Paper · 1992 · Journal of Horticultural Science

Influences of gibberellins A4, A4+7, and A4+iso—A7on apple fruit quality and tree productivity. I. Effects on fruit russet and tree yield components

N. E. Looney,; R. L. Granger; C. L. Chu,; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
24
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Mature ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees in British Columbia (B.C.) and Québec, Canada and Cox’s Orange Pippin apple in Canterbury, New Zealand were sprayed weekly for four weeks, commencing at petal fall, with formulations of GA4, GA4+7 mixture (1:1) or GA4+iso—GA7 (a less active isomer). This study was predicated on previous work suggesting that GA4 is more effective than GA7 for fruit russet control and is less likely than GA7 to inhibit return flowering. It was hypothesized that conversion of GA7 in the GA4+7 mixture to iso—GA7 might ameliorate the expected negative effect of the GA treatment on return flowering. Surface russet was prevalent on Québec ‘Golden Delicious’ and all GA treatments reduced its severity. Stem-end russet was reduced by GA4+iso—GA7 in the B.C. ‘Golden Delicious’ trial but none of the treatments influenced stem-end russet of New Zealand ‘Cox’s Orange Pippin’. All G As and GA mixtures reduced fruit set and seed number per fruit and increased average fruit weight in one or more experiments. There were clear indications that iso—GA7 does have biological activity, at least when applied with GA4. Most importantly, return flowering of ‘Cox’s Orange Pippin’ was less adversely affected by GA4+iso—GA7 than by the original GA4+7 mixture. GA4 (7.5 mg T1) promoted return flowering of ‘Golden Delicious’ in British Columbia whereas 15 mg/l/GA4+7, GA4+iso—GA7 and GA4 were ineffective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All GA treatments reduced surface russet on Québec Golden Delicious.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
all GA treatmentse0
Outcome
Surface russete0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
Québece0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Surface russet was prevalent on Québec ‘Golden Delicious’ and all GA treatments reduced its severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA4+iso—GA7 reduced stem-end russet on British Columbia Golden Delicious.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
GA4+iso—GA7e0
Outcome
Stem-end russete0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
B.C.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem-end russet was reduced by GA4+iso—GA7 in the B.C. ‘Golden Delicious’ trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA treatments did not influence stem-end russet in New Zealand Cox’s Orange Pippin.

Material
Cox’s Orange Pippine0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
stem-end russete0
Direction
nonee0
Setting
New Zealande0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of the treatments influenced stem-end russet of New Zealand ‘Cox’s Orange Pippin’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA treatments reduced apple fruit set in at least one experiment.

Treatment
G As and GA mixturese0
Outcome
fruit set and seed number per fruite0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
one or more experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All G As and GA mixtures reduced fruit set and seed number per fruit and increased average fruit weight in one or more experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA treatments increased average apple fruit weight in at least one experiment.

Treatment
G As and GA mixturese0
Outcome
average fruit weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
one or more experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All G As and GA mixtures reduced fruit set and seed number per fruit and increased average fruit weight in one or more experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iso—GA7 showed biological activity when applied with GA4.

Treatment
iso—GA7e0
Outcome
biological activitye0
Qualifier
at least when applied with GA4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were clear indications that iso—GA7 does have biological activity, at least when applied with GA4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA4+iso—GA7 affected return flowering less adversely than GA4+7 in Cox’s Orange Pippin.

Material
Cox’s Orange Pippine0
Treatment
GA4+iso—GA7e0
Outcome
return floweringe0
Direction
less adversely affectede0
Comparator
original GA4+7 mixturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“return flowering of ‘Cox’s Orange Pippin’ was less adversely affected by GA4+iso—GA7 than by the original GA4+7 mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA4 promoted return flowering of Golden Delicious in British Columbia.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
GA4 (7.5 mg T1)e0
Outcome
return floweringe0
Direction
promotede0
Setting
British Columbiae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA4 (7.5 mg T1) promoted return flowering of ‘Golden Delicious’ in British Columbia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 15 mg/l, GA4+7 was ineffective for Golden Delicious return flowering.

Treatment
15 mg/l/GA4+7e0
Outcome
return floweringe1
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15 mg/l/GA4+7, GA4+iso—GA7 and GA4 were ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“return flowering of ‘Golden Delicious’ in British Columbia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 15 mg/l, GA4+iso—GA7 was ineffective for Golden Delicious return flowering.

Treatment
GA4+iso—GA7e0
Outcome
return floweringe1
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15 mg/l/GA4+7, GA4+iso—GA7 and GA4 were ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“return flowering of ‘Golden Delicious’ in British Columbia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 15 mg/l, GA4 was ineffective for Golden Delicious return flowering.

Treatment
GA4e0
Outcome
return floweringe1
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15 mg/l/GA4+7, GA4+iso—GA7 and GA4 were ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“return flowering of ‘Golden Delicious’ in British Columbia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1355 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 16 positive, 11 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.