Paper · 1999 · Plant and Cell Physiology

Wheat Chloroplastic Glutathione Reductase Activity is Regulated by the Combined Effect of pH, NADPH and GSSG

H. R. Lascano; L. D. Gomez; L. M. Casano; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To study the mechanism of regulation of chloroplastic glutathione reductase (GR) under photooxidative conditions, GR activity, and the levels of NADPH, GSH and GSSG were measured in wheat chloroplasts under photooxidative light. GR was extremely labile, and the concentrations of GSH and GSSG progressively diminished in chloroplasts prepared without ascorbate. The NADPH level did not significantly change during photooxidative treatment. The addition of 10 mM ascorbate to the incubation medium prevented the decrease of GSH and GSSG and strongly protected GR activity. However, ascorbate had no effect on NADPH-dependent inhibition of the chloroplastic GR purified from wheat leaves. We studied the effect of NADPH, temperature, pH and GSSG on the purified enzyme. The inhibition by NADPH was greatly dependent on temperature and pH. NADPH inhibited GR by around 93% up to pH 7.5, but within a range of 8.0 to 9.5 the inhibition was only marginal. The pH dependence of the NADPH inhibitory effect could be due, at least in part, to different rates in the generation of NADPH-X, a derivative of NADPH which inactivates several pyridin nucleotide dehydrogenases. Furthermore, the NADPH-dependent inhibition was almost completely prevented by GSSG, but not by GSH.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GR was extremely labile under photooxidative conditions.

Outcome
GR was extremely labilee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GR was extremely labile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–252 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Chloroplastic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GSH and GSSG concentrations progressively diminished in chloroplasts prepared without ascorbate.

Treatment
without ascorbatee0
Outcome
concentrations of GSH and GSSGe0
Direction
progressively diminishede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentrations of GSH and GSSG progressively diminished in chloroplasts prepared without ascorbate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–360 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat chloroplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–200 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NADPH level did not significantly change during photooxidative treatment.

Treatment
photooxidative treatmente0
Outcome
NADPH levele0
Direction
did not significantly changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NADPH level did not significantly change during photooxidative treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–439 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat chloroplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate prevented decreases in GSH and GSSG.

Treatment
10 mM ascorbatee0
Outcome
GSH and GSSGe0
Direction
prevented the decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of 10 mM ascorbate to the incubation medium prevented the decrease of GSH and GSSG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–535 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat chloroplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate strongly protected GR activity.

Treatment
10 mM ascorbatee0
Outcome
GR activitye0
Direction
strongly protectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 mM ascorbate to the incubation medium prevented the decrease of GSH and GSSG and strongly protected GR activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–570 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat chloroplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate had no effect on NADPH-dependent inhibition of purified chloroplastic GR.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
ascorbatee0
Outcome
NADPH-dependent inhibition of the chloroplastic GRe0
Direction
had no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ascorbate had no effect on NADPH-dependent inhibition of the chloroplastic GR purified from wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–685 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NADPH inhibition of GR depended greatly on temperature and pH.

Treatment
temperature and pHe0
Outcome
inhibition by NADPHe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition by NADPH was greatly dependent on temperature and pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat chloroplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NADPH inhibited GR by around 93% up to pH 7.5.

Treatment
NADPHe0
Outcome
GRe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
around 93%e0
Qualifier
up to pH 7.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NADPH inhibited GR by around 93% up to pH 7.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–882 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat chloroplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–200 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NADPH inhibition was only marginal at pH 8.0 to 9.5.

Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
only marginale0
Qualifier
8.0 to 9.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“within a range of 8.0 to 9.5 the inhibition was only marginal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–949 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat chloroplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–200 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest pH-dependent NADPH-X generation may explain pH dependence of NADPH inhibition.

Compound
NADPH-Xe0
Outcome
pH dependence of the NADPH inhibitory effecte0
Qualifier
could be due, at least in parte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pH dependence of the NADPH inhibitory effect could be due, at least in part, to different rates in the generation of NADPH-X, a derivative of NADPH which inactivates several pyridin nucleotide dehydrogenases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1163 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat chloroplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GSSG almost completely prevented NADPH-dependent inhibition.

Treatment
GSSGe0
Outcome
NADPH-dependent inhibitione0
Direction
almost completely preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NADPH-dependent inhibition was almost completely prevented by GSSG, but not by GSH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1263 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat chloroplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GSH did not prevent NADPH-dependent inhibition.

Treatment
GSHe0
Outcome
NADPH-dependent inhibitione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NADPH-dependent inhibition was almost completely prevented by GSSG, but not by GSH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1263 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat chloroplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–200 · show in text ↑

ascorbate · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

glutathione · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ascorbate · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.