Paper · 1983 · Seibutsu kankyō chōsetsu/Seibutsu kankyou chousetsu

Effect of Excess Accumulation of Salts on Outbreak of Blossom-End Rot of Tomato and Population of Microorganisms in Soil Environment

Yoshihisa OHNISHI; Koji YOSHIDA; Ryosei KAYAMA

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of successive fertilization of the excess farmyard manure on the tomato yield, the occurrence of blossom-end rot and change of meso-faunas and microorganisms population in soil were studied under greenhouse condition. The results obtained were as follows.The farmyard manure used in this study contained 2.8% nitrogen, 2.8% potassium and 2.4% calcium.The fruit yield obtained from the plot which was supplied 5 t/10 a farmyard manure was 1.2 t/10 a more than that from 50 t/10 a at the first cropping. But, the yield from heavily manured plot and that from light manured plot were reversed at 2nd cropping.In the 3rd cropping, the fruit yield reached the maximum during all croppings, even when blossom-end rot occurred. Outbreak and severity of blossom-end rot increased by fertilization of heavy manure and by accumulation of salts. Accordingly, in the 4th (1981) and the 5th (1982) croppings the fruit yields decreased markedly by blossom-end rot and Fusarium wilt.Blossom-end rot and disorders of tomatoes increased with a decreasing K/Ca ratio in the culture soil. The K/Ca ratios in the soils of 2nd and 3rd cropping which supplied 50 t/10 a farmyard manure were 0.25 and 0.2, respectively.It seems that the increase of blossomend rot was caused by the salts accumulation and ammonium production at early fruiting season.The populations of bacteria and fungi in the soils which supplied 50 and 5 t/10 a farmyard manure and was disinfected and not-disinfected varied with the growth of crops.The populations of Nematoda, Enchytraeidae and Acari increased remarkably from 1st to 2nd cropping, but decreased suddenly in 3rd one. It is not clear whether this sudden change was caused by a saltaccumulation or any other complex factors.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the first cropping, the 5 t/10 a manure plot yielded 1.2 t/10 a more fruit than the 50 t/10 a plot.

Treatment
5 t/10 a farmyard manuree0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
1.2 t/10 ae0
Qualifier
at the first croppinge0
Comparator
50 t/10 ae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fruit yield obtained from the plot which was supplied 5 t/10 a farmyard manure was 1.2 t/10 a more than that from 50 t/10 a at the first cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield ranking of heavy and light manure plots reversed at the second cropping.

Treatment
heavily manured plote0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reversede0
Comparator
light manured plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the yield from heavily manured plot and that from light manured plot were reversed at 2nd cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–616 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield reached its maximum in the third cropping despite blossom-end rot.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the 3rd cropping, the fruit yield reached the maximum during all croppings, even when blossom-end rot occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy manure increased blossom-end rot outbreak and severity.

Treatment
fertilization of heavy manuree0
Outcome
Outbreak and severity of blossom-end rote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Outbreak and severity of blossom-end rot increased by fertilization of heavy manure and by accumulation of salts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–844 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt accumulation increased blossom-end rot outbreak and severity.

Treatment
accumulation of saltse0
Outcome
Outbreak and severity of blossom-end rote0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Outbreak and severity of blossom-end rot increased by fertilization of heavy manure and by accumulation of salts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–844 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yields decreased markedly in the fourth and fifth croppings with blossom-end rot and Fusarium wilt.

Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
fruit yieldse0
Direction
decreased markedlye0
Qualifier
4th (1981) and the 5th (1982) croppingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“in the 4th (1981) and the 5th (1982) croppings the fruit yields decreased markedly by blossom-end rot and Fusarium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–978 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blossom-end rot and tomato disorders increased as soil K/Ca ratio decreased.

Compound
K/Cae0
Outcome
Blossom-end rot and disorders of tomatoese0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Blossom-end rot and disorders of tomatoes increased with a decreasing K/Ca ratio in the culture soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1079 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed increased blossom-end rot to salt accumulation and ammonium production early in fruiting.

Compound
ammoniume0
Outcome
increase of blossomend rote0
Qualifier
at early fruiting seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“It seems that the increase of blossomend rot was caused by the salts accumulation and ammonium production at early fruiting season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1337 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bacteria and fungi populations varied with crop growth across manure and disinfection conditions.

Treatment
50 and 5 t/10 a farmyard manuree0
Outcome
populations of bacteria and fungie0
Qualifier
disinfected and not-disinfectede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“The populations of bacteria and fungi in the soils which supplied 50 and 5 t/10 a farmyard manure and was disinfected and not-disinfected varied with the growth of crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1507 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematoda populations rose from the first to second cropping and fell in the third.

Outcome
populations of Nematodae0
Direction
increased remarkablye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“The populations of Nematoda, Enchytraeidae and Acari increased remarkably from 1st to 2nd cropping, but decreased suddenly in 3rd one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1641 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enchytraeidae populations rose from the first to second cropping and fell in the third.

Outcome
Enchytraeidaee0
Direction
decreased suddenlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“The populations of Nematoda, Enchytraeidae and Acari increased remarkably from 1st to 2nd cropping, but decreased suddenly in 3rd one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1641 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acari populations rose from the first to second cropping and fell in the third.

Outcome
Acarie0
Direction
increased remarkablye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“The populations of Nematoda, Enchytraeidae and Acari increased remarkably from 1st to 2nd cropping, but decreased suddenly in 3rd one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1641 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 94 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.