Paper · 1996 · Tree Physiology

Isoprene emission, photosynthesis, and growth in sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) seedlings exposed to short- and long-term drying cycles

C. Fang; R. K. Monson; E. B. Cowling

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
93
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Isoprene emissions were studied in one-year old sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) seedlings during nine drying-rewatering cycles extending over five months. Each drying cycle lasted to the point of leaf wilting. Growth was essentially stopped in response to the first drying cycle, though seedling survival and capacity to recover turgor on rewatering remained high throughout the entire nine cycles. Photosynthetic rates of leaves were inhibited by the drying treatments. Under severe drought, isoprene emission rates of leaves were also inhibited, though isoprene emission was generally less sensitive to drought than photosynthesis. The lower drought sensitivity of isoprene emission compared with photosynthesis resulted in a higher percentage of fixed carbon lost as isoprene as seedlings became more stressed. During the recovery phase of the drying-rewatering cycles, isoprene emission rates in several seedlings were higher than in well-watered control seedlings. Following the ninth drying-rewatering cycle, sustained daily watering resulted in recovery of isoprene emission rates to control values within four days. Photosynthetic rates only recovered to 50% of control values after seven days. We conclude that the mechanisms regulating photosynthetic rate and isoprene emission rate are differentially influenced by limited water supplies. The results are consistent with past studies that predict a protective role for isoprene emission during stress, particularly protection from excessive leaf temperatures during drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of sweetgum seedlings essentially stopped in response to the first drying cycle.

Treatment
first drying cyclee0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
stoppede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liquidambar styraciflua
Liquidambar styraciflua · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Growth was essentially stopped in response to the first drying cycle, though seedling survival and capacity to recover turgor on rewatering remained high throughout the entire nine cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–403 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling survival and capacity to recover turgor on rewatering remained high through all nine drying cycles.

Outcome
seedling survival and capacity to recover turgor on rewateringe0
Qualifier
throughout the entire nine cyclese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liquidambar styraciflua
Liquidambar styraciflua · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Growth was essentially stopped in response to the first drying cycle, though seedling survival and capacity to recover turgor on rewatering remained high throughout the entire nine cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rates of leaves were inhibited by the drying treatments.

Treatment
drying treatmentse1
Outcome
Photosynthetic rates of leavese1
Direction
inhibitede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liquidambar styraciflua
Liquidambar styraciflua · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Photosynthetic rates of leaves were inhibited by the drying treatments. Under severe drought, isoprene emission rates of leaves were also inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought, isoprene emission rates of leaves were inhibited.

Treatment
severe droughte1
Outcome
isoprene emission rates of leavese1
Direction
inhibitede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liquidambar styraciflua
Liquidambar styraciflua · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Photosynthetic rates of leaves were inhibited by the drying treatments. Under severe drought, isoprene emission rates of leaves were also inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–552 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoprene emission was generally less sensitive to drought than photosynthesis.

Treatment
droughte2
Outcome
isoprene emissione2
Direction
less sensitivee2
Comparator
photosynthesise2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liquidambar styraciflua
Liquidambar styraciflua · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–93 · show in text ↑
e2

“isoprene emission was generally less sensitive to drought than photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–638 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lower drought sensitivity of isoprene emission left a higher percentage of fixed carbon lost as isoprene as seedlings became more stressed.

Treatment
seedlings became more stressede3
Outcome
percentage of fixed carbon lost as isoprenee3
Direction
highere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liquidambar styraciflua
Liquidambar styraciflua · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–93 · show in text ↑
e3

“The lower drought sensitivity of isoprene emission compared with photosynthesis resulted in a higher percentage of fixed carbon lost as isoprene as seedlings became more stressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During recovery from drying-rewatering cycles, isoprene emission rates in several seedlings were higher than in well-watered controls.

Treatment
drying-rewatering cyclese4
Outcome
isoprene emission ratese4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
in several seedlingse4
Comparator
well-watered control seedlingse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liquidambar styraciflua
Liquidambar styraciflua · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–93 · show in text ↑
e4

“During the recovery phase of the drying-rewatering cycles, isoprene emission rates in several seedlings were higher than in well-watered control seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the ninth drying-rewatering cycle, sustained daily watering recovered isoprene emission rates to control values within four days.

Treatment
sustained daily wateringe5
Outcome
recovery of isoprene emission ratese5
Value
within four dayse5
Comparator
control valuese5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liquidambar styraciflua
Liquidambar styraciflua · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“Following the ninth drying-rewatering cycle, sustained daily watering resulted in recovery of isoprene emission rates to control values within four days. Photosynthetic rates only recovered to 50% of control values after seven days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rates recovered only to 50% of control values after seven days of sustained daily watering.

Treatment
sustained daily wateringe5
Outcome
Photosynthetic ratese5
Value
50%e5
Qualifier
after seven dayse5
Comparator
control valuese5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liquidambar styraciflua
Liquidambar styraciflua · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“Following the ninth drying-rewatering cycle, sustained daily watering resulted in recovery of isoprene emission rates to control values within four days. Photosynthetic rates only recovered to 50% of control values after seven days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1207 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate and isoprene emission rate are differentially influenced by limited water supplies.

Treatment
limited water suppliese6
Outcome
photosynthetic rate and isoprene emission ratee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liquidambar styraciflua
Liquidambar styraciflua · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–93 · show in text ↑
e6

“We conclude that the mechanisms regulating photosynthetic rate and isoprene emission rate are differentially influenced by limited water supplies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1354 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Isoprene emission may have a protective role against excessive leaf temperatures during drought.

Outcome
protective role for isoprene emissione7
Qualifier
protection from excessive leaf temperatures during droughte7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liquidambar styraciflua
Liquidambar styraciflua · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–93 · show in text ↑
e7

“The results are consistent with past studies that predict a protective role for isoprene emission during stress, particularly protection from excessive leaf temperatures during drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1540 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Liquidambar styraciflua (sweet gum)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

processing · physiology: photosynthesis · Liquidambar styraciflua (sweet gum)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

drought · environment: emissions · Liquidambar styraciflua (sweet gum)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.