Paper · 1949 · Hilgardia

A lysimeter investigation of nitrogen gains and losses under various systems of covercropping and fertilization, and a discussion of error sources

H. D. Chapman; G. F. Liebig; D. S. Rayner

17
claims
31
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The Results in Brief The net gain or loss of soil nitrogen was studied in lysimeters at Riverside for ten years under four series of treatments: (1) fall applications of cereal straw (5,000 pounds per acre); (2) a mustard winter covercrop; (3) purple-vetch winter covercrop; (4) sweet-clover winter covercrop. In each series, one lysimeter was given no fertilizer, one 100 pounds, and one 200 pounds of nitrogen per acre per year as nitrate. A summer-harvested crop (first barley, later Sudan grass) was grown in all lysimeters. Total nitrogen and organic matter in the soil at the outset and at five-year intervals, amounts of nitrogen removed by cropping and leaching, and amounts added in seed, rain, irrigation water, and fertilizer were recorded. Unaccounted-for net losses of nitrogen, thought to be due to gaseous volatilization, amounted to more than 60 pounds per acre per year with a mustard covercrop when 200 pounds of nitrogen per acre was added in fertilizer. Similar losses occurred with cereal-straw applications and 200 pounds of nitrogen. Net gains of nitrogen when legume covercrops were grown without fertilization amounted to about 150 pounds per acre per year. These net gains were progressively reduced when 100 and 200 pounds of nitrogen per acre per year was added in fertilizer. Net gains of nitrogen due to nonsymbiotic fixation amounted to 48 pounds per acre per year when dry cereal straw was applied without fertilization; they amounted to 40 pounds per acre per year when a mustard covercrop was grown without fertilization. Average loss of nitrogen through leaching varied from 4 to 88 pounds per acre per year. It was highest when no winter covercrop was grown and with heavy nitrogen fertilization, considerably higher with legume covercrops than with mustard. Most of the losses occurred in years of heavy rainfall or when rain fell just after an irrigation, since irrigation was designed to just meet the water requirements of the crops grown. The nitrogen requirements of Sudan grass—about 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre per year for maximum yields—were fully met through the nitrogen fixed by legume covercrops: yields were not increased by nitrogen fertilizer when legume covercrops were grown, although the fertilizer increased the growth of the legumes. The nitrogen added in cereal straw (22 pounds per acre per year), in rain and irrigation water (7 pounds), and by nonsymbiotic fixation (48 pounds) was not enough to meet the requirements of the Sudan grass. These results indicate that high-level nitrogen fertilization is wasteful. If much more nitrogen is applied than the crops need, substantial amounts will be lost by gaseous volatilization and by leaching, fixation will be reduced, and luxury consumption of nitrogen by crops may occur without benefit to yield or quality. Therefore, greatest nitrogen economy will be achieved when nitrogen is maintained at the lowest possible point consistent with satisfactory crop performance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard covercropping with 200 pounds of fertilizer nitrogen was associated with unaccounted nitrogen loss exceeding 60 pounds per acre per year.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
200 pounds of nitrogen per acree0
Outcome
Unaccounted-for net losses of nitrogene0
Value
more than 60 pounds per acre per yeare0
Qualifier
thought to be due to gaseous volatilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Unaccounted-for net losses of nitrogen, thought to be due to gaseous volatilization, amounted to more than 60 pounds per acre per year with a mustard covercrop when 200 pounds of nitrogen per acre was added in fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–972 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cereal straw with 200 pounds of nitrogen also produced similar unaccounted nitrogen losses.

Taxon
cereal strawe1
Treatment
200 pounds of nitrogene0
Outcome
Similar lossese0

Verbatim

e0

“Similar losses occurred with cereal-straw applications and 200 pounds of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“fall applications of cereal straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–182 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unfertilized legume covercrops yielded net nitrogen gains of about 150 pounds per acre per year.

Taxon
legume covercropse0
Treatment
without fertilizatione0
Outcome
Net gains of nitrogene0
Value
about 150 pounds per acre per yeare0

Verbatim

e0

“Net gains of nitrogen when legume covercrops were grown without fertilization amounted to about 150 pounds per acre per year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 100 or 200 pounds of nitrogen progressively reduced net nitrogen gains under legume covercrops.

Taxon
legume covercropse1
Treatment
100 and 200 pounds of nitrogen per acre per yeare0
Outcome
net gainse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
without fertilizatione1

Verbatim

e0

“These net gains were progressively reduced when 100 and 200 pounds of nitrogen per acre per year was added in fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1303 · show in text ↑
e1

“Net gains of nitrogen when legume covercrops were grown without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unfertilized cereal straw application had 48 pounds per acre per year of nitrogen gain from nonsymbiotic fixation.

