Paper · 2004 · Tree Physiology

Effects of regulated deficit irrigation during the pre-harvest period on gas exchange, leaf development and crop yield of mature almond trees

P. Romero; J. M. Navarro; F. Garcia; et al.

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
89
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

We investigated the effects of regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) during the pre-harvest period (kernel-filling stage) on water relations, leaf development and crop yield in mature almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Cartagenera) trees during a 2-year field experiment. Trees were either irrigated at full-crop evapotranspiration (ETc=100%) (well-irrigated control treatment) or subjected to an RDI treatment that consisted of full irrigation for the full season, except from early June to early August (kernel-filling stage), when 20% ETc was applied. The severity of water stress was characterized by measurements of soil water content, predawn leaf water potential (Psipd) and relative water content (RWC). Stomatal conductance (gs), net CO2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration rate (E), leaf abscission, leaf expansion rate and crop yield were also measured. In both years, Psipd and RWC of well-irrigated trees were maintained above -1.0 MPa and 92%, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for trees in the RDI treatment were -2.37 MPa and 82%. Long-term water stress led to a progressive decline in gs, A and E, with significant reductions after 21 days in the RDI treatment. At the time of maximum stress (48 days after commencement of RDI), A, gs and E were 64, 67 and 56% lower than control values, respectively. High correlations between A, E and gs were observed. Plant water status recovered within 15 days after the resumption of irrigation and was associated with recovery of soil water content. A relatively rapid and complete recovery of A and gs was also observed, although the recovery was slower than for Psipd and RWC. Severe water stress during the kernel-filling stage resulted in premature defoliation (caused by increased leaf abscission) and a reduction in leaf growth rate, which decreased tree leaf area. Although kernel yield was correlated with leaf water potential, RDI caused a nonsignificant 7% reduction in kernel yield and had no effect on kernel size. The RDI treatment also improved water-use efficiency because about 30% less irrigation water was applied in the RDI treatment than in the control treatment. We conclude that high-cropping almonds can be successfully grown in semiarid regions in an RDI regime provided that Psipd is maintained above a threshold value of -2 MPa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under RDI, predawn leaf water potential was -2.37 MPa versus above -1.0 MPa in controls.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Material
cv. Cartagenerae0
Treatment
RDI treatmente1
Outcome
Psipde1
Value
-2.37 MPae1
Qualifier
above -1.0 MPae1
Comparator
well-irrigated treese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Cartagenera) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“Psipd and RWC of well-irrigated trees were maintained above -1.0 MPa and 92%, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for trees in the RDI treatment were -2.37 MPa and 82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under RDI, relative water content was 82% versus above 92% in controls.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
RDI treatmente1
Outcome
RWCe1
Value
82%e1
Qualifier
92%e1
Comparator
well-irrigated treese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Cartagenera) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“Psipd and RWC of well-irrigated trees were maintained above -1.0 MPa and 92%, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for trees in the RDI treatment were -2.37 MPa and 82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term RDI stress progressively reduced stomatal conductance, CO2 assimilation and transpiration, significantly after 21 days.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
RDI treatmente1
Outcome
gs, A and Ee1
Direction
declinee1
Qualifier
after 21 dayse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Long-term water stress led to a progressive decline in gs, A and E, with significant reductions after 21 days in the RDI treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At maximum stress, CO2 assimilation was 64% lower than controls.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
RDIe1
Outcome
Ae1
Direction
lowere1
Value
64e1
Comparator
control valuese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the time of maximum stress (48 days after commencement of RDI), A, gs and E were 64, 67 and 56% lower than control values, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At maximum stress, stomatal conductance was 67% lower than controls.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
RDIe1
Outcome
gse1
Direction
lowere1
Value
67e1
Comparator
control valuese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the time of maximum stress (48 days after commencement of RDI), A, gs and E were 64, 67 and 56% lower than control values, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At maximum stress, transpiration was 56% lower than controls.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
RDIe1
Outcome
Ee1
Direction
lowere1
Value
56%e1
Comparator
control valuese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the time of maximum stress (48 days after commencement of RDI), A, gs and E were 64, 67 and 56% lower than control values, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1337 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 assimilation, transpiration and stomatal conductance were highly correlated.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Organ / stage
almonde0
Outcome
A, E and gse1
Qualifier
High correlationse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“High correlations between A, E and gs were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1390 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant water status recovered within 15 days after irrigation resumed.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Outcome
Plant water statuse1
Direction
recoverede1
Value
15 dayse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant water status recovered within 15 days after the resumption of irrigation and was associated with recovery of soil water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1525 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 assimilation and stomatal conductance recovered rapidly and completely, more slowly than water status.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Outcome
A and gse1
Direction
recoverye1
Qualifier
slowere1
Comparator
Psipd and RWCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“A relatively rapid and complete recovery of A and gs was also observed, although the recovery was slower than for Psipd and RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe kernel-filling water stress caused premature defoliation.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Organ / stage
kernel-filling stagee1
Treatment
Severe water stresse1
Outcome
premature defoliatione1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Severe water stress during the kernel-filling stage resulted in premature defoliation (caused by increased leaf abscission) and a reduction in leaf growth rate, which decreased tree leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe kernel-filling water stress reduced leaf growth rate and leaf area.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Organ / stage
kernel-filling stagee1
Treatment
Severe water stresse1
Outcome
leaf growth ratee1
Direction
reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Severe water stress during the kernel-filling stage resulted in premature defoliation (caused by increased leaf abscission) and a reduction in leaf growth rate, which decreased tree leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1847 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel yield correlated with leaf water potential.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Organ / stage
leafe1
Outcome
kernel yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“kernel yield was correlated with leaf water potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI reduced kernel yield by a nonsignificant 7%.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
RDIe1
Outcome
kernel yielde1
Direction
reductione1
Value
7%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“RDI caused a nonsignificant 7% reduction in kernel yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1913–1969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI had no effect on kernel size.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
RDIe1
Outcome
kernel sizee1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“RDI caused a nonsignificant 7% reduction in kernel yield and had no effect on kernel size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1913–2002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI improved water-use efficiency with about 30% less irrigation water.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
RDI treatmente1
Outcome
water-use efficiencye1
Direction
improvede1
Value
30%e1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“The RDI treatment also improved water-use efficiency because about 30% less irrigation water was applied in the RDI treatment than in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2159 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend RDI for high-cropping almonds in semiarid regions if predawn water potential stays above -2 MPa.

Taxon
almondsPrunus dulcise1
Outcome
grown in semiarid regions in an RDI regimee1
Value
-2 MPae1
Qualifier
provided that Psipd is maintained above a threshold value of -2 MPae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“high-cropping almonds can be successfully grown in semiarid regions in an RDI regime provided that Psipd is maintained above a threshold value of -2 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2178–2330 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Prunus dulcis (almond)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

irrigation · yield · Prunus dulcis (almond)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 10 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

irrigation · physiology: gas exchange · Prunus dulcis (almond)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · pest · Prunus dulcis (almond)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

drought · growth · Prunus dulcis (almond)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.