Paper · 2014 · Zhongguo shucai

Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and PGPR Combination Agents on Growth and Defense Enzyme Activity of Cucumber under Low Temperature Stress

Han Ya-na

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to select the best combination of arbuscular mycorrhizal(AM) fungi and plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria(PGPR) for cucumber(Cucumis sativus)to resist low-temperature damages,we studied the effects of different combinations on growth and defense enzymes in greenhouse under low temperature stress conditions. The results showed that the growth of cucumber and SOD,POD,CAT activities were higher than that of the non-vaccinated control,while MDA content was significantly lower than that of the controls,when inoculation with AM fungi or PGPR under low temperature treatments. Between the AM fungi inoculation treatments,Glomus versiforme had better positive effect on growth,defensive enzyme activities,and decreased the cell membrane damage. Between the PGPR inoculation treatments,Paenibacillus polymyxa had better growth and higher defensive enzyme activities,with less cell membrane damage. Among the inoculation treatments with AM fungi and PGPR,inoculation treatment with both Glomus versiforme and Paenibacillas polymyxa had the best growth,highest defensive enzyme activities,minimum cell membrane damage. Hence,we would suggest to add this combination in greenhouse cucumber production to promote cucumber growth and improve plant cold resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi increased cucumber growth and defense enzymes under cold stress.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
inoculation with AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
growth of cucumber and SOD,POD,CAT activitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-vaccinated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of cucumber and SOD,POD,CAT activities were higher than that of the non-vaccinated control,while MDA content was significantly lower than that of the controls,when inoculation with AM fungi or PGPR under low temperature treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR increased cucumber growth and defense enzymes under cold stress.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
inoculation with AM fungi or PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
growth of cucumber and SOD,POD,CAT activitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-vaccinated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of cucumber and SOD,POD,CAT activities were higher than that of the non-vaccinated control,while MDA content was significantly lower than that of the controls,when inoculation with AM fungi or PGPR under low temperature treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi lowered MDA content under cold stress.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
inoculation with AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDA content was significantly lower than that of the controls,when inoculation with AM fungi or PGPR under low temperature treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR lowered MDA content under cold stress.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
inoculation with AM fungi or PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDA content was significantly lower than that of the controls,when inoculation with AM fungi or PGPR under low temperature treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus versiforme gave better growth and defense enzyme activity among AM fungi treatments.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Glomus versiformee0
Interactor
Glomus versiformeDiversispora versiformise0symbiont
Outcome
growth,defensive enzyme activitiese0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glomus versiforme had better positive effect on growth,defensive enzyme activities,and decreased the cell membrane damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus versiforme decreased membrane damage.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Glomus versiformee0
Interactor
Glomus versiformeDiversispora versiformise0symbiont
Outcome
cell membrane damagee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glomus versiforme had better positive effect on growth,defensive enzyme activities,and decreased the cell membrane damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paenibacillus polymyxa gave better growth and defense enzyme activity among PGPR treatments.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Paenibacillus polymyxae0
Interactor
Paenibacillus polymyxaPaenibacillus polymyxae0symbiont
Outcome
growth and higher defensive enzyme activitiese0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Paenibacillus polymyxa
Paenibacillus polymyxa · InteractorDr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paenibacillus polymyxa had better growth and higher defensive enzyme activities,with less cell membrane damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paenibacillus polymyxa reduced membrane damage.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Paenibacillus polymyxae0
Interactor
Paenibacillus polymyxaPaenibacillus polymyxae0symbiont
Outcome
cell membrane damagee0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Paenibacillus polymyxa
Paenibacillus polymyxa · InteractorDr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paenibacillus polymyxa had better growth and higher defensive enzyme activities,with less cell membrane damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation gave the best growth and highest defense enzyme activity.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
both Glomus versiforme and Paenibacillas polymyxae0
Interactor
Glomus versiformeDiversispora versiformise0symbiont
Second interactor
Paenibacillas polymyxae0symbiont
Outcome
growth,highest defensive enzyme activitiese0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation treatment with both Glomus versiforme and Paenibacillas polymyxa had the best growth,highest defensive enzyme activities,minimum cell membrane damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation minimized membrane damage.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
both Glomus versiforme and Paenibacillas polymyxae0
Interactor
Glomus versiformeDiversispora versiformise0symbiont
Second interactor
Paenibacillas polymyxae0symbiont
Outcome
cell membrane damagee0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation treatment with both Glomus versiforme and Paenibacillas polymyxa had the best growth,highest defensive enzyme activities,minimum cell membrane damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined inoculation in greenhouse cucumber production.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
add this combination in greenhouse cucumber productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggest to add this combination in greenhouse cucumber production to promote cucumber growth and improve plant cold resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1265 · show in text ↑

Paenibacillus polymyxa · physiology: oxidative · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: oxidative · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.