Paper · 2002 · (牠丁文)acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sinica

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION ON NITROGEN UPTAKE OF WHEAT AND N BALANCE

Sheng Wang

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of different irrigation on nitrogen uptake of wheat and N balance were investgated with 15 N tracer technique.The results showed that the amount of nitrogen uptake of wheat and recovery of fertilizer N under high irrigation was higher,and the loss of fertilizer N was lower than that under low irrigation.Under high irrigation,the absorptio of 15 N fertilizer of wheat lasted longer,while 15 N fertilizer at jointing stage was absorbed mainly within 20 days after fertilizer application under low irrigation. 15 N fertilizer was lost largely soon after fertilizer application and the amount of 15 N fertilizer lost was higher under low irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High irrigation increased wheat nitrogen uptake relative to low irrigation.

Treatment
high irrigatione0
Outcome
nitrogen uptake of wheate0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
low irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“amount of nitrogen uptake of wheat and recovery of fertilizer N under high irrigation was higher,and the loss of fertilizer N was lower than that under low irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High irrigation increased recovery of fertilizer nitrogen.

Treatment
high irrigatione0
Outcome
recovery of fertilizer Ne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
low irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“amount of nitrogen uptake of wheat and recovery of fertilizer N under high irrigation was higher,and the loss of fertilizer N was lower than that under low irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High irrigation reduced fertilizer nitrogen loss.

Treatment
high irrigatione0
Outcome
loss of fertilizer Ne0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
low irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“amount of nitrogen uptake of wheat and recovery of fertilizer N under high irrigation was higher,and the loss of fertilizer N was lower than that under low irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat absorbed labeled fertilizer for longer under high irrigation.

Treatment
high irrigatione0
Outcome
absorptio of 15 N fertilizer of wheate0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
low irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under high irrigation,the absorptio of 15 N fertilizer of wheat lasted longer,while 15 N fertilizer at jointing stage was absorbed mainly within 20 days after fertilizer application under low irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–518 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low irrigation, jointing-stage labeled fertilizer was mostly absorbed within 20 days.

Organ / stage
jointing stagee0
Treatment
low irrigatione0
Outcome
15 N fertilizer at jointing stage was absorbede0
Value
20 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15 N fertilizer at jointing stage was absorbed mainly within 20 days after fertilizer application under low irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low irrigation produced greater early loss of labeled fertilizer.

Treatment
low irrigatione0
Outcome
amount of 15 N fertilizer loste0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15 N fertilizer was lost largely soon after fertilizer application and the amount of 15 N fertilizer lost was higher under low irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑

irrigation · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 14 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 74 positive, 29 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.