Paper · 2000 · Plant Production Science

Dry Matter Production and Root System Development of Rice Cultivars under Fluctuating Soil Moisture

Dionisio M. Bañoc; Akira Yamauchi; Akihiko Kamoshita; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
60
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rice plants in the rainfed areas are mostly grown under fluctuating soil moisture. We examined responses in dry matter production, root development and water use to changing soil moisture in diverse rice cultivars. Rice plants were grown in polyvinyl chloride tubes under glasshouse conditions. Progressive drought right after planting greatly inhibited the shoot dry matter production, tiller development, nodal root development and water uptake in all cultivars tested. When the plants experienced soil submergence before being exposed to drought, all the cultivars exhibited higher dry matter production than their well-watered counterparts. Cultivar differences were clearly noted in the growth responses to rewatering after these plants were droughted. With well–watered control as basis, IRAT 109 and KDML 105 plants increased efficiency in converting available dry matter to increase their total root length by means of enhanced lateral root development. In the latter, however, the dry weight of roots also increased and so did root water uptake. In Dular, droughted plants did not show a clear response in terms of root development and water uptake to rewatering while its shoot growth was much more severely inhibited than the other cultivars. These findings suggest that phenotypic plasticity in the root system structure exhibited by promoted lateral root development and new nodal root production play a key role in the growth of rice under changing moisture level in the soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought after planting inhibited rice shoot dry matter production and water uptake.

Treatment
Progressive drought right after plantinge0
Outcome
shoot dry matter production, tiller development, nodal root development and water uptakee0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Progressive drought right after planting greatly inhibited the shoot dry matter production, tiller development, nodal root development and water uptake in all cultivars tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior submergence followed by drought raised rice dry matter production above well-watered counterparts.

Treatment
soil submergence before being exposed to droughte0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
well-watered counterpartse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the plants experienced soil submergence before being exposed to drought, all the cultivars exhibited higher dry matter production than their well-watered counterparts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice cultivars differed in growth responses to rewatering after drought.

Outcome
growth responses to rewateringe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar differences were clearly noted in the growth responses to rewatering after these plants were droughted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRAT 109 increased efficiency of dry matter conversion to root length through lateral root development.

Material
IRAT 109e0
Outcome
efficiency in converting available dry matter to increase their total root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
well–watered controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With well–watered control as basis, IRAT 109 and KDML 105 plants increased efficiency in converting available dry matter to increase their total root length by means of enhanced lateral root development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KDML 105 increased efficiency of dry matter conversion to root length through lateral root development.

Material
KDML 105e0
Outcome
efficiency in converting available dry matter to increase their total root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
well–watered controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With well–watered control as basis, IRAT 109 and KDML 105 plants increased efficiency in converting available dry matter to increase their total root length by means of enhanced lateral root development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KDML 105 root dry weight and root water uptake increased.

Material
KDML 105e1
Outcome
dry weight of rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the latter, however, the dry weight of roots also increased and so did root water uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“KDML 105”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dular root development and water uptake showed no clear response to rewatering after drought.

Material
Dulare0
Treatment
rewateringe0
Outcome
root development and water uptakee0
Direction
did not show a clear responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Dular, droughted plants did not show a clear response in terms of root development and water uptake to rewatering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dular shoot growth was inhibited more severely than other cultivars.

Material
Dulare1
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
more severely inhibitede0
Comparator
the other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its shoot growth was much more severely inhibited than the other cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1252 · show in text ↑
e1

“In Dular”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑

rewatering · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

92 papers: 30 positive, 62 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

drought · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

325 papers: 76 positive, 249 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 246 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

321 papers more in this group

See all 325 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.