Paper · 1985 · Journal of Horticultural Science

Impact of etaconazole and benomyl on powdery mildew, leaf characteristics, growth and yield of Rome Beauty apple trees

T. R. Roper; D. J. Weber; W. R. Andersen

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryTwo fungicides, etaconazole and benomyl, used to control powdery mildew (Podosphaera leucotricha [Ell. et. ev.] Salm) on apples were tested for their effects on the growth and leaf characteristics of cv Rome Beauty apple trees and seedlings (Malus sylvestris, Mill*). Etaconazole is a sterol-inhibiting fungicide and benomyl a non-sterol-inhibiting fungicide. Compared to the controls, etaconazole treatment caused shorter internodes and a smaller leaf area in both greenhouse-grown seedlings and orchard trees. The etaconazole-treated trees, however, produced greater fruit yields than the unsprayed control trees that had high mildew infection. Benomyl did not control the mildew as well as etaconazole and also did not produce as pronounced an effect on growth.*Commonly designated M. pumila

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Etaconazole shortened internodes in apple seedlings and orchard trees compared with controls.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
etaconazole treatmente0
Outcome
internodese0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
the controlse0
Setting
greenhouse-grown seedlings and orchard treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the controls, etaconazole treatment caused shorter internodes and a smaller leaf area in both greenhouse-grown seedlings and orchard trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rome Beauty apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Etaconazole reduced leaf area in apple seedlings and orchard trees compared with controls.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
etaconazole treatmente0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
the controlse0
Setting
greenhouse-grown seedlings and orchard treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the controls, etaconazole treatment caused shorter internodes and a smaller leaf area in both greenhouse-grown seedlings and orchard trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rome Beauty apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Etaconazole-treated apple trees produced greater fruit yields than unsprayed control trees with high mildew infection.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
etaconazole-treatede0
Outcome
fruit yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
high mildew infectione0
Comparator
unsprayed control treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The etaconazole-treated trees, however, produced greater fruit yields than the unsprayed control trees that had high mildew infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rome Beauty apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl controlled mildew less well than etaconazole.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
Benomyle0
Outcome
mildewe0
Direction
did not control the mildew as welle0
Comparator
etaconazolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benomyl did not control the mildew as well as etaconazole and also did not produce as pronounced an effect on growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rome Beauty apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl had a less pronounced effect on apple growth than etaconazole.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
Benomyle0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
did not produce as pronounced an effecte0
Comparator
etaconazolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benomyl did not control the mildew as well as etaconazole and also did not produce as pronounced an effect on growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rome Beauty apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–233 · show in text ↑

benomyl · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.