Paper · 2008 · ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice

Influence of crop establishment techniques and sources of nutrients on productivity, energetics and economics of rice

H. M. Jayadeva; T.K. Prabhakara Shetty

14
claims
31
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influence of crop establishment techniques and sources of nutrients on productivity, energetics and economics of rice was studied in red clay loam soil. The SRI establishment technique recorded significantly higher grain and straw yield (10171 and 11265 kg ha-1 respectively), total energy ouput (290329 MJ ha-1), energy output: input ratio (15.78), gross income (666.58 Rs. ha-1), net income (49256 Rs. ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.84) compared to transplanting and aerobic techniques. Among the sources of nutrients, application of FYM + recommended NPK recorded higher grain and straw yield (8871 and 9938 kg ha-1, respectively), total energy output (254629 MJ ha-1) and gross income (58196 Rs. Ha-1), whereas application of recommended NPK recorded significantly higher energy output: input ratio (15.00). In-situ incorporation of green manure (Sunnhemp) + Recommended NPK recorded higher net income (42636 Rs. Ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.79) as compared to other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI gave significantly higher grain yield of 10171 kg ha-1 than transplanting and aerobic techniques.

Treatment
SRI establishment techniquee0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
10171e0
Comparator
transplanting and aerobic techniquese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SRI establishment technique recorded significantly higher grain and straw yield (10171 and 11265 kg ha-1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to transplanting and aerobic techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI gave significantly higher straw yield of 11265 kg ha-1.

Treatment
SRI establishment techniquee0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
11265 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
transplanting and aerobic techniquese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SRI establishment technique recorded significantly higher grain and straw yield (10171 and 11265 kg ha-1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to transplanting and aerobic techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI had significantly higher total energy output of 290329 MJ ha-1.

Treatment
SRI establishment techniquee0
Outcome
total energy oupute1
Direction
highere0
Value
290329 MJ ha-1e1
Comparator
transplanting and aerobic techniquese2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The SRI establishment technique recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–218 · show in text ↑
e1

“total energy ouput (290329 MJ ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–316 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to transplanting and aerobic techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI had significantly higher energy output to input ratio of 15.78.

Treatment
SRI establishment techniquee0
Outcome
energy output: input ratioe1
Direction
highere0
Value
15.78e1
Comparator
transplanting and aerobic techniquese2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The SRI establishment technique recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–218 · show in text ↑
e1

“energy output: input ratio (15.78)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–352 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to transplanting and aerobic techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI had significantly higher gross income, reported as 666.58 Rs. ha-1.

Treatment
SRI establishment techniquee0
Outcome
gross incomee1
Direction
highere0
Value
666.58 Rs. ha-1e1
Comparator
transplanting and aerobic techniquese2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The SRI establishment technique recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–218 · show in text ↑
e1

“gross income (666.58 Rs. ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–384 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to transplanting and aerobic techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI had significantly higher net income of 49256 Rs. ha-1.

Treatment
SRI establishment techniquee0
Outcome
net incomee1
Direction
highere0
Value
49256 Rs. ha-1e1
Comparator
transplanting and aerobic techniquese2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The SRI establishment technique recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–218 · show in text ↑
e1

“net income (49256 Rs. ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–413 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to transplanting and aerobic techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI had significantly higher benefit to cost ratio of 2.84.

Treatment
SRI establishment techniquee0
Outcome
B:C ratioe1
Direction
highere0
Value
2.84e1
Comparator
transplanting and aerobic techniquese1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The SRI establishment technique recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–218 · show in text ↑
e1

“B:C ratio (2.84) compared to transplanting and aerobic techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus recommended NPK gave higher grain yield of 8871 kg ha-1.

Treatment
application of FYM + recommended NPKe0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
8871e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the sources of nutrients, application of FYM + recommended NPK recorded higher grain and straw yield (8871 and 9938 kg ha-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus recommended NPK gave higher straw yield of 9938 kg ha-1.

Treatment
application of FYM + recommended NPKe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
9938 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the sources of nutrients, application of FYM + recommended NPK recorded higher grain and straw yield (8871 and 9938 kg ha-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus recommended NPK gave higher total energy output of 254629 MJ ha-1.

Treatment
application of FYM + recommended NPKe0
Outcome
total energy outpute1
Direction
highere0
Value
254629 MJ ha-1e1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of FYM + recommended NPK recorded higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–569 · show in text ↑
e1

“total energy output (254629 MJ ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus recommended NPK gave higher gross income of 58196 Rs. Ha-1.

Treatment
application of FYM + recommended NPKe0
Outcome
gross incomee1
Direction
highere0
Value
58196 Rs. Ha-1e1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of FYM + recommended NPK recorded higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–569 · show in text ↑
e1

“gross income (58196 Rs. Ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK gave significantly higher energy output to input ratio of 15.00.

Treatment
application of recommended NPKe0
Outcome
energy output: input ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.00e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of recommended NPK recorded significantly higher energy output: input ratio (15.00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunnhemp green manure plus recommended NPK gave higher net income of 42636 Rs. Ha-1 than other treatments.

Treatment
In-situ incorporation of green manure (Sunnhemp) + Recommended NPKe0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
highere0
Value
42636 Rs. Ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In-situ incorporation of green manure (Sunnhemp) + Recommended NPK recorded higher net income (42636 Rs. Ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.79) as compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunnhemp green manure plus recommended NPK gave higher benefit to cost ratio of 2.79.

Treatment
In-situ incorporation of green manure (Sunnhemp) + Recommended NPKe0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.79e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In-situ incorporation of green manure (Sunnhemp) + Recommended NPK recorded higher net income (42636 Rs. Ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.79) as compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–972 · show in text ↑

Crotalaria juncea · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.