Paper · 2016 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of integrated phosphorus management on growth, yield and quality of lentil (Lens culinaris)

Mukesh Kumar Pandey; Ajay Verma; Pramod Kumar

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2012-13 and 2013-14 to study the effect of integrated phosphorus management on growth, yield and quality of lentil. The trial was laid out in split plot design assigning 8 treatments of three phosphorus levels (0, 40 and 80 Kg ha-1), three mode of PSB application (soil application, seed inoculation including control) and sulphur application of 20 Kg ha-1 with control. The crop was fertilized up to 80 Kg ha-1 of phosphorus application enhanced more growth, yield attributes, seed yield and protein yield than the 40 Kg ha-1 and control, however the initial plant population per running meter was remain non-significant during both the years. The PSB applied by seed inoculation and 20 Kg ha-1 sulphur application were showed similar effects. The economic value also calculated to judge best combination and found that the 80 Kg ha-1 phosphorus application, seed inoculation with PSB and 20 Kg ha-1 sulphur application received more net income (ha-1) and benefit cost ratio also.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus at 80 Kg ha-1 enhanced lentil growth relative to 40 Kg ha-1 and control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
80 Kg ha-1 of phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
40 Kg ha-1 and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crop was fertilized up to 80 Kg ha-1 of phosphorus application enhanced more growth, yield attributes, seed yield and protein yield than the 40 Kg ha-1 and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus at 80 Kg ha-1 enhanced yield attributes and seed yield relative to 40 Kg ha-1 and control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
80 Kg ha-1 of phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
yield attributes, seed yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
40 Kg ha-1 and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crop was fertilized up to 80 Kg ha-1 of phosphorus application enhanced more growth, yield attributes, seed yield and protein yield than the 40 Kg ha-1 and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus at 80 Kg ha-1 enhanced protein yield relative to 40 Kg ha-1 and control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
80 Kg ha-1 of phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
40 Kg ha-1 and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crop was fertilized up to 80 Kg ha-1 of phosphorus application enhanced more growth, yield attributes, seed yield and protein yield than the 40 Kg ha-1 and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial plant population did not differ significantly across phosphorus treatments.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
phosphorus managementt0
Outcome
initial plant population per running metere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“however the initial plant population per running meter was remain non-significant during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of integrated phosphorus management on growth, yield and quality of lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80 Kg ha-1 phosphorus, PSB seed inoculation and 20 Kg ha-1 sulfur combination gave more net income and benefit cost ratio.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
net income (ha-1) and benefit cost ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The economic value also calculated to judge best combination and found that the 80 Kg ha-1 phosphorus application, seed inoculation with PSB and 20 Kg ha-1 sulphur application received more net income (ha-1) and benefit cost ratio also.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

phosphorus · pest · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.