Abstract
Aiming to research on the effect of tillering on plant height, ear height, stem diameter, dry plant weight, grain number,grain weight, grouting and yield in 2011-2012, we selected Xianyu 335 which had strong ability of tillering as the experiment material,different treatments of keeping and removing tillering were compared. The result showed that keeping tillering had no influence in plant height and ear height, and the main stem diameter had no changing. It also had no significant influence in dry plant weight, grain number,grain weight when the tillering wilt. But dry plant weight, grain number, grain weight were significant bigger than that of removing tillering and tillerng wilt when the tillering growed normally. In fact, the leaf of tillering could transferred organic to the ear of main stem. The yield of keeping tillering was significant higher than that of removing tillering.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Retaining tillers did not change plant height, ear height or main stem diameter.
- Treatment
- keeping tilleringe0
- Outcome
- plant height and ear height, and the main stem diametere0
- Direction
- no changinge0
- Comparator
- removing tilleringe1
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“keeping tillering had no influence in plant height and ear height, and the main stem diameter had no changing”
t0“Spring Maize”
e1“dry plant weight, grain number, grain weight were significant bigger than that of removing tillering and tillerng wilt when the tillering growed normally”
Claim · model-written summary
When tillers wilted, retaining them had no significant influence on dry plant weight, grain number or grain weight.
- Treatment
- keeping tilleringe2
- Outcome
- dry plant weight, grain number,grain weighte0
- Direction
- no significant influencee0
- Qualifier
- when the tillering wilte0
- Comparator
- removing tilleringe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It also had no significant influence in dry plant weight, grain number,grain weight when the tillering wilt.”
t0“Spring Maize”
e2“keeping tillering had no influence in plant height and ear height, and the main stem diameter had no changing”
e1“dry plant weight, grain number, grain weight were significant bigger than that of removing tillering and tillerng wilt when the tillering growed normally”
Claim · model-written summary
Normal tiller growth significantly increased dry plant weight, grain number and grain weight versus tiller removal and wilted tillers.
- Treatment
- tillering growed normallye0
- Outcome
- dry plant weight, grain number, grain weighte0
- Direction
- biggere0
- Comparator
- removing tillering and tillerng wilte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dry plant weight, grain number, grain weight were significant bigger than that of removing tillering and tillerng wilt when the tillering growed normally”
t0“Spring Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Tiller leaves transferred organic matter to the main stem ear.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the leaf of tillering could transferred organic to the ear of main stem”
t0“Spring Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Keeping tillers significantly increased yield relative to removing them.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield of keeping tillering was significant higher than that of removing tillering.”
t0“Spring Maize”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
279 papers more in this group
See all 283 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.