Paper · 2011 · Agronomy Journal

INVESTIGATION OF DOSE AND TIME APPLICATION OF METRIBUZIN ON WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM) CULTIVARS YIELD AND WEEDS CONTROL IN VARAMIN

Mohtasebi Reza; Baghestani Mohammad Ali; Zand Eskandar; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to survey the efficiency of metribuzin herbicide (sencor %75 wp) in weed control and its influence on wheat cultivars, a field study was conducted in Varamin region. Experiment was carried out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 4 replication as factorial arrangement. The experimental factors consist of: wheat cultivar in 3 levels (Shiraz, Pishtaz and M-79-6 line), different amount of metribuzin herbicide in 4 levels (0, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 kg/ha as commercial substance in form of 75 percent wettable powders (wp %75) and time application of herbicide in 2 levels (Pre-emergence and Post-emergence), together with weed infested treatment were compared and evaluated. For results explanation wheat yield (grain & biological), weeds dry matter and their number was measured before and 30 days after herbicide treatment. Results showed that 0.5 Kg/ha dose in pre-emergence time had the most suitable influence on reducing weeds control and least phytotoxicity on wheat cultivars. But due to high phytotoxicity, wheat cultivars and different amount of metribuzin in two time application were not showed any significant difference in wheat yield in weed infested treatments and non treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre emergence metribuzin at 0.5 Kg/ha gave the most suitable weed reduction.

Treatment
0.5 Kg/ha dose in pre-emergence timee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weeds controle0
Direction
reducinge0
Setting
VARAMINt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.5 Kg/ha dose in pre-emergence time had the most suitable influence on reducing weeds control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM) CULTIVARS YIELD AND WEEDS CONTROL IN VARAMIN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment caused the least wheat phytotoxicity.

Treatment
0.5 Kg/ha dose in pre-emergence timee0
Outcome
phytotoxicity on wheat cultivarse0
Direction
leaste0
Setting
VARAMINt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.5 Kg/ha dose in pre-emergence time had the most suitable influence on reducing weeds control and least phytotoxicity on wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM) CULTIVARS YIELD AND WEEDS CONTROL IN VARAMIN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield did not differ significantly among cultivar and metribuzin treatments.

Treatment
different amount of metribuzin in two time applicatione0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
not showed any significant differencee0
Comparator
weed infested treatments and non treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat cultivars and different amount of metribuzin in two time application were not showed any significant difference in wheat yield in weed infested treatments and non treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM) CULTIVARS YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–101 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 20 positive, 32 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.