Paper · 2004

WATER USE OF PROCESSING TOMATO IN THE CAPITANATA REGION (SOUTHERN ITALY)

Michele Rinaldi; Gianfranco Rana

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) is an important irrigated crop in Southern Italy and, mainly, in the Capitanata plain. High values of seasonal irrigation water force the farmer to a more rational water management, that can be obtained by means of a more precise estimation and evaluation of crop coefficients (Kc = ETm/ETo). In this research Kc estimation was carried out by measuring maximum evapotranspiration (ETm) with ”Eddy covariance” method using, among the others, a sonic anemometer to measure sensible heat flux. The field experiments were carried out with “square shape” tomato (for peeled) in 2000 and “deep globe shape” tomato (for paste) in 2001, placing the instruments in the center of large homogenous fields (> 10 ha) in the Foggia plain (Capitanata). Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) was estimated by means of the Penman-Monteith formula and, in addition, with Hargreaves equation requiring maximum and minimum daily temperatures only and a local calibration. Experimentally measured and FAO suggested crop coefficients were compared: peeled tomato, in the intermediate phase, showed Kc greater of 0.13 than that reported by FAO. Local calibration of Hargreaves equation allowed a significant improvement of ETo estimation. Seasonal water use was estimated (500 and 550 mm, in 2000 and in 2001, respectively) and resulted in accordance to the actual farmer irrigation supply, taking into account an irrigation efficiency of drip irrigation of about 83-85%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peeled tomato in the intermediate phase had a Kc 0.13 greater than the FAO-reported value.

Taxon
peeled tomatoe1
Organ / stage
intermediate phasee1
Outcome
Kce1
Direction
greatere1
Value
0.13e1
Comparator
FAOe1

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“peeled tomato, in the intermediate phase, showed Kc greater of 0.13 than that reported by FAO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Local calibration of the Hargreaves equation significantly improved the estimation of ETo.

Taxon
PROCESSING TOMATOt0
Treatment
Local calibration of Hargreaves equatione2
Outcome
ETo estimatione2
Direction
improvemente2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–30 · show in text ↑
e2

“Local calibration of Hargreaves equation allowed a significant improvement of ETo estimation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1261 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal water use of processing tomato was 500 and 550 mm in 2000 and 2001, respectively.

Taxon
PROCESSING TOMATOt0
Outcome
Seasonal water usee3
Value
500 and 550 mme3
Qualifier
in 2000 and in 2001, respectivelye3

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–30 · show in text ↑
e3

“Seasonal water use was estimated (500 and 550 mm, in 2000 and in 2001, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1347 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal water use of processing tomato was in accordance with the actual farmer irrigation supply.

Taxon
PROCESSING TOMATOt0
Outcome
Seasonal water usee4
Qualifier
taking into account an irrigation efficiency of drip irrigation of about 83-85%e4
Comparator
actual farmer irrigation supplye4

Verbatim

t0

“PROCESSING TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–30 · show in text ↑
e4

“Seasonal water use was estimated (500 and 550 mm, in 2000 and in 2001, respectively) and resulted in accordance to the actual farmer irrigation supply, taking into account an irrigation efficiency of drip irrigation of about 83-85%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1494 · show in text ↑