Paper · 2015 · Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences

The Influence of Fertilizer Applicator on the Distribution of Soil Nutrients in Peach Tree Root Layers

YU Shixi

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To improve fertilizer use efficiency,fertilizer applicator fertilization was used as a simple fertilization method on fruit trees. This study was carried out to explore the influence of the ditch broadcast fertilization in the radial shape and fertilizer applicator on the changes of soil nutrient dynamic content,and the impact on the nutrient content of leaves,peach yields and qualities of 10-year-old late-maturing peach cultivar Chinese peach. The results showed that with the same amount of fertilizer,the soil content of potassium and available phosphorus under the treatment of 0 to 40 cm soil fertilization with the fertilizer applicator,was significantly higher than the ditch broadcast fertilization in the radial shape,the maximum increase was 46. 92% and 30. 0%,respectively,and no significant differences appeared compared to 40 ~ 60 cm soil; Each soil layer NH+4- N,NO-3- N content with fertilizer applicator fertilization was significantly higher than the ditch broadcast fertilization in the radial shape,and the maximum increase was 76. 44% and 48. 77%,respectively. Total contents of nitrogen and phosphorus in leaves increased with increasing amount of fertilizer. The difference between the same fertilized amounts was not observed significantly. With the same amount of fertilizer,fertilizer applicator had a positive effect on single fruit weight,fruit diameter,contents of soluble solids and fruit yield.So this study can provide a theoretical basis for fertilizer applicator fertilization increasing soil nutrient content and orchard efficient fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer applicator fertilization raised soil potassium content above ditch broadcast fertilization in the 0-40 cm layer, by up to 46.92%.

Material
Chinese peache0
Treatment
fertilizer applicatore1
Outcome
soil content of potassiume1
Direction
highere1
Value
46. 92%e1
Qualifier
0 to 40 cm soile1
Comparator
ditch broadcast fertilization in the radial shapee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10-year-old late-maturing peach cultivar Chinese peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–447 · show in text ↑
e1

“the soil content of potassium and available phosphorus under the treatment of 0 to 40 cm soil fertilization with the fertilizer applicator,was significantly higher than the ditch broadcast fertilization in the radial shape,the maximum increase was 46. 92% and 30. 0%,respectively,and no significant differences appeared compared to 40 ~ 60 cm soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer applicator fertilization raised soil available phosphorus above ditch broadcast fertilization in the 0-40 cm layer, by up to 30.0%.

Material
Chinese peache0
Treatment
fertilizer applicatore1
Outcome
available phosphoruse1
Direction
highere1
Value
30. 0%e1
Qualifier
0 to 40 cm soile1
Comparator
ditch broadcast fertilization in the radial shapee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10-year-old late-maturing peach cultivar Chinese peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–447 · show in text ↑
e1

“the soil content of potassium and available phosphorus under the treatment of 0 to 40 cm soil fertilization with the fertilizer applicator,was significantly higher than the ditch broadcast fertilization in the radial shape,the maximum increase was 46. 92% and 30. 0%,respectively,and no significant differences appeared compared to 40 ~ 60 cm soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer applicator fertilization raised soil NH4+-N content above ditch broadcast fertilization in each soil layer, by up to 76.44%.

Material
Chinese peache0
Treatment
fertilizer applicator fertilizatione2
Outcome
NH+4- Ne2
Direction
highere2
Value
76. 44%e2
Qualifier
Each soil layere2
Comparator
ditch broadcast fertilization in the radial shapee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10-year-old late-maturing peach cultivar Chinese peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–447 · show in text ↑
e2

“Each soil layer NH+4- N,NO-3- N content with fertilizer applicator fertilization was significantly higher than the ditch broadcast fertilization in the radial shape,and the maximum increase was 76. 44% and 48. 77%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer applicator fertilization raised soil NO3--N content above ditch broadcast fertilization in each soil layer, by up to 48.77%.

Material
Chinese peache0
Treatment
fertilizer applicator fertilizatione2
Outcome
NO-3- Ne2
Direction
highere2
Value
48. 77%e2
Qualifier
Each soil layere2
Comparator
ditch broadcast fertilization in the radial shapee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10-year-old late-maturing peach cultivar Chinese peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–447 · show in text ↑
e2

“Each soil layer NH+4- N,NO-3- N content with fertilizer applicator fertilization was significantly higher than the ditch broadcast fertilization in the radial shape,and the maximum increase was 76. 44% and 48. 77%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1083 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen and phosphorus contents in peach leaves increased with increasing fertilizer amount.

Organ / stage
leavese3
Treatment
increasing amount of fertilizere3
Outcome
Total contents of nitrogen and phosphorus in leavese3
Direction
increasede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10-year-old late-maturing peach cultivar Chinese peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–447 · show in text ↑
e3

“Total contents of nitrogen and phosphorus in leaves increased with increasing amount of fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1183 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The difference between the same fertilized amounts was not significant.

Outcome
difference between the same fertilized amountse4
Qualifier
not observed significantlye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10-year-old late-maturing peach cultivar Chinese peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–447 · show in text ↑
e4

“The difference between the same fertilized amounts was not observed significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1266 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer applicator fertilization had a positive effect on single fruit weight, fruit diameter and soluble solids content of peach at the same fertilizer amount.

Treatment
fertilizer applicatore5
Outcome
single fruit weight,fruit diameter,contents of soluble solidse5
Direction
increaseinferrede5
Qualifier
With the same amount of fertilizere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10-year-old late-maturing peach cultivar Chinese peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–447 · show in text ↑
e5

“With the same amount of fertilizer,fertilizer applicator had a positive effect on single fruit weight,fruit diameter,contents of soluble solids and fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer applicator fertilization had a positive effect on peach fruit yield at the same fertilizer amount.

Treatment
fertilizer applicatore5
Outcome
fruit yielde5
Direction
increaseinferrede5
Qualifier
With the same amount of fertilizere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10-year-old late-maturing peach cultivar Chinese peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–447 · show in text ↑
e5

“With the same amount of fertilizer,fertilizer applicator had a positive effect on single fruit weight,fruit diameter,contents of soluble solids and fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under fertilizer applicator fertilization in the 0-40 cm layer, soil potassium and available phosphorus did not differ significantly from the 40-60 cm layer.

Treatment
0 to 40 cm soil fertilization with the fertilizer applicatore1
Outcome
soil content of potassium and available phosphoruse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
40 ~ 60 cm soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10-year-old late-maturing peach cultivar Chinese peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–447 · show in text ↑
e1

“the soil content of potassium and available phosphorus under the treatment of 0 to 40 cm soil fertilization with the fertilizer applicator,was significantly higher than the ditch broadcast fertilization in the radial shape,the maximum increase was 46. 92% and 30. 0%,respectively,and no significant differences appeared compared to 40 ~ 60 cm soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–855 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

59 papers: 50 positive, 9 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.