Paper · 2011 · Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences(An International Journal)

Vermicomposting of sugarcane bagasse and rice straw and its effect on Phaseolus vulgaris in Guyana

Abdullah Adil Ansari; Sirpaul Jaikishun

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted during the year 2006–2007 at University of Guyana, Georgetown for production and comparison of vermicomposts from sugarcane bagasse and rice straw. The vermicomposts were assessed for nutrient value and effects on plant growth of Phaseolus vulgaris L. compared to cow dung and chemical fertilizer. Vermicompost showed better growth patterns and better fruit quality in Phaseolus vulgaris L. than chemical fertilizers and retained nutrients for longer period. There was significant improvement in soil quality with application of vermicompost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost gave better growth patterns in Phaseolus vulgaris than chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
Vermicomposte0
Outcome
growth patternse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse0
Setting
Guyanat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost showed better growth patterns and better fruit quality in Phaseolus vulgaris L. than chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–443 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guyana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost gave better fruit quality in Phaseolus vulgaris than chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
Vermicomposte0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse0
Setting
Guyanat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost showed better growth patterns and better fruit quality in Phaseolus vulgaris L. than chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–443 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guyana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost retained nutrients for a longer period than chemical fertilizer.

Outcome
retained nutrientse0
Direction
longer periode0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost showed better growth patterns and better fruit quality in Phaseolus vulgaris L. than chemical fertilizers and retained nutrients for longer period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost application significantly improved soil quality.

Treatment
application of vermicomposte0
Outcome
soil qualitye0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was significant improvement in soil quality with application of vermicompost.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–569 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

143 papers: 121 positive, 22 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

139 papers more in this group

See all 143 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.