Paper · 2014 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Effects of Nitrogen on the Distribution and Chemical Speciation of Iron and Zinc in Pearling Fractions of Wheat Grain

Yan-Fang Xue; Tristan Eagling; Jibin He; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
54
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Increasing nitrogen supply can increase Fe and Zn concentrations in wheat grain, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Size-exclusion chromatography coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was used to determine Fe and Zn speciation in the soluble extracts of grain pearling fractions of two wheat cultivars grown at two N rates (100 and 350 kg of N ha(-1)). Increasing N supply increased the concentrations of total Fe and Zn and the portions of Fe and Zn unextractable with a Tris-HCl buffer and decreased the concentrations of Tris-HCl-extractable (soluble) Fe and Zn. Within the soluble fraction, Fe and Zn bound to low molecular weight compounds, likely to be Fe-nicotianamine and Fe-deoxymugineic acid or Zn-nicotianamine, were decreased by 5-12% and 4-37%, respectively, by the high N treatment, whereas Fe and Zn bound to soluble high molecular weight or soluble phytate fractions were less affected. The positive effect of N on grain Fe and Zn concentrations was attributed to an increased sink in the grain, probably in the form of water-insoluble proteins.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N supply increased the concentrations of total Fe and Zn in wheat grain.

Treatment
Increasing N supplye1
Outcome
concentrations of total Fe and Zne2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased the concentrations of total Fe and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N supply increased the portions of Fe and Zn unextractable with a Tris-HCl buffer.

Treatment
Increasing N supplye1
Outcome
portions of Fe and Zn unextractable with a Tris-HCl buffere2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased the concentrations of total Fe and Zn and the portions of Fe and Zn unextractable with a Tris-HCl buffer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N supply decreased the concentrations of Tris-HCl-extractable (soluble) Fe and Zn.

Treatment
Increasing N supplye1
Outcome
concentrations of Tris-HCl-extractable (soluble) Fe and Zne2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“decreased the concentrations of Tris-HCl-extractable (soluble) Fe and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble Fe bound to low molecular weight compounds was decreased by 5-12% by the high N treatment.

Treatment
the high N treatmente1
Compound
Fee1
Outcome
Fe and Zn bound to low molecular weight compoundse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
5-12%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fe and Zn bound to low molecular weight compounds, likely to be Fe-nicotianamine and Fe-deoxymugineic acid or Zn-nicotianamine, were decreased by 5-12% and 4-37%, respectively, by the high N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble Zn bound to low molecular weight compounds was decreased by 4-37% by the high N treatment.

Treatment
the high N treatmente1
Compound
Zne1
Outcome
Fe and Zn bound to low molecular weight compoundse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
4-37%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fe and Zn bound to low molecular weight compounds, likely to be Fe-nicotianamine and Fe-deoxymugineic acid or Zn-nicotianamine, were decreased by 5-12% and 4-37%, respectively, by the high N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe and Zn bound to soluble high molecular weight or soluble phytate fractions were less affected by the high N treatment.

Treatment
the high N treatmente2
Outcome
Fe and Zn bound to soluble high molecular weight or soluble phytate fractionse1
Direction
less affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fe and Zn bound to soluble high molecular weight or soluble phytate fractions were less affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–932 · show in text ↑
e2

“the high N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–826 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute the positive effect of N on grain Fe and Zn concentrations to an increased sink in the grain, probably water-insoluble proteins.

Treatment
Ne1
Outcome
grain Fe and Zn concentrationse1
Qualifier
increased sink in the grain, probably in the form of water-insoluble proteinse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The positive effect of N on grain Fe and Zn concentrations was attributed to an increased sink in the grain, probably in the form of water-insoluble proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1091 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 114 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 114 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.