Paper · 2013

RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) TO SOIL APPLIED BORON AND ZINC FERTILIZERS UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS

Muhammad Arif Ali; Nadeem Tariq; Nazeer Ahmed; et al.

8
claims
27
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted to evaluate the effect of boron (B) and zinc (Zn) fertilizer alone and in combination on yield, yield components and nutrient concentration in various plant parts. The treatments consisted of (a) untreated control (b) three levels of B (0, 1, 2 kg B ha -1 ) and (c) three levels of Zn (0, 5, 10 kg Zn ha -1 ). The basal dose of NPK at the rate of 150, 110, 60 kg ha -1 , respectively, was applied to all treatments except control. The treatments were arranged in randomized complete block design with four replications. Results showed that combined addition of 2.0 kg B and 5 kg Zn ha -1 produced significant impact on the grain yield and its components i.e., number of tillers m -2 , spike length, number of grains spike -1 and 1000-grain weight. The improvement in dry matter production and grain yield was 14.5% and 9.4%, over control, respectively, by the combined application of 2.0 kg B ha -1 and 5.0 kg Zn ha -1 . There was substantial increase in B concentration in grains i.e., 129.6% and 47.6% by individual addition of 2.0 kg B and 5.0 kg Zn ha -1 over control, respectively. The level of Zn content was raised from 15.2 to 37.4 mg kg -1 by application of 10.0 kg Zn ha -1 . Thus, substantial improvement in wheat productivity could be harvested with simultaneous increased concentration of Zn nutrient in grain for alleviation of syndrome caused due to Zn deficiency across rural and peri-urban communities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined addition of 2.0 kg B and 5 kg Zn ha-1 significantly affected wheat grain yield compared with untreated control.

Treatment
combined addition of 2.0 kg B and 5 kg Zn ha -1e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Comparator
untreated controle2
Setting
irrigated conditionst1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that combined addition of 2.0 kg B and 5 kg Zn ha -1 produced significant impact on the grain yield and its components i.e., number of tillers m -2 , spike length, number of grains spike -1 and 1000-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–774 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatments consisted of (a) untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined addition of 2.0 kg B and 5 kg Zn ha-1 significantly affected number of tillers per m2, spike length and number of grains per spike of wheat compared with untreated control.

Treatment
combined addition of 2.0 kg B and 5 kg Zn ha -1e1
Outcome
number of tillers m -2 , spike length, number of grains spike -1e1
Comparator
untreated controle2
Setting
irrigated conditionst1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that combined addition of 2.0 kg B and 5 kg Zn ha -1 produced significant impact on the grain yield and its components i.e., number of tillers m -2 , spike length, number of grains spike -1 and 1000-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–774 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatments consisted of (a) untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined addition of 2.0 kg B and 5 kg Zn ha-1 significantly affected 1000-grain weight of wheat compared with untreated control.

Treatment
combined addition of 2.0 kg B and 5 kg Zn ha -1e1
Outcome
1000-grain weighte1
Comparator
untreated controle2
Setting
irrigated conditionst1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that combined addition of 2.0 kg B and 5 kg Zn ha -1 produced significant impact on the grain yield and its components i.e., number of tillers m -2 , spike length, number of grains spike -1 and 1000-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–774 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatments consisted of (a) untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application of 2.0 kg B ha-1 and 5.0 kg Zn ha-1 improved wheat dry matter production by 14.5% over control.

Treatment
combined application of 2.0 kg B ha -1 and 5.0 kg Zn ha -1e3
Outcome
dry matter productione3
Direction
improvemente3
Value
14.5%e3
Comparator
over controle3
Setting
irrigated conditionst1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“The improvement in dry matter production and grain yield was 14.5% and 9.4%, over control, respectively, by the combined application of 2.0 kg B ha -1 and 5.0 kg Zn ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application of 2.0 kg B ha-1 and 5.0 kg Zn ha-1 improved wheat grain yield by 9.4% over control.

Treatment
combined application of 2.0 kg B ha -1 and 5.0 kg Zn ha -1e3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
improvemente3
Value
9.4%e3
Comparator
over controle3
Setting
irrigated conditionst1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“The improvement in dry matter production and grain yield was 14.5% and 9.4%, over control, respectively, by the combined application of 2.0 kg B ha -1 and 5.0 kg Zn ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual addition of 2.0 kg B ha-1 substantially increased B concentration in wheat grain by 129.6% over control.

Treatment
individual addition of 2.0 kg Be4
Outcome
B concentration in grainse4
Direction
substantial increasee4
Value
129.6%e4
Comparator
over controle4
Setting
irrigated conditionst1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e4

“There was substantial increase in B concentration in grains i.e., 129.6% and 47.6% by individual addition of 2.0 kg B and 5.0 kg Zn ha -1 over control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual addition of 5.0 kg Zn ha-1 substantially increased B concentration in wheat grain by 47.6% over control.

Treatment
5.0 kg Zn ha -1e4
Outcome
B concentration in grainse4
Direction
substantial increasee4
Value
47.6%e4
Comparator
over controle4
Setting
irrigated conditionst1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e4

“There was substantial increase in B concentration in grains i.e., 129.6% and 47.6% by individual addition of 2.0 kg B and 5.0 kg Zn ha -1 over control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 10.0 kg Zn ha-1 raised wheat grain Zn content from 15.2 to 37.4 mg kg-1.

Treatment
application of 10.0 kg Zn ha -1e5
Outcome
Zn contente5
Direction
raisede5
Value
from 15.2 to 37.4 mg kg -1e5
Setting
irrigated conditionst1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e5

“The level of Zn content was raised from 15.2 to 37.4 mg kg -1 by application of 10.0 kg Zn ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1211 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.