Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Effects of peach branch organic fertilizer on the soil microbial community in peach orachards

Chenyu Liu; Defeng Han; Haiqing Yang; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
12
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Peach branches is a by-product of peach industry. Making peach branch waste into peach branch organic fertilizer (PBOF) is a promising strategy of ecological utilization. In this study, the effects of PBOF on the yield and quality of peach fruit, chemical properties of bulk soil, and soil bacterial communities were investigated in a peach orchard. The results showed that the yield and sugar/acid ratio of two high-level PBOF treatments (SDH.4 and SKR.4) was higher than no fertilization treatment (CK), but there was no significant difference compared to the commercial organic fertilizer treatment (SYT.4). Moreover, the three fertilizer treatments increased soil nutrients such as soil organic matter (SOM) and available potassium (AK), compared to CK. Furthermore, PBOF increased the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria, and enhanced the soil bacterial co-occurrence pattern and the potential function of bacterial communities to degrade exogenous compounds. In addition, thanks to the local policy of encouraging the use of PBOF, the use cost of PBOF is lower than commercial organic fertilizer, which is conducive to the development of ecological agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two high-level PBOF treatments had higher peach fruit yield than no fertilization.

Treatment
two high-level PBOF treatments (SDH.4 and SKR.4)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no fertilization treatment (CK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield and sugar/acid ratio of two high-level PBOF treatments (SDH.4 and SKR.4) was higher than no fertilization treatment (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–504 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach branch organic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two high-level PBOF treatments had a higher peach fruit sugar/acid ratio than no fertilization.

Treatment
two high-level PBOF treatments (SDH.4 and SKR.4)e0
Outcome
sugar/acid ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no fertilization treatment (CK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield and sugar/acid ratio of two high-level PBOF treatments (SDH.4 and SKR.4) was higher than no fertilization treatment (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–504 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach branch organic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PBOF fruit outcomes did not differ significantly from commercial organic fertilizer.

Treatment
PBOF treatmentse0
Outcome
yield and sugar/acid ratioe0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
commercial organic fertilizer treatment (SYT.4)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield and sugar/acid ratio of two high-level PBOF treatments (SDH.4 and SKR.4) was higher than no fertilization treatment (CK), but there was no significant difference compared to the commercial organic fertilizer treatment (SYT.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach branch organic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three fertilizer treatments increased soil organic matter and available potassium relative to no fertilization.

Treatment
the three fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
soil organic matter (SOM) and available potassium (AK)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CKe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the three fertilizer treatments increased soil nutrients such as soil organic matter (SOM) and available potassium (AK), compared to CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–756 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBOF increased beneficial bacterial relative abundance.

Taxon
beneficial bacteriae0
Treatment
PBOFe0
Outcome
relative abundance of beneficial bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“PBOF increased the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBOF enhanced the soil bacterial co-occurrence pattern and potential degradation function.

Taxon
bacterial communitiese0
Treatment
PBOFe0
Outcome
soil bacterial co-occurrence pattern and the potential function of bacterial communities to degrade exogenous compoundse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“PBOF increased the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria, and enhanced the soil bacterial co-occurrence pattern and the potential function of bacterial communities to degrade exogenous compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach branch organic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBOF use costs less than commercial organic fertilizer under local policy.

Outcome
use cost of PBOFe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
commercial organic fertilizere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the use cost of PBOF is lower than commercial organic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1107 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

59 papers: 50 positive, 9 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.