Paper · 1988 · Ikushugaku zasshi

Photosynthetic characteristics of the reciprocal interspecific hybrids and their progenies between Atriplex triangularis (C3) and A. rosea (C4).

Hitoshi OGURO; Kokichi HINATA; Muneaki SAMEJIMA; et al.

13
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The plants obtained by crosses between C3 and C4 species in Atriplex were determined to be hybrids in views of morphology and δl3C values. One F1 plant of A, triangularis (C3, n=9) x A, rosea (C4, n=9) and one of the reciprocal cross had good pollen and seed fertilities. No prominent differences were observed between these reciprocal Fis in morphological characters. Most of the F2 plants showed a high pollen fertility (more than 70%), and 19 out of the 20 plants so far examined formed normal bivalents. A, triangularis has an opposite phyllotaxis, while A. rosea has an alternate one. Segrega-tion of the F2 for the phyllotaxis was accounted for by assigning two recessive genes to the alternate form. The bundle sheath cells of F2 were many in number but small in size. A very small number of chloroplasts were sporadically observed in the bundle sheath cells in a few plants. Photosynthetic properties of the F2 were examlned in terms of light-photosynthetic curves, transpiration rates and carbon isotope discrimination values (δl3C). In some F3 plants observations were made on the C02 compensation points, photo-respiration activities and several enzyme activities relating to the C4 photosynthesis. No plants with C4-like photosynthetic activities have been found in the F2 nor F3, so far. Possible reasons why no C4-Iike plants were found in the F2 were discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross progeny were identified as hybrids by morphology and carbon isotope values.

Taxon
Atriplex triangularisAtriplex prostratat0
Outcome
hybrids in views of morphology and δl3C valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex prostrata
Atriplex prostrata · Taxonhttp://legambientearcipelagotoscano.it (for the authorization see here ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants obtained by crosses between C3 and C4 species in Atriplex were determined to be hybrids in views of morphology and δl3C values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Atriplex triangularis (C3) and A. rosea (C4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The F1 plant from the A. triangularis × A. rosea cross had good pollen and seed fertility.

Taxon
A, triangularise0
Material
F1e0
Outcome
good pollen and seed fertilitiese0

Verbatim

e0

“One F1 plant of A, triangularis (C3, n=9) x A, rosea (C4, n=9) and one of the reciprocal cross had good pollen and seed fertilities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–271 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reciprocal F1 plant had good pollen and seed fertility.

Taxon
A, roseae0
Material
reciprocal crosse0
Outcome
good pollen and seed fertilitiese0

Verbatim

e0

“One F1 plant of A, triangularis (C3, n=9) x A, rosea (C4, n=9) and one of the reciprocal cross had good pollen and seed fertilities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–271 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reciprocal F1 plants had no prominent morphological differences.

Taxon
Atriplex triangularisAtriplex prostratat0
Outcome
morphological characterse0
Direction
No prominent differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex prostrata
Atriplex prostrata · Taxonhttp://legambientearcipelagotoscano.it (for the authorization see here ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No prominent differences were observed between these reciprocal Fis in morphological characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–368 · show in text ↑
t0

“Atriplex triangularis (C3) and A. rosea (C4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most F2 plants had pollen fertility above 70%.

Taxon
Atriplex triangularisAtriplex prostratat0
Material
F2 plantse0
Outcome
pollen fertilitye0
Direction
highe0
Value
more than 70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex prostrata
Atriplex prostrata · Taxonhttp://legambientearcipelagotoscano.it (for the authorization see here ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the F2 plants showed a high pollen fertility (more than 70%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Atriplex triangularis (C3) and A. rosea (C4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal bivalents formed in 19 of 20 examined F2 plants.

Taxon
Atriplex triangularisAtriplex prostratat0
Outcome
formed normal bivalentse0
Value
19 out of the 20 plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex prostrata
Atriplex prostrata · Taxonhttp://legambientearcipelagotoscano.it (for the authorization see here ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“19 out of the 20 plants so far examined formed normal bivalents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Atriplex triangularis (C3) and A. rosea (C4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. triangularis had opposite phyllotaxis.

Taxon
A, triangularise0
Outcome
opposite phyllotaxise0

Verbatim

e0

“A, triangularis has an opposite phyllotaxis, while A. rosea has an alternate one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–589 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 phyllotaxis segregation was explained by two recessive genes for the alternate form.

Taxon
Atriplex triangularisAtriplex prostratat0
Gene
two recessive genese0
Outcome
phyllotaxise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex prostrata
Atriplex prostrata · Taxonhttp://legambientearcipelagotoscano.it (for the authorization see here ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Segrega-tion of the F2 for the phyllotaxis was accounted for by assigning two recessive genes to the alternate form.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Atriplex triangularis (C3) and A. rosea (C4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 bundle sheath cells were numerous but small.

Taxon
Atriplex triangularisAtriplex prostratat0
Organ / stage
bundle sheath cellse0
Outcome
many in number but small in sizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex prostrata
Atriplex prostrata · Taxonhttp://legambientearcipelagotoscano.it (for the authorization see here ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bundle sheath cells of F2 were many in number but small in size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“Atriplex triangularis (C3) and A. rosea (C4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A few F2 plants had sporadic chloroplasts in bundle sheath cells.

Taxon
Atriplex triangularisAtriplex prostratat0
Organ / stage
bundle sheath cellse0
Outcome
chloroplasts were sporadically observede0
Qualifier
in a few plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex prostrata
Atriplex prostrata · Taxonhttp://legambientearcipelagotoscano.it (for the authorization see here ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A very small number of chloroplasts were sporadically observed in the bundle sheath cells in a few plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Atriplex triangularis (C3) and A. rosea (C4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No F2 plants with C4-like photosynthetic activity were found.

Taxon
Atriplex triangularisAtriplex prostratat0
Material
F2e0
Outcome
No plants with C4-like photosynthetic activitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex prostrata
Atriplex prostrata · Taxonhttp://legambientearcipelagotoscano.it (for the authorization see here ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No plants with C4-like photosynthetic activities have been found in the F2 nor F3, so far.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Atriplex triangularis (C3) and A. rosea (C4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No F3 plants with C4-like photosynthetic activity were found.

Taxon
Atriplex triangularisAtriplex prostratat0
Material
F3e0
Outcome
No plants with C4-like photosynthetic activitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex prostrata
Atriplex prostrata · Taxonhttp://legambientearcipelagotoscano.it (for the authorization see here ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No plants with C4-like photosynthetic activities have been found in the F2 nor F3, so far.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Atriplex triangularis (C3) and A. rosea (C4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–144 · show in text ↑