Paper · 1978 · Weed Science

Comparative Toxicity of Several Dinitroaniline Herbicides

T. N. Jordan; R. S. Baker; W. L. Barrentine

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Seven dinitroaniline herbicides were tested in the field for 3 yr at rates up to twice that normally used for annual grass control. Trifluralin ( α,α,α -trifluoro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine) and profluralin [ N -(cyclopropylmethyl)- α,α,α -trifluoro-2,6-dinitro- N -propyl- p -toluidine] gave 95 and 94% control of johnsongrass [ Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] from rhizomes, respectively, after the third year at the double rate. These two herbicides controlled johnsongrass from rhizomes better than nitralin [4-methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropylaniline], butralin [4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)- N -(1-methylpropyl)-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] and pendimethalin [ N -(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] at comparable rates. After 3 yr, seed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 213’) yields were higher with double rates of trifluralin, profluralin, fluchloralin [ N -(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro- N -propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline], and pendimethalin, than with nitralin, dinitramine (N 4 , N 4 -diethyl- α,α,α -trifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine), and butralin. In greenhouse studies, reduction of cotton raproot length by the dinitroaniline herbicides incorporated at the normal rate of use followed the order: butralin ≤ pendimethalin ≤ fluchloralin ≤ trifluralin < profluralin < dinitramine. All herbicides except pendimethalin at 0.28 and 0.56 kg/ha reduced lateral root production of cotton. The dinitroaniline herbicides at normal rates of use reduced fresh weight of cotton seedlings from 12 to 34%. The mean vapor toxicity of the dinitroaniline herbicides to Japanese millet [ Echinochloa crus-galli (Roxb.) Wight ‘frumentacea’] shoots averaged from no injury with oryzalin (3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide) and nitralin to 66% injury with dinitramine and trifluralin.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin at the double rate gave 95% control of johnsongrass from rhizomes after the third year.

Taxon
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee2
Treatment
Trifluraline1
Outcome
control of johnsongrasse2
Value
95e2
Qualifier
after the third year at the double ratee3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · TaxonMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Trifluralin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–143 · show in text ↑
e2

“gave 95 and 94% control of johnsongrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–341 · show in text ↑
e3

“after the third year at the double rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profluralin at the double rate gave 94% control of johnsongrass from rhizomes after the third year.

Taxon
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee2
Treatment
profluraline1
Outcome
control of johnsongrasse2
Value
94%e2
Qualifier
after the third year at the double ratee3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · TaxonMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“profluralin [”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–222 · show in text ↑
e2

“gave 95 and 94% control of johnsongrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–341 · show in text ↑
e3

“after the third year at the double rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin and profluralin controlled johnsongrass from rhizomes better than nitralin, butralin and pendimethalin at comparable rates.

Taxon
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee2
Treatment
These two herbicidese1
Outcome
controlled johnsongrass from rhizomese2
Direction
bettere2
Comparator
nitraline2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · TaxonMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“These two herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–464 · show in text ↑
e2

“controlled johnsongrass from rhizomes better than nitralin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yields after 3 years were higher with double rates of trifluralin, profluralin and fluchloralin than with nitralin.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume1
Material
Stoneville 213e1
Treatment
double rates of trifluralin, profluralin, fluchloraline1
Outcome
seed cottone1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
nitraline2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“seed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 213’) yields were higher with double rates of trifluralin, profluralin, fluchloralin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–896 · show in text ↑
e2

“than with nitralin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the greenhouse, reduction of cotton root length by the herbicides at normal use rate followed the order butralin <= pendimethalin <= fluchloralin <= trifluralin < profluralin < dinitramine.

Treatment
dinitroaniline herbicides incorporated at the normal rate of usee1
Outcome
reduction of cotton raproot lengthe1
Direction
butralin ≤ pendimethalin ≤ fluchloralin ≤ trifluralin < profluralin < dinitraminee1
Setting
greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In greenhouse studies, reduction of cotton raproot length by the dinitroaniline herbicides incorporated at the normal rate of use followed the order: butralin ≤ pendimethalin ≤ fluchloralin ≤ trifluralin < profluralin < dinitramine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicides except pendimethalin at 0.28 and 0.56 kg/ha reduced lateral root production of cotton.

Treatment
All herbicides except pendimethalin at 0.28 and 0.56 kg/hae1
Outcome
lateral root productione1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All herbicides except pendimethalin at 0.28 and 0.56 kg/ha reduced lateral root production of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dinitroaniline herbicides at normal rates of use reduced fresh weight of cotton seedlings by 12 to 34%.

Treatment
dinitroaniline herbicides at normal rates of usee1
Outcome
fresh weight of cotton seedlingse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
12 to 34%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The dinitroaniline herbicides at normal rates of use reduced fresh weight of cotton seedlings from 12 to 34%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vapor of dinitramine and trifluralin caused 66% injury to Japanese millet shoots.

Taxon
Japanese milletEchinochloa frumentaceae1
Treatment
dinitramine and trifluraline2
Outcome
injurye2
Value
66%e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinochloa frumentacea
Echinochloa frumentacea · TaxonJames Schnable · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mean vapor toxicity of the dinitroaniline herbicides to Japanese millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1626 · show in text ↑
e2

“66% injury with dinitramine and trifluralin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1790–1833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vapor of oryzalin and nitralin caused no injury to Japanese millet shoots.

Taxon
Japanese milletEchinochloa frumentaceae1
Treatment
oryzaline2
Outcome
injurye2
Direction
no injurye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinochloa frumentacea
Echinochloa frumentacea · TaxonJames Schnable · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mean vapor toxicity of the dinitroaniline herbicides to Japanese millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1626 · show in text ↑
e2

“no injury with oryzalin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1725 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

trifluralin · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

35 papers: 12 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

herbicide · control · Sorghum halepense (Johnson grass)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

herbicide · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 21 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

herbicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 123 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 123 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.