Abstract
Peach branches is a by-product of peach industry. Making peach branch waste into peach branch organic fertilizer (PBOF) is a promising strategy of ecological utilization. In this study, the effects of PBOF on the yield and quality of peach fruit, chemical properties of bulk soil, and soil bacterial communities were investigated in a peach orchard. The results showed that the yield and sugar/acid ratio of two high-level PBOF treatments (SDH.4 and SKR.4) was higher than no fertilization treatment (CK), but there was no significant difference compared to the commercial organic fertilizer treatment (SYT.4). Moreover, the three fertilizer treatments increased soil nutrients such as soil organic matter (SOM) and available potassium (AK), compared to CK. Furthermore, PBOF increased the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria, and enhanced the soil bacterial co-occurrence pattern and the potential function of bacterial communities to degrade exogenous compounds. In addition, thanks to the local policy of encouraging the use of PBOF, the use cost of PBOF is lower than commercial organic fertilizer, which is conducive to the development of ecological agriculture.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Two high-level PBOF treatments had higher peach fruit yield than no fertilization.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- two high-level PBOF treatments (SDH.4 and SKR.4)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- no fertilization treatment (CK)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the yield and sugar/acid ratio of two high-level PBOF treatments (SDH.4 and SKR.4) was higher than no fertilization treatment (CK)”
t0“peach branch organic fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Two high-level PBOF treatments had a higher peach fruit sugar/acid ratio than no fertilization.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- two high-level PBOF treatments (SDH.4 and SKR.4)e0
- Outcome
- sugar/acid ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- no fertilization treatment (CK)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the yield and sugar/acid ratio of two high-level PBOF treatments (SDH.4 and SKR.4) was higher than no fertilization treatment (CK)”
t0“peach branch organic fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
PBOF fruit outcomes did not differ significantly from commercial organic fertilizer.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- PBOF treatmentse0
- Outcome
- yield and sugar/acid ratioe0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- commercial organic fertilizer treatment (SYT.4)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the yield and sugar/acid ratio of two high-level PBOF treatments (SDH.4 and SKR.4) was higher than no fertilization treatment (CK), but there was no significant difference compared to the commercial organic fertilizer treatment (SYT.4)”
t0“peach branch organic fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Three fertilizer treatments increased soil organic matter and available potassium relative to no fertilization.
- Treatment
- the three fertilizer treatmentse0
- Outcome
- soil organic matter (SOM) and available potassium (AK)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“the three fertilizer treatments increased soil nutrients such as soil organic matter (SOM) and available potassium (AK), compared to CK”
Claim · model-written summary
PBOF increased beneficial bacterial relative abundance.
- Taxon
- beneficial bacteriae0
- Treatment
- PBOFe0
- Outcome
- relative abundance of beneficial bacteriae0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“PBOF increased the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria”
Claim · model-written summary
PBOF enhanced the soil bacterial co-occurrence pattern and potential degradation function.
- Taxon
- bacterial communitiese0
- Treatment
- PBOFe0
- Outcome
- soil bacterial co-occurrence pattern and the potential function of bacterial communities to degrade exogenous compoundse0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“PBOF increased the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria, and enhanced the soil bacterial co-occurrence pattern and the potential function of bacterial communities to degrade exogenous compounds”
t0“peach branch organic fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
PBOF use costs less than commercial organic fertilizer under local policy.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“the use cost of PBOF is lower than commercial organic fertilizer”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →fertilization · soil: chemistry · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.