Taxon
cereal strawe0
Treatment
without fertilizatione0
Outcome
Net gains of nitrogen due to nonsymbiotic fixatione0
Value
48 pounds per acre per yeare0

Verbatim

e0

“Net gains of nitrogen due to nonsymbiotic fixation amounted to 48 pounds per acre per year when dry cereal straw was applied without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1451 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unfertilized mustard covercropping had 40 pounds per acre per year of nitrogen gain from nonsymbiotic fixation.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
without fertilizatione0
Outcome
Net gains of nitrogen due to nonsymbiotic fixatione1
Value
40 pounds per acre per yeare0

Verbatim

e0

“they amounted to 40 pounds per acre per year when a mustard covercrop was grown without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1554 · show in text ↑
e1

“Net gains of nitrogen due to nonsymbiotic fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1355 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average nitrogen loss by leaching ranged from 4 to 88 pounds per acre per year.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiie1
Outcome
Average loss of nitrogen through leachinge0
Value
4 to 88 pounds per acre per yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average loss of nitrogen through leaching varied from 4 to 88 pounds per acre per year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1642 · show in text ↑
e1

“A summer-harvested crop (first barley, later Sudan grass) was grown in all lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–527 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen leaching was greatest without winter covercrop and with heavy nitrogen fertilizer.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiie2
Treatment
heavy nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
Average loss of nitrogen through leachinge1
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was highest when no winter covercrop was grown and with heavy nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1731 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average loss of nitrogen through leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1597 · show in text ↑
e2

“A summer-harvested crop (first barley, later Sudan grass) was grown in all lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–527 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaching losses were considerably higher under legume covercrops than mustard.

Taxon
legume covercropse0
Outcome
Average loss of nitrogen through leachinge1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
mustarde0

Verbatim

e0

“considerably higher with legume covercrops than with mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1733–1793 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average loss of nitrogen through leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1597 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most leaching losses occurred in heavy rainfall years or when rain followed irrigation.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiie2
Outcome
Average loss of nitrogen through leachinge1
Qualifier
years of heavy rainfall or when rain fell just after an irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the losses occurred in years of heavy rainfall or when rain fell just after an irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1892 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average loss of nitrogen through leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1597 · show in text ↑
e2

“A summer-harvested crop (first barley, later Sudan grass) was grown in all lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–527 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sudan grass needed about 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre per year for maximum yields.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiie0
Outcome
nitrogen requirementse0
Value
about 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre per yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen requirements of Sudan grass—about 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre per year for maximum yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1980–2086 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fixed by legume covercrops fully met the nitrogen requirements of Sudan grass.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiie1
Outcome
nitrogen requirementse1
Direction
fully mete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were fully met through the nitrogen fixed by legume covercrops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2149 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nitrogen requirements of Sudan grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1980–2020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer did not increase Sudan grass yields with legume covercrops.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiie1
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
not increasede0
Qualifier
when legume covercrops were growne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields were not increased by nitrogen fertilizer when legume covercrops were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2151–2233 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nitrogen requirements of Sudan grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1980–2020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer increased legume growth.

Taxon
legumese0
Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
growth of the legumese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
without fertilizatione1

Verbatim

e0

“the fertilizer increased the growth of the legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2244–2294 · show in text ↑
e1

“legume covercrops were grown without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen supplied by cereal straw, rain and irrigation water, and nonsymbiotic fixation was insufficient for Sudan grass requirements.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiie0
Outcome
requirements of the Sudan grasse0
Direction
not enoughe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen added in cereal straw (22 pounds per acre per year), in rain and irrigation water (7 pounds), and by nonsymbiotic fixation (48 pounds) was not enough to meet the requirements of the Sudan grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2296–2502 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that high-level nitrogen fertilization is wasteful.

Taxon
cropse1
Outcome
high-level nitrogen fertilization is wastefule0

Verbatim

e0

“These results indicate that high-level nitrogen fertilization is wasteful”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2504–2577 · show in text ↑
e1

“the crops need”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2617–2631 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend keeping nitrogen at the lowest level consistent with satisfactory crop performance.

Taxon
cropse1
Outcome
nitrogen is maintained at the lowest possible point consistent with satisfactory crop performancee0

Verbatim

e0

“greatest nitrogen economy will be achieved when nitrogen is maintained at the lowest possible point consistent with satisfactory crop performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2837–2982 · show in text ↑
e1

“the crops need”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2617–2631 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Sorghum x drummondii (Sudan grass)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.