Abstract
A pot experiment indicated that in a soil with a replant problem some raspberry cultivars (e.g. Glen Moy and Glen Clova) grew better and showed smaller growth responses to a fungicide (benomyl) and a nematicide (aldicarb) treatment than others (e.g. ‘Mailing Promise’ and ‘Mailing Jewel’). However, although untreated ‘Glen Moy’ grew slightly larger in a field trial than untreated ‘Glen Clova’ and ‘Mailing Jewel’, all three cultivars showed similar large increases in cane growth in plots treated with dazomet. A crop rotation in which raspberry followed a three-year break of cereals, strawberry or fallow did not improve the growth of the replanted raspberry compared with raspberry following raspberry. Nor was the increased growth response to replanting treatments with either full or half rates of dazomet influenced by crop history. Populations of Pratylenchus penetrans were low after planting treatments (< ten 200“1 soil), and, from the lack of a growth response to aldicarb treatments, they appeared to be causing little or no damage in either field trial. Also, there was little growth response to an additional nitrogen treatment. Hence, the main part of the dazomet effect is attributed to control of unknown soil- borne fungi. Pot tests indicated that the beneficial effects of dazomet treatment persisted only for one or two years.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Glen Moy and Glen Clova grew better than Mailing Promise and Mailing Jewel in the replant soil pot experiment.
Verbatim
e0“some raspberry cultivars (e.g. Glen Moy and Glen Clova) grew better and showed smaller growth responses to a fungicide (benomyl) and a nematicide (aldicarb) treatment than others (e.g. ‘Mailing Promise’ and ‘Mailing Jewel’).”
Claim · model-written summary
Glen Moy and Glen Clova had smaller growth responses to benomyl than the other cultivars.
Verbatim
e0“some raspberry cultivars (e.g. Glen Moy and Glen Clova) grew better and showed smaller growth responses to a fungicide (benomyl) and a nematicide (aldicarb) treatment than others (e.g. ‘Mailing Promise’ and ‘Mailing Jewel’).”
Claim · model-written summary
Glen Moy and Glen Clova had smaller growth responses to aldicarb than the other cultivars.
Verbatim
e0“some raspberry cultivars (e.g. Glen Moy and Glen Clova) grew better and showed smaller growth responses to a fungicide (benomyl) and a nematicide (aldicarb) treatment than others (e.g. ‘Mailing Promise’ and ‘Mailing Jewel’).”
Claim · model-written summary
Untreated Glen Moy grew slightly larger than untreated Glen Clova and Mailing Jewel in the field.
Verbatim
e0“untreated ‘Glen Moy’ grew slightly larger in a field trial than untreated ‘Glen Clova’ and ‘Mailing Jewel’”
Claim · model-written summary
All three field cultivars had similarly large cane growth increases with dazomet.
- Taxon
- raspberryt0
- Treatment
- dazomete0
- Outcome
- cane growthe0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Qualifier
- all three cultivarse0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“all three cultivars showed similar large increases in cane growth in plots treated with dazomet.”
t0“raspberry(Rubus idaeus)”
Claim · model-written summary
A three-year break with cereals before raspberry did not improve replanted raspberry growth versus raspberry after raspberry.
Verbatim
e0“A crop rotation in which raspberry followed a three-year break of cereals, strawberry or fallow did not improve the growth of the replanted raspberry compared with raspberry following raspberry.”
Claim · model-written summary
A three-year break with strawberry before raspberry did not improve replanted raspberry growth.
Verbatim
e0“A crop rotation in which raspberry followed a three-year break of cereals, strawberry or fallow did not improve the growth of the replanted raspberry compared with raspberry following raspberry.”
Claim · model-written summary
A three-year fallow break before raspberry did not improve replanted raspberry growth.
Verbatim
e0“A crop rotation in which raspberry followed a three-year break of cereals, strawberry or fallow did not improve the growth of the replanted raspberry compared with raspberry following raspberry.”
Claim · model-written summary
Crop history did not influence the growth response to full-rate dazomet.
Verbatim
e0“Nor was the increased growth response to replanting treatments with either full or half rates of dazomet influenced by crop history.”
t0“raspberry(Rubus idaeus)”
Claim · model-written summary
Crop history did not influence the growth response to half-rate dazomet.
Verbatim
e0“Nor was the increased growth response to replanting treatments with either full or half rates of dazomet influenced by crop history.”
t0“raspberry(Rubus idaeus)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pratylenchus penetrans populations were low after planting treatments.
- Taxon
- raspberryt0
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus penetrans
Pratylenchus penetranse0pest - Outcome
- Populations of Pratylenchus penetranse0
- Direction
- lowe0
- Value
- < ten 200“1 soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Populations of Pratylenchus penetrans were low after planting treatments (< ten 200“1 soil)”
t0“raspberry(Rubus idaeus)”
Claim · model-written summary
Raspberry had little growth response to aldicarb, suggesting little nematode damage.
- Taxon
- raspberryt0
- Treatment
- aldicarb treatmentse0
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus penetransPratylenchus penetranse1pest
- Outcome
- growth responsee0
- Direction
- lack ofe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“from the lack of a growth response to aldicarb treatments, they appeared to be causing little or no damage in either field trial.”
e1“Populations of Pratylenchus penetrans were low after planting treatments”
t0“raspberry(Rubus idaeus)”
Claim · model-written summary
Additional nitrogen treatment produced little growth response.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“there was little growth response to an additional nitrogen treatment.”
t0“raspberry(Rubus idaeus)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors attribute most of the dazomet effect to control of unknown soil-borne fungi.
Verbatim
e0“the main part of the dazomet effect is attributed to control of unknown soil- borne fungi.”
t0“raspberry(Rubus idaeus)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pot tests found that dazomet benefits persisted only one or two years.
Verbatim
e0“Pot tests indicated that the beneficial effects of dazomet treatment persisted only for one or two years.”
t0“raspberry(Rubus idaeus)”
The same questions in other papers
aldicarb · Pratylenchus penetrans · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
nitrogen · growth · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.