Paper · 1995 · Tree Physiology

Effects of irrigation, spacing and fertilization on flowering and growth in young Alnus rubra

C. A. Harrington; D. S. Debell

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
9
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Flowering and vegetative growth were assessed in 19 half-sib families of Alnus rubra Bong. planted in a replicated field trial near Olympia, Washington, USA. The trial consisted of three square spacings (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 m), two irrigation regimes (low and high), and two fertilization treatments (0 and 300 kg P ha(-1)). Male and female flowers were surveyed in all plots for all families at plantation ages 4 and 5 years. Female strobili were surveyed for seven families in the 2-m spaced plots at plantation age 6 years. The percentage of trees flowering and the number of flowers per tree were always greatest, and height and diameter growth were always least, in the low-irrigation regime. Phosphorus fertilization had no effect on the percentage of trees flowering or on 5-year height or diameter growth; it had a positive but small effect on the number of female flowers per tree at age 5 years. Wider spacing resulted in larger trees, higher rates of flowering, and higher tree survival. Within each irrigation regime, the percentage of trees flowering increased as tree size increased. There was substantial variation in flowering among families, with positive but low correlations between tree size and flowering attributes. At ages 4 and 5 years, the ratio of number of trees flowering in the low-irrigation regime to number of trees flowering in the high-irrigation regime differed among families. By age 6 years, many more trees flowered than in previous years, and differences between irrigation regimes were reduced. Early growth rates were rapid and resulted in substantial crown recession and mortality in the closer spacings by age 5 years. We conclude that spacings less than 2 m should only be used in seed production areas if roguing can be done by age 2 to 3 years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low irrigation gave the greatest fraction of flowering trees and flowers per tree.

Taxon
Alnus rubraAlnus rubrat0
Treatment
low-irrigation regimee0
Outcome
percentage of trees flowering and the number of flowers per treee0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus rubra
Alnus rubra · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of trees flowering and the number of flowers per tree were always greatest, and height and diameter growth were always least, in the low-irrigation regime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alnus rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low irrigation gave the least height and diameter growth.

Taxon
Alnus rubraAlnus rubrat0
Treatment
low-irrigation regimee0
Outcome
height and diameter growthe0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus rubra
Alnus rubra · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“height and diameter growth were always least, in the low-irrigation regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alnus rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization did not affect flowering percentage or five year growth.

Taxon
Alnus rubraAlnus rubrat0
Treatment
Phosphorus fertilizatione0
Outcome
percentage of trees flowering or on 5-year height or diameter growthe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus rubra
Alnus rubra · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus fertilization had no effect on the percentage of trees flowering or on 5-year height or diameter growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alnus rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization slightly increased female flower number at age five.

Taxon
Alnus rubraAlnus rubrat0
Treatment
Phosphorus fertilizatione2
Outcome
number of female flowers per treee0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus rubra
Alnus rubra · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it had a positive but small effect on the number of female flowers per tree at age 5 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alnus rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phosphorus fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing produced larger trees and higher flowering and survival.

Taxon
Alnus rubraAlnus rubrat0
Treatment
Wider spacinge0
Outcome
larger trees, higher rates of flowering, and higher tree survivale0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus rubra
Alnus rubra · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing resulted in larger trees, higher rates of flowering, and higher tree survival.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alnus rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering percentage increased with tree size within irrigation regimes.

Taxon
Alnus rubraAlnus rubrat0
Outcome
percentage of trees floweringe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Within each irrigation regimee0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus rubra
Alnus rubra · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within each irrigation regime, the percentage of trees flowering increased as tree size increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alnus rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering varied substantially among families.

Taxon
Alnus rubraAlnus rubrat0
Outcome
variation in floweringe0
Direction
substantiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus rubra
Alnus rubra · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was substantial variation in flowering among families”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alnus rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree size and flowering traits had positive but low correlations.

Taxon
Alnus rubraAlnus rubrat0
Outcome
flowering attributese0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
tree sizee0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus rubra
Alnus rubra · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive but low correlations between tree size and flowering attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alnus rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The irrigation effect on flowering differed among families at ages four and five.

Taxon
Alnus rubraAlnus rubrat0
Material
familiese0
Outcome
ratio of number of trees floweringe0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus rubra
Alnus rubra · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At ages 4 and 5 years, the ratio of number of trees flowering in the low-irrigation regime to number of trees flowering in the high-irrigation regime differed among families.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alnus rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By age six, more trees flowered and irrigation differences were reduced.

Taxon
Alnus rubraAlnus rubrat0
Outcome
trees flowerede0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus rubra
Alnus rubra · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By age 6 years, many more trees flowered than in previous years, and differences between irrigation regimes were reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1531 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alnus rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Close spacing caused crown recession and mortality by age five.

Taxon
Alnus rubraAlnus rubrat0
Treatment
closer spacingse0
Outcome
crown recession and mortalitye0
Direction
substantiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus rubra
Alnus rubra · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early growth rates were rapid and resulted in substantial crown recession and mortality in the closer spacings by age 5 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alnus rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Seed production spacing below 2 m was recommended only with roguing by age two to three.

Taxon
Alnus rubraAlnus rubrat0
Outcome
spacings less than 2 m should only be used in seed production areas if roguing can be done by age 2 to 3 yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus rubra
Alnus rubra · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spacings less than 2 m should only be used in seed production areas if roguing can be done by age 2 to 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alnus rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