Paper · 2013 · Majallah-i 'ulūm-i dānishgāh-i Tihrān

Quantitative expression analysis of candidate genes for Septoria tritici blotch resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Laleh Karimi Farsad; Mohsen Mardi; Mohammad Ali Ebrahimi

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Septoria tritici blotch (STB), caused by the ascomycete fungus Mycosphaerella graminicola (asexual stage: Septoria tritici), is one of the most important foliar diseases of wheat. In this research, quantitative expression analysis of five candidate genes for the induction of resistance to STB (PR-1, Bsi, Msr, Per, and Ppi) was conducted in the wheat cultivars ‘Seri 82’ (susceptible) and ‘Frontana’ (resistant). The study used a randomized complete block design with three replications and five time-points (0, 3, 6, 12, and 24hours after inoculation). Evaluation of the expression of five candidate genes by real-time PCR showed that expression of Per, pr-1, Bsi, Msr genes was higher than 5, 3, 3 and 2 fold in treatment vs. control samples in ‘Frontana’ at 12 hours after inoculation respectively. The results indicated the effectiveness of these genes in the conferral of resistance to STB in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Per expression in resistant Frontana exceeded fivefold over controls at 12 hours after inoculation.

Material
‘Frontana’e0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Gene
Pere0
Outcome
expression of Pere0
Direction
highere0
Value
5, 3, 3 and 2 folde0
Qualifier
12 hours after inoculatione0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression of Per, pr-1, Bsi, Msr genes was higher than 5, 3, 3 and 2 fold in treatment vs. control samples in ‘Frontana’ at 12 hours after inoculation respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars ‘Seri 82’ (susceptible) and ‘Frontana’ (resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pr-1 expression in Frontana exceeded threefold over controls at 12 hours after inoculation.

Material
‘Frontana’e0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Gene
pr-1e0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
highere0
Value
5, 3, 3 and 2 folde0
Qualifier
12 hours after inoculatione0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression of Per, pr-1, Bsi, Msr genes was higher than 5, 3, 3 and 2 fold in treatment vs. control samples in ‘Frontana’ at 12 hours after inoculation respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars ‘Seri 82’ (susceptible) and ‘Frontana’ (resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bsi expression in Frontana exceeded threefold over controls at 12 hours after inoculation.

Material
‘Frontana’e0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Gene
Bsie0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
highere0
Value
5, 3, 3 and 2 folde0
Qualifier
12 hours after inoculatione0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression of Per, pr-1, Bsi, Msr genes was higher than 5, 3, 3 and 2 fold in treatment vs. control samples in ‘Frontana’ at 12 hours after inoculation respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars ‘Seri 82’ (susceptible) and ‘Frontana’ (resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Msr expression in Frontana exceeded twofold over controls at 12 hours after inoculation.

Material
‘Frontana’e0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Gene
Msre0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
highere0
Value
5, 3, 3 and 2 folde0
Qualifier
12 hours after inoculatione0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression of Per, pr-1, Bsi, Msr genes was higher than 5, 3, 3 and 2 fold in treatment vs. control samples in ‘Frontana’ at 12 hours after inoculation respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars ‘Seri 82’ (susceptible) and ‘Frontana’ (resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–412 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors interpret the candidate genes as effective in conferring STB resistance in wheat.

Gene
PR-1, Bsi, Msr, Per, and Ppie1
Outcome
resistance to STBe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated the effectiveness of these genes in the conferral of resistance to STB in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–904 · show in text ↑
e1

“five candidate genes for the induction of resistance to STB (PR-1, Bsi, Msr, Per, and Ppi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–324 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 38 positive, 9 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.