Paper · 2004 · Seibutsu kankyō chōsetsu/Seibutsu kankyou chousetsu

Increased Tolerance to Fusarium Wilt in Mycorrhizal Strawberry Plants Raised by Capillary Watering Methods

Yoh-ichi MATSUBARA; Itsuka HIRANO; Daisuke SASSA; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tolerance to fusarium wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f, sp. fragariae (Fof), in strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa Duch., cv. Nohime) plants infected with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi (Gigaspora margarita, Glomus fasciculatum, Gl. mosseae, Gl. sp. R10, Gl. aggregatum) was estimated under capillary watering conditions. Thirty days after Fof inoculation, the incidence of fusarium wilt ranged from a minimum of 22.2% in Gl. mosseae plot and a maximum of 100% in non-AM one ; the incidence varied, depending on AM fungal species. Incidence and severity of browned vessels and roots became lower in AM plots than in non-AM one. Non-diseased and diseased AM plants had higher dry weight of shoots and roots than did diseased non-AM plants. No significant difference in phosphorus concentration in plants appeared between non-AM and AM plots 11 weeks after AM fungus inoculation (just before Fof inoculation) and 30 days after Fof inoculation. These findings suggest that tolerance to fusarium wilt occurred in AM fungusinfected strawberry plants, and the effect had less association with phosphorus concentration in plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium wilt incidence ranged from 22.2% with Gl. mosseae to 100% without AM fungi.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Gl. mosseaee0
Interactor
fusarium wilte0pathogen
Second interactor
Gl. mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
incidence of fusarium wilte0
Direction
minimume0
Value
22.2%e0
Qualifier
100%e0
Comparator
non-AM onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the incidence of fusarium wilt ranged from a minimum of 22.2% in Gl. mosseae plot and a maximum of 100% in non-AM one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Browned vessel and root incidence and severity were lower with AM fungi.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
AM plotse0
Outcome
Incidence and severity of browned vessels and rootse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
non-AM onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incidence and severity of browned vessels and roots became lower in AM plots than in non-AM one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-diseased and diseased AM plants had higher shoot and root dry weight than diseased non-AM plants.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
AM plantse0
Outcome
dry weight of shoots and rootse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
diseased non-AM plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Non-diseased and diseased AM plants had higher dry weight of shoots and roots than did diseased non-AM plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant phosphorus concentration did not significantly differ between AM and non-AM plots at either sampled time.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
AM plotse0
Outcome
phosphorus concentration in plantse0
Direction
No significant differencee0
Qualifier
11 weeks after AM fungus inoculation (just before Fof inoculation) and 30 days after Fof inoculatione0
Comparator
non-AMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant difference in phosphorus concentration in plants appeared between non-AM and AM plots 11 weeks after AM fungus inoculation (just before Fof inoculation) and 30 days after Fof inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.