Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Ecology

EFFECTS OF ROW SPACING IN WINTER WHEAT ON CANOPY STRUCTURE AND MICROCLIMATE IN LATER GROWTH STAGE

Yang Wen

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Aims Row spacing is a cultivation technique used for many field crops,but not wheat,for which traditional row spacing of 20 cm is used regardless of spike-type wheat cultivar.Our objective was to examine the effects of row spacing on canopy structure,its microclimate and yield in heavy-ear winter wheat,Triticum aestivum.Methods We conducted a field experiment on the farm of National Engineering Research Center for Wheat,Zhengzhou,China,using heavy-ear winter wheat cultivar `Lankao Aizao 8'.Three row spacing treatments(15,20 and 30 cm)were used in a randomized complete block arrangement with three replications.Important findings Leaf area index decreased and canopy openness increased with increased row spacing.Moreover,light interception at different layers,extinction coefficient,and relative humidity decreased,canopy temperature at each layer increased,and the spread of carbon dioxide was unchanged.Yield could be increased by reducing row spacing to have an even plant-to-plant distribution that could weaken competition.Our finding that 15 cm row spacing was beneficial to canopy structure and yield indicated that heavy-ear winter wheat cultivar `Lankao Aizao 8' should not be planted in conventional 20 cm row spacing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index decreased with wider rows.

Treatment
increased row spacinge0
Outcome
Leaf area indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index decreased and canopy openness increased with increased row spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy openness increased with wider rows.

Treatment
increased row spacinge0
Outcome
canopy opennesse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index decreased and canopy openness increased with increased row spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light interception, extinction coefficient and relative humidity decreased with wider rows.

Outcome
light interception at different layers,extinction coefficient,and relative humiditye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light interception at different layers,extinction coefficient,and relative humidity decreased,canopy temperature at each layer increased,and the spread of carbon dioxide was unchanged.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy temperature increased with wider rows.

Outcome
canopy temperature at each layere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canopy temperature at each layer increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon dioxide spread was unchanged with wider rows.

Outcome
spread of carbon dioxidee0
Direction
unchangede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spread of carbon dioxide was unchanged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing row spacing could increase wheat yield.

Treatment
reducing row spacinge0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield could be increased by reducing row spacing to have an even plant-to-plant distribution that could weaken competition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–38 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend against conventional 20 cm spacing for Lankao Aizao 8.

Material
Lankao Aizao 8e0
Outcome
should not be planted in conventional 20 cm row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heavy-ear winter wheat cultivar `Lankao Aizao 8' should not be planted in conventional 20 cm row spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1235 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 81 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.