Paper · 2002 · Tree Physiology

Physiological traits of two Populus x euramericana clones, Luisa Avanzo and Dorskamp, during a water stress and re-watering cycle

N. Marron; D. Delay; J.-M. Petit; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
135
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

We compared responses to drought and re-watering of greenhouse-grown cuttings of Populus x euramericana (Dode) Guinier clones, Luisa Avanzo and Dorskamp. Total leaf area, leaf number, leaf area increment and stomatal conductance were evaluated periodically during a 29-day drought period and for 16 days after re-watering. Soil water content and predawn leaf water potential (Psi(wp)) were measured on Days 29 and 45. On the same days, relative water content (RWC), specific leaf area (SLA), nitrogen, chlorophyll, soluble sugars, total phenols, flavanols and antioxidant activity were determined for leaves taken from the bottom to the top of each cutting. Leaves of Luisa Avanzo cuttings grew more rapidly than leaves of Dorskamp and exhibited higher SLA, but lower concentrations of nitrogen, chlorophyll and soluble sugars and lower antioxidant activity per unit area. On Day 29, after withholding water, both clones had closed their stomata, reduced rates of leaf growth, and lower Psi(wp) and RWC; however, the clones differed in their responses to soil water depletion. Compared to Dorskamp, Luisa Avanzo closed its stomata earlier and maintained higher Psi(wp), but lower RWC and leaf sugar concentrations. Antioxidant activity of leaf methanolic extracts decreased in response to water stress only in Luisa Avanzo. Leaf physiology and its modulation by water stress were age dependent in Luisa Avanzo.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Luisa Avanzo leaves grew faster than Dorskamp leaves.

Taxon
Populus x euramericanaPopulus ×canadensist0
Material
Luisa Avanzoe0
Outcome
Leavese0
Direction
more rapidlye0
Comparator
Dorskampe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus x canadensis
Populus ×canadensis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves of Luisa Avanzo cuttings grew more rapidly than leaves of Dorskamp and exhibited higher SLA, but lower concentrations of nitrogen, chlorophyll and soluble sugars and lower antioxidant activity per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus x euramericana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Luisa Avanzo leaves had higher SLA than Dorskamp.

Taxon
Populus x euramericanaPopulus ×canadensist0
Material
Luisa Avanzoe0
Outcome
SLAe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Dorskampe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus x canadensis
Populus ×canadensis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves of Luisa Avanzo cuttings grew more rapidly than leaves of Dorskamp and exhibited higher SLA, but lower concentrations of nitrogen, chlorophyll and soluble sugars and lower antioxidant activity per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus x euramericana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Luisa Avanzo had lower leaf nitrogen, chlorophyll, and soluble sugar concentrations.

Taxon
Populus x euramericanaPopulus ×canadensist0
Material
Luisa Avanzoe0
Outcome
concentrations of nitrogen, chlorophyll and soluble sugarse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Dorskampe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus x canadensis
Populus ×canadensis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves of Luisa Avanzo cuttings grew more rapidly than leaves of Dorskamp and exhibited higher SLA, but lower concentrations of nitrogen, chlorophyll and soluble sugars and lower antioxidant activity per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus x euramericana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Luisa Avanzo had lower leaf antioxidant activity per area.

Taxon
Populus x euramericanaPopulus ×canadensist0
Material
Luisa Avanzoe1
Outcome
antioxidant activity per unit areae0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus x canadensis
Populus ×canadensis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower antioxidant activity per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus x euramericana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaves of Luisa Avanzo cuttings grew more rapidly than leaves of Dorskamp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both clones closed stomata after water withholding.

Taxon
Populus x euramericanaPopulus ×canadensist0
Treatment
withholding watere0
Outcome
closed their stomatae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus x canadensis
Populus ×canadensis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On Day 29, after withholding water, both clones had closed their stomata, reduced rates of leaf growth, and lower Psi(wp) and RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus x euramericana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both clones reduced leaf growth under water withholding.

Taxon
Populus x euramericanaPopulus ×canadensist0
Treatment
withholding watere0
Outcome
rates of leaf growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus x canadensis
Populus ×canadensis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On Day 29, after withholding water, both clones had closed their stomata, reduced rates of leaf growth, and lower Psi(wp) and RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus x euramericana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both clones had lower predawn water potential and relative water content after water withholding.

Taxon
Populus x euramericanaPopulus ×canadensist0
Treatment
withholding watere0
Outcome
Psi(wp) and RWCe0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus x canadensis
Populus ×canadensis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On Day 29, after withholding water, both clones had closed their stomata, reduced rates of leaf growth, and lower Psi(wp) and RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus x euramericana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Luisa Avanzo closed stomata earlier than Dorskamp.

Taxon
Populus x euramericanaPopulus ×canadensist0
Material
Luisa Avanzoe0
Outcome
closed its stomatae0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
Dorskampe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus x canadensis
Populus ×canadensis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to Dorskamp, Luisa Avanzo closed its stomata earlier and maintained higher Psi(wp), but lower RWC and leaf sugar concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus x euramericana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Luisa Avanzo maintained higher predawn water potential than Dorskamp.

Taxon
Populus x euramericanaPopulus ×canadensist0
Material
Luisa Avanzoe0
Outcome
Psi(wp)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Dorskampe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus x canadensis
Populus ×canadensis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to Dorskamp, Luisa Avanzo closed its stomata earlier and maintained higher Psi(wp), but lower RWC and leaf sugar concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus x euramericana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Luisa Avanzo had lower RWC and leaf sugar concentrations than Dorskamp.

Taxon
Populus x euramericanaPopulus ×canadensist0
Material
Luisa Avanzoe0
Outcome
RWC and leaf sugar concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Dorskampe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus x canadensis
Populus ×canadensis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to Dorskamp, Luisa Avanzo closed its stomata earlier and maintained higher Psi(wp), but lower RWC and leaf sugar concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus x euramericana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced leaf antioxidant activity only in Luisa Avanzo.

Taxon
Populus x euramericanaPopulus ×canadensist0
Material
Luisa Avanzoe0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
Antioxidant activity of leaf methanolic extractse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus x canadensis
Populus ×canadensis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidant activity of leaf methanolic extracts decreased in response to water stress only in Luisa Avanzo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus x euramericana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf physiological response to water stress depended on age in Luisa Avanzo.

Taxon
Populus x euramericanaPopulus ×canadensist0
Material
Luisa Avanzoe0
Organ / stage
agee0
Outcome
Leaf physiology and its modulation by water stresse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus x canadensis
Populus ×canadensis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf physiology and its modulation by water stress were age dependent in Luisa Avanzo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus x euramericana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Populus x canadensis (hybrid black poplar)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Populus x canadensis (hybrid black poplar)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.