Paper · 2006 · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA)

Physiological enhancements for alleviation of salt stress in wheat

Irfan Afzal; Shahzad Maqsood Ahmed Basra; Amjad Hameed; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
64
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Increased salinity is a severe problem to crop production while pre-sowing seed treatments can effectively induce salt tolerance in plants. The effect of different pre-sowing seed treatments (hydropriming, halopriming (50 mM CaCl2.2H2O), ascorbate priming (50 mg L -1 ) and pre-sowing chilling treatment (-19 o C) on seed germination, vigor, antioxidants and total soluble protein content was investigated in two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars Auqab-2000 (salt tolerant) and MH97 (salt sensitive) under saline (15 dS m -1 ) or non-saline (4 dS m -1 ) conditions. Of all the seed pretreatments, halopriming followed by hydropriming was the most effective in alleviating the adverse effect of salinity by improving germination and seedling growth of both cultivars. In addition, the effect of ascorbate priming was more pronounced in salt tolerant cultivar as revealed from curtailed mean germination time, improved seedling vigor and enhanced ascorbate contents and catalase (CAT) activity. Salinity significantly increased leaf protein content in both cultivars but the magnitude of increase in protein content was higher in Auqab-2000 as compared to that in MH-97. All pre-sowing seed treatments significantly enhanced superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in MH-97 while priming with CaCl2.2H2O and ascorbate were very effective in Auqab2000 during stress conditions. The salt-tolerant cultivar Auqab-2000 had a better protection against reactive oxygen species (ROS) as shown by increased SOD amd CAT activities under salt stress. In conclusion, halopriming and hydropriming successfully improved the seed performance in both cultivars whereas priming with ascorbate was only effective in salt tolerant cultivar under saline conditions. This benefit was attributed to early and synchronized germination, vigorous stand establishment, and decreased oxidative damage due to enhanced antioxidant system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halopriming followed by hydropriming was the most effective pre-sowing treatment for improving germination and seedling growth of both wheat cultivars under salinity.

Treatment
halopriming followed by hydropriminge1
Outcome
germination and seedling growthe1
Direction
improvinge1
Comparator
all the seed pretreatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars Auqab-2000 (salt tolerant) and MH97 (salt sensitive) under saline (15 dS m -1 ) or non-saline (4 dS m -1 ) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–569 · show in text ↑
e1

“Of all the seed pretreatments, halopriming followed by hydropriming was the most effective in alleviating the adverse effect of salinity by improving germination and seedling growth of both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate priming was more pronounced in the salt-tolerant cultivar and curtailed mean germination time.

Material
salt tolerant cultivare2
Treatment
ascorbate priminge2
Outcome
mean germination timee2
Direction
curtailede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars Auqab-2000 (salt tolerant) and MH97 (salt sensitive) under saline (15 dS m -1 ) or non-saline (4 dS m -1 ) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–569 · show in text ↑
e2

“the effect of ascorbate priming was more pronounced in salt tolerant cultivar as revealed from curtailed mean germination time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate priming improved seedling vigor in wheat.

Treatment
ascorbate priminge2
Outcome
seedling vigore3
Direction
improvede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars Auqab-2000 (salt tolerant) and MH97 (salt sensitive) under saline (15 dS m -1 ) or non-saline (4 dS m -1 ) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–569 · show in text ↑
e2

“the effect of ascorbate priming was more pronounced in salt tolerant cultivar as revealed from curtailed mean germination time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–911 · show in text ↑
e3

“improved seedling vigor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate priming enhanced ascorbate contents and catalase (CAT) activity in wheat.

Treatment
ascorbate priminge2
Compound
ascorbatee4
Outcome
catalase (CAT) activitye4
Direction
enhancede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars Auqab-2000 (salt tolerant) and MH97 (salt sensitive) under saline (15 dS m -1 ) or non-saline (4 dS m -1 ) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–569 · show in text ↑
e2

“the effect of ascorbate priming was more pronounced in salt tolerant cultivar as revealed from curtailed mean germination time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–911 · show in text ↑
e4

“enhanced ascorbate contents and catalase (CAT) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly increased leaf protein content in both wheat cultivars.

