Paper · 2006 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Synthetic cytokinins extend the phase of division of parenchyma cells in developing pear (Pyrus communisL.) fruits

A. Shargal; S. Golobovich; Z. Yablovich; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryFinal fruit size in pear depends on the combined contributions of the number of cells present at fruit-set, the number of subsequent cell divisions, and on cell expansion. To date, in spite of the commercial application of cytokinins to induce larger fruits, no detailed studies have addressed the question of how cytokinin signalling and cell division regulate fruit growth under field conditions. As previously reported, ‘Spadona’ pear fruits treated once with N(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)-N’-phenylurea (CPPU) or N-phenyl-N’-1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-ylurea (TDZ) showed a significant increase in size compared to untreated fruit. Here we monitored the effect of CPPU and TDZ treatments on the number and size of parenchyma cells and stone cells in fruit pulp. Application of both synthetic cytokinins on 10 mmsized fruitlets had no effect on the size or number of stone cells during fruit development. However, the parenchyma that forms the fruit flesh, between the epidermis and the seed layers, had significantly smaller cells and produced higher numbers of cells compared to untreated fruit. The increase in parenchyma cell numbers correlated with a prolonged phase of cell division, as demonstrated by the detection of G2 nuclei using fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. Hence a single spray with CPPU or TDZ can induce an increase in the diameter of pear fruit by extending the phase of cell division in parenchymal cells in the pulp.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Previously reported CPPU treatment significantly increased Spadona pear fruit size over untreated fruit.

Material
‘Spadona’e0
Treatment
N(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)-N’-phenylurea (CPPU)e0
Outcome
sizee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrus communisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘Spadona’ pear fruits treated once with N(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)-N’-phenylurea (CPPU) or N-phenyl-N’-1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-ylurea (TDZ) showed a significant increase in size compared to untreated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Previously reported TDZ treatment significantly increased Spadona pear fruit size over untreated fruit.

Material
‘Spadona’e0
Treatment
N-phenyl-N’-1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-ylurea (TDZ)e0
Outcome
sizee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrus communisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘Spadona’ pear fruits treated once with N(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)-N’-phenylurea (CPPU) or N-phenyl-N’-1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-ylurea (TDZ) showed a significant increase in size compared to untreated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both synthetic cytokinin treatments left stone cell size and number unchanged during pear fruit development.

Organ / stage
fruitletse0
Treatment
both synthetic cytokininse0
Outcome
size or number of stone cellse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrus communisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of both synthetic cytokinins on 10 mmsized fruitlets had no effect on the size or number of stone cells during fruit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic cytokinin treatment produced significantly smaller pear fruit parenchyma cells than untreated fruit.

Organ / stage
fruit fleshe0
Treatment
both synthetic cytokininse1
Outcome
parenchymae0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrus communisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“However, the parenchyma that forms the fruit flesh, between the epidermis and the seed layers, had significantly smaller cells and produced higher numbers of cells compared to untreated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1090 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of both synthetic cytokinins on 10 mmsized fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic cytokinin treatment produced more pear fruit parenchyma cells than untreated fruit.

Organ / stage
fruit fleshe0
Treatment
both synthetic cytokininse1
Outcome
numbers of cellse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrus communisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“the parenchyma that forms the fruit flesh, between the epidermis and the seed layers, had significantly smaller cells and produced higher numbers of cells compared to untreated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1090 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of both synthetic cytokinins on 10 mmsized fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–821 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher pear parenchyma cell numbers correlated with a prolonged division phase, supported by G2 nuclei detection.

Organ / stage
parenchymae0
Outcome
parenchyma cell numberse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
prolonged phase of cell divisione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrus communisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase in parenchyma cell numbers correlated with a prolonged phase of cell division, as demonstrated by the detection of G2 nuclei using fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1286 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that a single CPPU spray enlarges pear fruit diameter by extending pulp parenchyma division.

Treatment
a single spray with CPPUe0
Outcome
diameter of pear fruite0
Qualifier
extending the phase of cell division in parenchymal cells in the pulpe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrus communisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“a single spray with CPPU or TDZ can induce an increase in the diameter of pear fruit by extending the phase of cell division in parenchymal cells in the pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1451 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that a single TDZ spray enlarges pear fruit diameter by extending pulp parenchyma division.

Treatment
TDZe0
Outcome
diameter of pear fruite0
Qualifier
extending the phase of cell division in parenchymal cells in the pulpe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrus communisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“a single spray with CPPU or TDZ can induce an increase in the diameter of pear fruit by extending the phase of cell division in parenchymal cells in the pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1451 · show in text ↑

Thidiazuron · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

forchlorfenuron · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

class · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.