Paper · 2015 · Anhui Nongye Daxue xuebao

Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on root development in wheat

Bin Li

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Wheat seedlings inoculated with 24 plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria(PGPR) strains isolated from the rhizosphere of wheat, cotton, and rice were cultured in the semisolid medium or potting soil. Nine growth parameters of the root and stem were measured. In the semi-solid experiment, among 9 PGPR strains that significantly promoted the root dry weight, 7 promoted the total root length, 9 promoted the total root surface area, 5 increased the number of root tips, 8 increased the number of lateral roots and the stem height, and 7 improved the stem dry weight. In the pot experiment, in 10 PGPR strains that significantly promoted the dry weight of root, 10 promoted the total root length and total root surface area, 6 increased the number of root tips, 8 increased the number of lateral roots, 9 promoted the height of stem, and 7 enhanced the dry weight of stem. Five strains showed more than 5 significant growth-promoting parameters in both semisolid and pot experiment, among which 4 strains were Pseudomonas spp., indicating that Pseudomonas had better growth-promoting effects on wheat growth. PGPRs promoted the total length of the root,total surface area of the root,the number of root tips and lateral roots significantly.These parameters had significant correlations with the root dry weight, stem height and stem dry weight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine PGPR strains significantly promoted root dry weight in semisolid culture.

Treatment
PGPR strainse0
Interactor
PGPR strainse0symbiont
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
promotede0
Value
9 PGPR strainse0
Setting
semi-solid experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the semi-solid experiment, among 9 PGPR strains that significantly promoted the root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In semisolid culture seven strains promoted root length.

Treatment
7e0
Outcome
total root lengthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“7 promoted the total root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In semisolid culture nine strains promoted root surface area.

Treatment
9e0
Outcome
total root surface areae0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“9 promoted the total root surface area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In semisolid culture five strains increased root tip number.

Outcome
number of root tipse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“5 increased the number of root tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In semisolid culture eight strains increased lateral root number and stem height.

Outcome
number of lateral roots and the stem heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“8 increased the number of lateral roots and the stem height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In semisolid culture seven strains improved stem dry weight.

Outcome
stem dry weighte0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“7 improved the stem dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In pots ten strains significantly promoted root dry weight.

Treatment
PGPR strainse0
Interactor
PGPR strainse0symbiont
Outcome
dry weight of roote0
Direction
promotede0
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the pot experiment, in 10 PGPR strains that significantly promoted the dry weight of root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pots ten strains promoted total root length and surface area.

Outcome
total root length and total root surface areae0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“10 promoted the total root length and total root surface area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pots six strains increased root tip number.

Outcome
number of root tipse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“6 increased the number of root tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pots eight strains increased lateral root number.

Outcome
number of lateral rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“8 increased the number of lateral roots, 9 promoted the height of stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pots nine strains promoted stem height.

Outcome
height of steme0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“9 promoted the height of stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pots seven strains enhanced stem dry weight.

Outcome
dry weight of steme0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“7 enhanced the dry weight of stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–868 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Five strains had more than five significant growth parameters in both culture settings.

Outcome
growth-promoting parameterse0
Value
more than 5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“Five strains showed more than 5 significant growth-promoting parameters in both semisolid and pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–978 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four of the five strong growth promoting strains were Pseudomonas spp.

Interactor
Pseudomonas spp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
better growth-promoting effectse0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“among which 4 strains were Pseudomonas spp., indicating that Pseudomonas had better growth-promoting effects on wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1104 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length, surface area, tip number and lateral root number correlated significantly with root dry weight, stem height and stem dry weight.

Organ / stage
roote1
Outcome
root dry weight, stem height and stem dry weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“These parameters had significant correlations with the root dry weight, stem height and stem dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1340 · show in text ↑
e1

“PGPRs promoted the total length of the root,total surface area of the root,the number of root tips and lateral roots significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1236 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.