Paper · 2012 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Effects of nitrogen fertilization on grain yield and processing quality of different wheat genotypes

Liu Xin

19
claims
33
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of nitrogen(N) fertilization rates on grain yield and processing quality.Strong gluten wheat cultivars,Jimai 20 and Wanmai 38,and middle gluten wheat cultivars,Jingdong 8 and Zhongmai 8 were selected as test materials.The results show that within the range of N 0-360 kg/ha fertilizer levels,the increase of the amount of N-fertilizer could suppress chlorophyll's degrading,keep the N-content of flag at a high level,ease flag leaf senescence,and prolong the functional stage of flag.The chlorophyll and N contents of flag leaves of the strong gluten wheat cultivars are decreased slowly than those of the middle gluten wheat cultivars.The grain yields and protein contents are all increased with the increase of the N-fertilizer amounts,and reach their maxima under the treatment of applying nitrogen at N 270 kg/ha.When the nitrogen application rate reaches to 360 kg/ha,the grain yields and protein contents are decreased.The grain yields and protein contents of the strong gluten wheat cultivars are higher than those of the middle gluten wheat cultivars,while the spike numbers,grains per spike more and grain weight of the middle gluten wheat cultivars are higher.The nitrogen fertilization could increase flour yield,rigidity,protein content and sedimentation volume.The nitrogen treatment of 180 kg/ha can prolong the development time and stability time and decrease the water absorption,and the score of bread is highest.The hardness,protein content,flour yield and sedimentation value of strong gluten wheat are high,the dough development time and stability are long,and the bread bulky and score are high.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More nitrogen suppressed flag-leaf chlorophyll degradation.

Treatment
N-fertilizere0
Outcome
chlorophyll's degradinge0
Direction
suppresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of the amount of N-fertilizer could suppress chlorophyll's degrading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More nitrogen kept flag-leaf nitrogen content high.

Treatment
N-fertilizere0
Outcome
N-content of flage0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of the amount of N-fertilizer could suppress chlorophyll's degrading,keep the N-content of flag at a high level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–478 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More nitrogen eased flag-leaf senescence and prolonged its functional stage.

Treatment
N-fertilizere0
Outcome
flag leaf senescence,and prolong the functional stage of flage0
Direction
prolonge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of the amount of N-fertilizer could suppress chlorophyll's degrading,keep the N-content of flag at a high level,ease flag leaf senescence,and prolong the functional stage of flag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag-leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen declined more slowly in strong-gluten than middle-gluten cultivars.

Material
strong gluten wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
chlorophyll and N contents of flag leavese0
Direction
decreased slowlye0
Comparator
middle gluten wheat cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll and N contents of flag leaves of the strong gluten wheat cultivars are decreased slowly than those of the middle gluten wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield rose with N rates to a maximum at N 270 kg/ha.

Treatment
N 270 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yields and protein contents are all increased with the increase of the N-fertilizer amounts,and reach their maxima under the treatment of applying nitrogen at N 270 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein rose with N rates to a maximum at N 270 kg/ha.

Treatment
N 270 kg/hae0
Outcome
protein contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yields and protein contents are all increased with the increase of the N-fertilizer amounts,and reach their maxima under the treatment of applying nitrogen at N 270 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 360 kg/ha nitrogen, grain yields declined.

Treatment
360 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the nitrogen application rate reaches to 360 kg/ha,the grain yields and protein contents are decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 360 kg/ha nitrogen, grain protein contents declined.

Treatment
360 kg/hae0
Outcome
protein contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the nitrogen application rate reaches to 360 kg/ha,the grain yields and protein contents are decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strong-gluten cultivars had higher grain yields and protein than middle-gluten cultivars.

Material
strong gluten wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
grain yields and protein contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
middle gluten wheat cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yields and protein contents of the strong gluten wheat cultivars are higher than those of the middle gluten wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Middle-gluten cultivars had higher spike number, grains per spike and grain weight.

Material
middle gluten wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
spike numbers,grains per spike more and grain weighte0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spike numbers,grains per spike more and grain weight of the middle gluten wheat cultivars are higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased flour yield, rigidity and protein content.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
flour yield,rigidity,protein contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen fertilization could increase flour yield,rigidity,protein content and sedimentation volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1335 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased sedimentation volume.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
sedimentation volumee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen fertilization could increase flour yield,rigidity,protein content and sedimentation volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1335 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 180 kg/ha nitrogen treatment prolonged dough development and stability times.

Treatment
180 kg/hae0
Outcome
development time and stability timee0
Direction
prolonge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen treatment of 180 kg/ha can prolong the development time and stability time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 180 kg/ha nitrogen treatment decreased water absorption.

Treatment
180 kg/hae0
Outcome
water absorptione0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen treatment of 180 kg/ha can prolong the development time and stability time and decrease the water absorption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1457 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bread score was highest under 180 kg/ha nitrogen.

Treatment
180 kg/hae0
Outcome
score of breade0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen treatment of 180 kg/ha can prolong the development time and stability time and decrease the water absorption,and the score of bread is highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strong-gluten wheat had high hardness, protein content and flour yield.

Material
strong gluten wheate0
Outcome
hardness,protein content,flour yielde0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hardness,protein content,flour yield and sedimentation value of strong gluten wheat are high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1588 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strong-gluten wheat had high sedimentation value.

Material
strong gluten wheate0
Outcome
sedimentation valuee0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sedimentation value of strong gluten wheat are high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1588 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strong-gluten wheat had long dough development and stability times.

Outcome
dough development time and stabilitye0
Direction
longe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dough development time and stability are long”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strong-gluten wheat bread had high bulk and score.

Outcome
bread bulky and scoree0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bread bulky and score are high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

98 papers: 85 positive, 13 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 21 positive, 7 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 92 positive, 9 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.