan coating proved almost as effective as the fungicide TBZ in controlling the decay of berries stored at 13°C caused by Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus sp. Chitosan coating had beneficial effects on firmness, titratable acidity, vitamin C content, and anthocyanin content of strawberries and raspberries stored at 4°C.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Chitosan coating significantly reduced decay of berries stored at 13°C compared with controls.
Verbatim
e0“The effects of chitosan coatings (1.0% and 2.0% w/v) in controlling the decay of strawberries and raspberries”
e1“A chitosan coating significantly reduced the decay of berries stored at 13°C”
e2“induced a significant increase of chitinase and β-l,3-glucanase activities of the berries as compared with the controls”
Claim · model-written summary
Chitosan coating increased chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase activities of berries compared with controls.
Verbatim
e0“The effects of chitosan coatings (1.0% and 2.0% w/v) in controlling the decay of strawberries and raspberries”
e1“A chitosan coating significantly reduced the decay of berries stored at 13°C”
e2“induced a significant increase of chitinase and β-l,3-glucanase activities of the berries as compared with the controls”
Claim · model-written summary
Chitosan coating was almost as effective as the fungicide TBZ in controlling decay of berries caused by Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus sp. at 13°C.
- Taxon
- strawberries and raspberriese0
- Treatment
- Chitosan coatinge3
- Interactor
- Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinereae3pathogen - Outcome
- decaye3
- Direction
- almost as effectivee3
- Comparator
- fungicide TBZe3
- Setting
- stored at 13°Ce3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_spores%2C_which_is_green_using_Light_Microscope%2C_Normal_image_without_any_coloring_or_processing_By_researcher_El_sayed_Al_gayar%2C_Faculty_of_Agriculture_Damietta_University.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The effects of chitosan coatings (1.0% and 2.0% w/v) in controlling the decay of strawberries and raspberries”
e3“Chitosan coating proved almost as effective as the fungicide TBZ in controlling the decay of berries stored at 13°C caused by Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus sp.”
Claim · model-written summary
Chitosan coating had beneficial effects on firmness, titratable acidity and vitamin C content of berries stored at 4°C.
- Taxon
- strawberries and raspberriese0
- Treatment
- Chitosan coatinge4
- Outcome
- firmness, titratable acidity, vitamin C contente4
- Direction
- beneficial effectse4
- Setting
- stored at 4°Ce4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The effects of chitosan coatings (1.0% and 2.0% w/v) in controlling the decay of strawberries and raspberries”
e4“Chitosan coating had beneficial effects on firmness, titratable acidity, vitamin C content, and anthocyanin content of strawberries and raspberries stored at 4°C”
Claim · model-written summary
Chitosan coating had beneficial effects on anthocyanin content of berries stored at 4°C.
- Taxon
- strawberries and raspberriese0
- Treatment
- Chitosan coatinge4
- Outcome
- anthocyanin contente4
- Direction
- beneficial effectse4
- Setting
- stored at 4°Ce4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The effects of chitosan coatings (1.0% and 2.0% w/v) in controlling the decay of strawberries and raspberries”
e4“Chitosan coating had beneficial effects on firmness, titratable acidity, vitamin C content, and anthocyanin content of strawberries and raspberries stored at 4°C”
The same questions in other papers
chitosan · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →chitosan · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →chitosan · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
39 papers more in this group
See all 43 papers →chitosan · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →chitosan · disease · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
chitosan · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
chitosan · quality: phytochemicals · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
chitosan · Botrytis cinerea · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →8 of 18 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.