Paper · 2005 · Gansu Nongye Daxue xuebao

Effect of Si fertilizer on yield of alfalfa (cv. Ameristand 201)

Tian Fu-ping; Zihe Zhang; Zixuan Chen; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Silicon fertilizer raised leaf fresh weight, leaf dry weight and inflorescence weight. The fresh and dry grass productions were increased by 16.4 %and 24.1 %, respectively; however, stem weight had no effect. When used during mature stage, Silicon increased significantly the stem dry weight and the root number. A pot trial showed that Si had not effected on seed yield of first year; however, significantly increased thousand-seed weight by 29 %.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer raised leaf fresh weight, leaf dry weight and inflorescence weight of alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
Ameristand 201t0
Treatment
Silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
leaf fresh weight, leaf dry weight and inflorescence weighte0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of alfalfa (cv. Ameristand 201)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Silicon fertilizer raised leaf fresh weight, leaf dry weight and inflorescence weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer increased fresh grass production of alfalfa by 16.4 %.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
grass productionse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
16.4 %e1
Qualifier
freshe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of alfalfa (cv. Ameristand 201)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Silicon fertilizer raised leaf fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
e1

“The fresh and dry grass productions were increased by 16.4 %and 24.1 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer increased dry grass production of alfalfa by 24.1 %.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
grass productionse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
24.1 %e1
Qualifier
drye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of alfalfa (cv. Ameristand 201)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Silicon fertilizer raised leaf fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
e1

“The fresh and dry grass productions were increased by 16.4 %and 24.1 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer had no effect on alfalfa stem weight.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
stem weighte2
Direction
had no effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of alfalfa (cv. Ameristand 201)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Silicon fertilizer raised leaf fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“however, stem weight had no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon applied during the mature stage significantly increased stem dry weight and root number of alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
mature stagee3
Treatment
Silicone3
Outcome
stem dry weight and the root numbere3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of alfalfa (cv. Ameristand 201)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
e3

“When used during mature stage, Silicon increased significantly the stem dry weight and the root number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon had no effect on seed yield of alfalfa in the first year of a pot trial.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Sie4
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
had not effectede4
Qualifier
first yeare4
Setting
pot triale4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of alfalfa (cv. Ameristand 201)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
e4

“A pot trial showed that Si had not effected on seed yield of first year; however, significantly increased thousand-seed weight by 29 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon significantly increased thousand-seed weight of alfalfa by 29 % in a pot trial.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Sie4
Outcome
thousand-seed weighte4
Direction
increasede4
Value
29 %e4
Setting
pot triale4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of alfalfa (cv. Ameristand 201)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
e4

“A pot trial showed that Si had not effected on seed yield of first year; however, significantly increased thousand-seed weight by 29 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–447 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

89 papers: 71 positive, 18 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.