Intervention effectmodel-written summary

pr-1 expression in Frontana exceeded threefold over controls at 12 hours after inoculation.

A claim from Quantitative expression analysis of candidate genes for Septoria tritici blotch resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pr-1 expression in Frontana exceeded threefold over controls at 12 hours after inoculation.

Material
‘Frontana’e0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Gene
pr-1e0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
highere0
Value
5, 3, 3 and 2 folde0
Qualifier
12 hours after inoculatione0
Comparator
control samplese0

Not reportedCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression of Per, pr-1, Bsi, Msr genes was higher than 5, 3, 3 and 2 fold in treatment vs. control samples in ‘Frontana’ at 12 hours after inoculation respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–801
e1

“wheat cultivars ‘Seri 82’ (susceptible) and ‘Frontana’ (resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–412

Title

Quantitative expression analysis of candidate genes for Septoria tritici blotch resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Laleh Karimi Farsad; Mohsen Mardi; Mohammad Ali Ebrahimi Majallah-i 'ulūm-i dānishgāh-i Tihrān 2013. doi:10.22059/pbs.2013.32095

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-cbc6e4f8eaed6ee3050268daa220b2c4b65cd4b3cf83d74cb61403fdfd0ccb4c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 38 positive, 9 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.