Paper · 2012 · Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica

Effects of Coupling of Precise Straw-return and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Characteristics after Anthesis and Yield of Winter Wheat

Lin Qi

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to determine the wheat straw residue amount and the nitrogen fertilizer amount in the dry land,different amounts of straws returned to field and nitrogen treatments were set up in Qingdao agriculture university Jiaozhou experiment stations.We researched the effects of precise straw returned quantity and nitrogen fertilizer treatments on winter wheat photosynthetic characteristics and yield.The results showed that compared with only nitrogen fertilizer treatment,right amounts of straws returned to field can improve winter wheat chlorophyll SPAD value obviously,delay senescence of flag leaf,improve the photosynthetic performance of flag leaf and increase the 1000-seed weight.In the same level of the straw returned to N2 level of the flag leaf senescence winter wheat slowly,and photosynthesis prolonged,the yield was increased significantly.Straw returned 9 000 kg/ha(J3)under 225 kg/ha(N2) nitrogen can delay senescence of flag leaf,improve the photosynthetic performance of flag leaf,reduce stomatal conductance and increase the 1000-seed weight obviously compared with other process,however,wheat straw reduced the wheat effective panicles.The experimental results showed that straw returned 9 000 kg/ha under 225 kg/ha nitrogen dosage had the most obvious effect on improving photosynthesis of flag leaves.So the N2J3 treatment is the optimal choice in the locality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriate straw return improved flag-leaf chlorophyll SPAD value relative to nitrogen alone.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
right amounts of straws returned to fielde0
Outcome
chlorophyll SPAD valuee0
Direction
improvee0
Comparator
only nitrogen fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with only nitrogen fertilizer treatment,right amounts of straws returned to field can improve winter wheat chlorophyll SPAD value obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriate straw return delayed flag-leaf senescence and improved photosynthetic performance.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
right amounts of straws returned to fielde0
Outcome
senescence of flag leaf,improve the photosynthetic performance of flag leafe0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“right amounts of straws returned to field can improve winter wheat chlorophyll SPAD value obviously,delay senescence of flag leaf,improve the photosynthetic performance of flag leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriate straw return increased 1000-seed weight.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
right amounts of straws returned to fielde0
Outcome
1000-seed weighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“right amounts of straws returned to field can improve winter wheat chlorophyll SPAD value obviously,delay senescence of flag leaf,improve the photosynthetic performance of flag leaf and increase the 1000-seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At N2 nitrogen, straw return slowed flag-leaf senescence and prolonged photosynthesis.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N2 levele0
Outcome
flag leaf senescence winter wheat slowly,and photosynthesis prolongede0
Direction
prolongede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the same level of the straw returned to N2 level of the flag leaf senescence winter wheat slowly,and photosynthesis prolonged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increased significantly at N2 nitrogen with straw return.

Treatment
N2e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the same level of the straw returned to N2 level of the flag leaf senescence winter wheat slowly,and photosynthesis prolonged,the yield was increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

J3 straw return at N2 nitrogen delayed flag-leaf senescence.

Treatment
Straw returned 9 000 kg/ha(J3)under 225 kg/ha(N2) nitrogene0
Outcome
senescence of flag leafe0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw returned 9 000 kg/ha(J3)under 225 kg/ha(N2) nitrogen can delay senescence of flag leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

J3 at N2 improved flag-leaf photosynthetic performance.

Treatment
Straw returned 9 000 kg/ha(J3)under 225 kg/ha(N2) nitrogene0
Outcome
photosynthetic performance of flag leafe0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw returned 9 000 kg/ha(J3)under 225 kg/ha(N2) nitrogen can delay senescence of flag leaf,improve the photosynthetic performance of flag leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

J3 at N2 reduced stomatal conductance.

Treatment
Straw returned 9 000 kg/ha(J3)under 225 kg/ha(N2) nitrogene0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw returned 9 000 kg/ha(J3)under 225 kg/ha(N2) nitrogen can delay senescence of flag leaf,improve the photosynthetic performance of flag leaf,reduce stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

J3 at N2 increased 1000-seed weight compared with other treatments.

Treatment
Straw returned 9 000 kg/ha(J3)under 225 kg/ha(N2) nitrogene0
Outcome
1000-seed weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
other processe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw returned 9 000 kg/ha(J3)under 225 kg/ha(N2) nitrogen can delay senescence of flag leaf,improve the photosynthetic performance of flag leaf,reduce stomatal conductance and increase the 1000-seed weight obviously compared with other process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw reduced effective panicles.

Treatment
wheat strawe0
Outcome
effective paniclese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat straw reduced the wheat effective panicles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1159 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

N2J3 was recommended as the local optimal choice.

Outcome
N2J3 treatment is the optimal choicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“So the N2J3 treatment is the optimal choice in the locality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 21 positive, 7 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 98 positive, 22 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

organic · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.