Paper · 2016 · Journal of Science Foundation

Effect of Herbicide Dose and Water Management on Weed Control Efficiency and Yield Performance of Boro Rice

Md. Ranju Ahmed; Md. Nasimul Bari; M. Moynul Haque; et al.

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at the Experimental Farm of the Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Salna, Gazipur during November 2011 to May 2012 to determine the effect of pre-emergence herbicide Pretilachlor @ 75%, 100%, 125%, 150%, 175% and 200% of the recommended dose under two water management regime i.e. continuous flooding and field capacity on weed suppression and yield performance of Boro rice cv. BRRIdhan28. One weed free and one control (unweeded) treatment were also imposed for treatment comparison. The experiment was laid down in Split Plot design with three replications. Standard management practices for transplanted rice were followed. Continuous flooding was found to contribute better weed control efficiency than field capacity. At 60 DAT, the highest weed control efficiency of 65.75% was found in the treatment receiving Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dose under continuous flooding and the least (54.76%) was found in the treatment receiving 75% of the recommended dose under field capacity. Continuous flooding contributed to more tillers thanfield capacity, and herbicide up to 125% of the recommended dose enhanced tillering in rice. At 75DAT the highest number of tillers (17.53 hill-1) were found in the plots receiving Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dose under good water management (W1T3), while the lowest (11.10 hill-1) was recorded in W2T6 treatment receiving Pretilachlor @ 200% of the recommended dose under field capacity. The highest tiller mortality (27.90%) was observed in W1T3 treatment, whereas the least (8.06%) was observed in W2T5 treatment receiving the same herbicide @175% of the recommended dose under field capacity. Application of Pretilachlor at recommended dose under continuous flooding contributed to the highest crop dry matter production (1144.60g m-2) thus leading to the highest grain yield of 6.31 t ha-1 being followed by the treatment receiving Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dose under same water management yielding 5.95 t ha-1 along with the highest harvest index of 0.58. Results revealed that Pretilachlor at recommended dose might be considered as viable option for weed management in transplanted Boro rice cultivation for effective weed management and satisfactory grain yield provided that appropriate water management is adopted. Journal of Science Foundation 2014;12(2):39-46DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jsf.v12i2.27737

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice trial reported weed control efficiency for continuous flooding.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
field capacitye0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Continuous flooding was found to contribute better weed control efficiency than field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice trial reported weed control efficiency for Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dose.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Treatment
Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dosee0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
65.75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest weed control efficiency of 65.75% was found in the treatment receiving Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dose under continuous flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice trial reported weed control efficiency for 75% of the recommended dose.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Treatment
75% of the recommended dosee0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye1
Direction
leaste0
Value
54.76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“the least (54.76%) was found in the treatment receiving 75% of the recommended dose under field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1057 · show in text ↑
e1

“Continuous flooding was found to contribute better weed control efficiency than field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice trial reported tillers for Continuous flooding.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Treatment
Continuous floodinge0
Outcome
tillerse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
field capacitye0

Verbatim

t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Continuous flooding contributed to more tillers thanfield capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice trial reported tillering for herbicide up to 125% of the recommended dose.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Treatment
herbicide up to 125% of the recommended dosee0
Outcome
tilleringe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“herbicide up to 125% of the recommended dose enhanced tillering in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice trial reported number of tillers for Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dose.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Treatment
Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dosee0
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
17.53 hill-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest number of tillers (17.53 hill-1) were found in the plots receiving Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dose under good water management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice trial reported number of tillers for Pretilachlor @ 200% of the recommended dose.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Treatment
Pretilachlor @ 200% of the recommended dosee0
Outcome
number of tillerse1
Direction
loweste0
Value
11.10 hill-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“the lowest (11.10 hill-1) was recorded in W2T6 treatment receiving Pretilachlor @ 200% of the recommended dose under field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1509 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest number of tillers (17.53 hill-1) were found in the plots receiving Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dose under good water management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice trial reported tiller mortality for W1T3 treatment.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Treatment
W1T3 treatmente0
Outcome
tiller mortalitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
27.90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest tiller mortality (27.90%) was observed in W1T3 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice trial reported tiller mortality for herbicide @175% of the recommended dose.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Treatment
herbicide @175% of the recommended dosee0
Outcome
tiller mortalitye1
Direction
leaste0
Value
8.06%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“the least (8.06%) was observed in W2T5 treatment receiving the same herbicide @175% of the recommended dose under field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1717 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest tiller mortality (27.90%) was observed in W1T3 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice trial reported crop dry matter production for Pretilachlor at recommended dose under continuous flooding.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Treatment
Pretilachlor at recommended dose under continuous floodinge0
Outcome
crop dry matter productione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1144.60g m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of Pretilachlor at recommended dose under continuous flooding contributed to the highest crop dry matter production (1144.60g m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice trial reported grain yield for Pretilachlor at recommended dose under continuous flooding.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.31 t ha-1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest grain yield of 6.31 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–1916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice trial reported yielding for Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dose.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Treatment
Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dosee0
Outcome
yieldinge0
Value
5.95 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dose under same water management yielding 5.95 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1959–2051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice trial reported harvest index for Pretilachlor @ 125% of the recommended dose.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.58e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest harvest index of 0.58”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2063–2096 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Pretilachlor at the recommended dose with appropriate water management for Boro rice.

Taxon
Boro Ricee0
Treatment
Pretilachlor at recommended dosee0
Outcome
viable option for weed managemente0

Verbatim

e0

“Pretilachlor at recommended dose might be considered as viable option for weed management in transplanted Boro rice cultivation for effective weed management and satisfactory grain yield provided that appropriate water management is adopted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2120–2360 · show in text ↑

Pretilachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

141 papers: 133 positive, 8 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Pretilachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

150 papers: 147 positive, 3 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

herbicide · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

123 papers: 92 positive, 31 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.