Paper · 1989 · Cereal Chemistry

Effect of Gamma Irradiation on the Nutritional Quality of Grains and Legumes. II. Changes in Amino Acid Profiles and Available Lysine

Amal Badshah Khattak; C. F. Klopfenstein

3
claims
9
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cereal Chem. 66(3):171-172 Wheat, maize, chickpea, and mung bean seeds were irradiated at 0.5, 1.0, amino acids were radiation labile, particularly in the legumes. Significant 2.5, and 5.0 kGy in a cobalt-60 gamma cell. Nonirradiated seeds served as losses in all cultivars also were noted for lysine, tyrosine, and isoleucine. controls. Comparison of amino acid profiles showed that sulfur-containing However, the percent available lysine was higher in the irradiated seeds. Accumulating evidence indicates that there is some loss of nutritive value when gamma irradiation is used as a means of food preservation (Badshah and Klopfenstein 1988), just as there are losses with the much more widely used freezing, canning, or drying methods of spoilage prevention. However, losses from conventional preservation methods are well-documented (IFT 1986), whereas nutritional loss caused by irradiation has been much less studied. Our goal in the experiment described here was to determine the effects of gamma irradiation at levels known to effectively destroy insect infestations on the protein nutritional quality (amino acid profiles and available lysine) of wheat, maize, mung bean, and chickpea. The principal changes that have been shown to occur in proteincomponent amino acids are deamination, decarboxylation, and oxidation of sulfhydryl and aromatic groups (Urbain 1986, Delincee 1983). However, at the radiation doses commonly employed for food irradiation (up to 10 kGy), reported changes in protein nutritive value and amino acid profiles have been small (Delincee 1983).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation caused losses of lysine, tyrosine and isoleucine in all cultivars.

Taxon
Wheat, maize, chickpea, and mung beanCicer arietinumTriticum aestivumZea maysVigna radiatae0
Treatment
irradiatede0
Outcome
lysine, tyrosine, and isoleucinee1
Direction
lossese1
Comparator
Nonirradiated seedse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, maize, chickpea, and mung bean seeds were irradiated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“losses in all cultivars also were noted for lysine, tyrosine, and isoleucine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–327 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nonirradiated seeds served as”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available lysine percentage was higher in irradiated seeds.

Taxon
Wheat, maize, chickpea, and mung beanCicer arietinumTriticum aestivumZea maysVigna radiatae0
Treatment
irradiatede0
Outcome
percent available lysinee1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Nonirradiated seedse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, maize, chickpea, and mung bean seeds were irradiated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“the percent available lysine was higher in the irradiated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–474 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nonirradiated seeds served as”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur-containing amino acids were radiation labile, particularly in legumes.

Taxon
Wheat, maize, chickpea, and mung beanCicer arietinumTriticum aestivumZea maysVigna radiatae0
Treatment
irradiatede0
Outcome
amino acidse1
Direction
radiation labilee1
Qualifier
particularly in the legumese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, maize, chickpea, and mung bean seeds were irradiated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“amino acids were radiation labile, particularly in the legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“Comparison of amino acid profiles showed that sulfur-containing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–401 · show in text ↑

radiation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

25 papers: 16 positive, 9 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

radiation · molecular: metabolites · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

radiation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

radiation · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.