Paper · 2011

Study on cultivation practices for flue-cured tobacco variety T29 introduced from Zimbabwe

Jianmin Zeng

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of nitrogen application rates,number of leaves,topping time and remaining leaves stalk position on economic indexes of Zimbabwe introduced flue-cured tobacco variety T29 were investigated.Results showed that no significant interaction effect existed between remaining leaves and nitrogen in main economic traits.Both cured leaf yield and commercial value were not significantly affected by nitrogen and remaining leaves treatments.No significant effects existed by nitrogen on class grade percentage,middle class grade percentage,grade index and 100-leaf weight.Class grade percentage and 100-leaf weight dropped in the treatment of 24 remaining leaves per plant.Topping at flower-bud appearing stage resulted in the greatest commercial value,class grade percentage and grade index.It is suggested that the production practices for T29 under middle soil quality condition were as follows:N application between 60.0 kg/hm~2 and 90.0 kg/hm~2,topping at flower-bud appearing stage with 21 remaining leaves per plant,and keeping remaining leaf stalk position from 5th to 26th.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Remaining leaves and nitrogen had no significant interaction on main economic traits.

Taxon
tobacco variety T29Nicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
remaining leaves and nitrogene0
Outcome
main economic traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant interaction effect existed between remaining leaves and nitrogen in main economic traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–319 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco variety T29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and remaining-leaf treatments did not significantly affect cured leaf yield or commercial value.

Taxon
tobacco variety T29Nicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
nitrogen and remaining leaves treatmentse0
Outcome
cured leaf yield and commercial valuee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both cured leaf yield and commercial value were not significantly affected by nitrogen and remaining leaves treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–438 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco variety T29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen did not significantly affect grade percentages, grade index or 100-leaf weight.

Taxon
tobacco variety T29Nicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
class grade percentage,middle class grade percentage,grade indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant effects existed by nitrogen on class grade percentage,middle class grade percentage,grade index and 100-leaf weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco variety T29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Retaining 24 leaves lowered class grade percentage and 100-leaf weight.

Taxon
tobacco variety T29Nicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
24 remaining leaves per plante0
Outcome
Class grade percentage and 100-leaf weighte0
Direction
droppede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Class grade percentage and 100-leaf weight dropped in the treatment of 24 remaining leaves per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco variety T29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping at the flower-bud stage gave the greatest commercial value, class grade percentage and grade index.

Taxon
tobacco variety T29Nicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
Topping at flower-bud appearing stagee0
Outcome
commercial value,class grade percentage and grade indexe0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topping at flower-bud appearing stage resulted in the greatest commercial value,class grade percentage and grade index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco variety T29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 60–90 kg/hm2 nitrogen, topping at flower bud, 21 leaves, and leaf positions five through 26 for T29.

Taxon
T29t0
Outcome
N application between 60.0 kg/hm~2 and 90.0 kg/hm~2,topping at flower-bud appearing stage with 21 remaining leaves per plant,and keeping remaining leaf stalk position from 5th to 26the0

Verbatim

e0

“N application between 60.0 kg/hm~2 and 90.0 kg/hm~2,topping at flower-bud appearing stage with 21 remaining leaves per plant,and keeping remaining leaf stalk position from 5th to 26th”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“T29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–65 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

103 papers: 85 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

pruning · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 23 positive, 4 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 35 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.