Abstract
In 2006 in the areas along the Yangtze River soil-compacting and water-saving intermediate tests were carried on in the rice fields.The results showed that in the sand soil and the high penetration areas,by application of the water-saving irrigation technique,irrigation water was saved 24.1%,and the yield increased 10.1%.At the same time utilization of the technique had no significant impact on the number of fungi,bacteria and actinomyces in the rice root soil at different growth stages.After using the irrigation technique,urease activity in the dense layer of soil at rice jointing stage was higher than the control,and at heading stage the a-NA oxidation of rice root system was significantly improved.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Water saving irrigation saved 24.1% of irrigation water in sandy and permeable areas.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- water-saving irrigation techniquee0
- Outcome
- irrigation watere0
- Direction
- savede0
- Value
- 24.1%e0
- Qualifier
- sand soil and the high penetration arease0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in the sand soil and the high penetration areas,by application of the water-saving irrigation technique,irrigation water was saved 24.1%,and the yield increased 10.1%.”
t0“Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Water saving irrigation increased rice yield 10.1%.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- water-saving irrigation techniquee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 10.1%e0
- Qualifier
- sand soil and the high penetration arease0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in the sand soil and the high penetration areas,by application of the water-saving irrigation technique,irrigation water was saved 24.1%,and the yield increased 10.1%.”
t0“Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation had no significant impact on rice root soil fungi, bacteria and actinomycete numbers.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- the techniquee0
- Outcome
- number of fungi,bacteria and actinomyces in the rice root soile0
- Direction
- no significant impacte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“utilization of the technique had no significant impact on the number of fungi,bacteria and actinomyces in the rice root soil at different growth stages.”
Claim · model-written summary
Water saving irrigation raised soil urease activity at jointing relative to control.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Organ / stage
- jointing stagee0
- Treatment
- irrigation techniquee0
- Outcome
- urease activity in the dense layer of soile0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After using the irrigation technique,urease activity in the dense layer of soil at rice jointing stage was higher than the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Water saving irrigation significantly improved rice root a-NA oxidation at heading.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Organ / stage
- heading stagee0
- Treatment
- irrigation techniquee0
- Outcome
- a-NA oxidation of rice root systeme0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After using the irrigation technique,urease activity in the dense layer of soil at rice jointing stage was higher than the control,and at heading stage the a-NA oxidation of rice root system was significantly improved.”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
287 papers more in this group
See all 291 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
376 papers more in this group
See all 380 papers →irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
1,167 papers more in this group
See all 1,171 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.