Organ / stage
leafe5
Treatment
Salinitye5
Outcome
leaf protein contente5
Direction
significantly increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars Auqab-2000 (salt tolerant) and MH97 (salt sensitive) under saline (15 dS m -1 ) or non-saline (4 dS m -1 ) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–569 · show in text ↑
e5

“Salinity significantly increased leaf protein content in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1069 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increase in leaf protein content under salinity was higher in Auqab-2000 than in MH-97.

Material
Auqab-2000e6
Outcome
magnitude of increase in protein contente6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
MH-97e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars Auqab-2000 (salt tolerant) and MH97 (salt sensitive) under saline (15 dS m -1 ) or non-saline (4 dS m -1 ) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–569 · show in text ↑
e6

“the magnitude of increase in protein content was higher in Auqab-2000 as compared to that in MH-97”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All pre-sowing seed treatments significantly enhanced superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in MH-97.

Material
MH-97e7
Treatment
pre-sowing seed treatmentse7
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD) activitye7
Direction
significantly enhancede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars Auqab-2000 (salt tolerant) and MH97 (salt sensitive) under saline (15 dS m -1 ) or non-saline (4 dS m -1 ) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–569 · show in text ↑
e7

“All pre-sowing seed treatments significantly enhanced superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in MH-97 while priming with CaCl2.2H2O and ascorbate were very effective in Auqab2000 during stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming with CaCl2.2H2O and ascorbate was very effective in Auqab-2000 during stress conditions.

Material
Auqab2000e7
Treatment
priming with CaCl2.2H2O and ascorbatee7
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD) activitye7
Direction
very effectivee7
Setting
stress conditionse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars Auqab-2000 (salt tolerant) and MH97 (salt sensitive) under saline (15 dS m -1 ) or non-saline (4 dS m -1 ) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–569 · show in text ↑
e7

“All pre-sowing seed treatments significantly enhanced superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in MH-97 while priming with CaCl2.2H2O and ascorbate were very effective in Auqab2000 during stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1374 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The salt-tolerant cultivar Auqab-2000 had better protection against reactive oxygen species under salt stress, shown by increased SOD and CAT activities.

Material
Auqab-2000e1
Treatment
salt stresse1
Outcome
protection against reactive oxygen species (ROS)e1
Direction
bettere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars Auqab-2000 (salt tolerant) and MH97 (salt sensitive) under saline (15 dS m -1 ) or non-saline (4 dS m -1 ) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–569 · show in text ↑
e1

“The salt-tolerant cultivar Auqab-2000 had a better protection against reactive oxygen species (ROS) as shown by increased SOD amd CAT activities under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halopriming and hydropriming successfully improved seed performance in both wheat cultivars.

Material
both cultivarse1
Treatment
halopriming and hydropriminge1
Outcome
seed performancee1
Direction
successfully improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars Auqab-2000 (salt tolerant) and MH97 (salt sensitive) under saline (15 dS m -1 ) or non-saline (4 dS m -1 ) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–569 · show in text ↑
e1

“halopriming and hydropriming successfully improved the seed performance in both cultivars whereas priming with ascorbate was only effective in salt tolerant cultivar under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate priming was only effective for seed performance in the salt-tolerant cultivar under saline conditions.

Material
salt tolerant cultivare1
Treatment
priming with ascorbatee1
Outcome
seed performancee1
Direction
only effectivee1
Setting
under saline conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars Auqab-2000 (salt tolerant) and MH97 (salt sensitive) under saline (15 dS m -1 ) or non-saline (4 dS m -1 ) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–569 · show in text ↑
e1

“halopriming and hydropriming successfully improved the seed performance in both cultivars whereas priming with ascorbate was only effective in salt tolerant cultivar under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1744 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit of seed priming is attributed to decreased oxidative damage from an enhanced antioxidant system.

Outcome
decreased oxidative damagee2
Qualifier
enhanced antioxidant systeme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars Auqab-2000 (salt tolerant) and MH97 (salt sensitive) under saline (15 dS m -1 ) or non-saline (4 dS m -1 ) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–569 · show in text ↑
e2

“This benefit was attributed to early and synchronized germination, vigorous stand establishment, and decreased oxidative damage due to enhanced antioxidant system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1746–1908 · show in text ↑

ascorbate · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ascorbate · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

293 papers: 259 positive, 34 negative or no effect

258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

289 papers more in this group

See all 293 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.