Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Roots grown in waterlogged soil lost about double the oxygen radially compared with non-waterlogged roots at 23°C.

A claim from Radial Oxygen Losses from Intact Rice Roots as Affected by Distance from the Apex, Respiration and Waterlogging · 1971

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots grown in waterlogged soil lost about double the oxygen radially compared with non-waterlogged roots at 23°C.

Treatment
waterlogged soile1
Outcome
lossese1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Comparator
non‐waterlogged plantse1
Setting
23°Ce1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intact Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43
e1

“At 23°C losses from roots grown in waterlogged soil proved to be about double those from non‐waterlogged plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–240

Title

Radial Oxygen Losses from Intact Rice Roots as Affected by Distance from the Apex, Respiration and Waterlogging

W. ARMSTRONG Physiologia Plantarum 1971. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1971.tb01427.x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-680c50cd130bfa89918ba3f3c6182dd980a70ada92d01d6ce467075d125f6247 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this claim · 193 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

277 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.