Paper · 1998 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Effects of split application of nitrogen on yield and nitrogen recovery of spring-sown onions and on residual nitrogen

C. L. De Visser

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryThe recovery of nitrogen (N) by a crop and its subsequent use for production can potentially be increased by the split application of N. The significance of this strategy for onions was tested in seven field experiments on Dutch clay soils from 1991 to 1994. An experimental recommendation system consisting of split N application accounting for soil mineral N by replenishing the soil mineral N with fertilizer N up to a crop stage-dependent threshold value, was compared with the pre-sowing fixed N rate of 100 kg ha–1 which is the current recommendation to farmers in the Netherlands. The experimental recommendation system resulted in an average application rate of 72–110 kg N ha–1 for a three-way respectively two-way N splitting. A loss of yield was not observed. Reduction of the threshold values used in the experimental recommendation system could further reduce the total N rate without yield loss. As onion growth until the 3–4 leaf stage did not appear to be influenced by the N rate before sowing, a soil sampling before sowing can be omitted from the sampling scheme of the experimental recommendation system. N splitting did not affect the estimated N loss during the growing season, the residual N in soil or the apparent recovery rate of the N applied. However, these variables were significantly influenced by the total N rate, which indicated that N loss to the environment could only be decreased by either lowering the fixed N rate before sowing or lowering the threshold values of the experimental recommendation system. However, the latter can be advantageous because the soil mineralization in spring is taken into account thereby adjusting for possible spring N losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The experimental recommendation system resulted in an average onion application rate of 72–110 kg N ha–1 for two- or three-way N splitting.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepat0
Treatment
experimental recommendation systeme0
Outcome
average application ratee0
Value
72–110 kg N ha–1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring-sown onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experimental recommendation system resulted in an average application rate of 72–110 kg N ha–1 for a three-way respectively two-way N splitting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The experimental recommendation system did not cause a loss of onion yield compared with the pre-sowing fixed N rate of 100 kg ha–1.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepat0
Treatment
experimental recommendation systeme0
Outcome
loss of yielde1
Direction
was not observede1
Comparator
pre-sowing fixed N rate of 100 kg ha–1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring-sown onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experimental recommendation system resulted in an average application rate of 72–110 kg N ha–1 for a three-way respectively two-way N splitting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–742 · show in text ↑
e1

“A loss of yield was not observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–776 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with the pre-sowing fixed N rate of 100 kg ha–1 which is the current recommendation to farmers in the Netherlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–593 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing the threshold values of the experimental recommendation system could further reduce the total N rate for onions without yield loss.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepat0
Treatment
Reduction of the threshold valuese3
Outcome
total N ratee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring-sown onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
e3

“Reduction of the threshold values used in the experimental recommendation system could further reduce the total N rate without yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N splitting did not affect the estimated N loss during the growing season, the residual N in soil or the apparent recovery rate of onion N.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepat0
Treatment
N splittinge4
Outcome
the estimated N loss during the growing season, the residual N in soil or the apparent recovery ratee4
Direction
did not affecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring-sown onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
e4

“N splitting did not affect the estimated N loss during the growing season, the residual N in soil or the apparent recovery rate of the N applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1276 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N rate significantly influenced the estimated N loss, residual N and apparent recovery rate of onion N.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepat0
Treatment
total N ratee5
Outcome
these variablese5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring-sown onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“these variables were significantly influenced by the total N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1352 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

N loss to the environment in onion production could only be decreased by lowering the fixed N rate before sowing or the threshold values.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepat0
Treatment
lowering the fixed N rate before sowing or lowering the threshold valuese6
Outcome
N loss to the environmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring-sown onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
e6

“N loss to the environment could only be decreased by either lowering the fixed N rate before sowing or lowering the threshold values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1507 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A soil sampling before sowing can be omitted from the sampling scheme of the experimental recommendation system for onions.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepat0
Treatment
N rate before sowinge7
Outcome
soil sampling before sowinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring-sown onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
e7

“As onion growth until the 3–4 leaf stage did not appear to be influenced by the N rate before sowing, a soil sampling before sowing can be omitted from the sampling scheme of the experimental recommendation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion growth until the 3–4 leaf stage did not appear to be influenced by the N rate before sowing.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepat0
Organ / stage
3–4 leaf stagee7
Treatment
N rate before sowinge7
Outcome
onion growth until the 3–4 leaf stagee7
Direction
did not appear to be influencede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring-sown onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
e7

“As onion growth until the 3–4 leaf stage did not appear to be influenced by the N rate before sowing, a soil sampling before sowing can be omitted from the sampling scheme of the experimental recommendation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1130 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

81 papers: 71 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.