Paper · 2008

Preliminary Study on Cotton Growth Characteristics of Non-Film Transplantation of Subsurface Drip Irrigation in Xinjiang

Zhenhua Wang

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cotton transplantation without plastic film of subsurface drip irrigation(SDI) is put forward according to the increasingly serious pollution problem of the scrap plastic film in Xinjiang cotton field,the technique can develop the advantage both transplantation and SDI,the water use efficiency(WUE)can be raised,and the white pollution can be decelerated effectively,the meaning is important in arid regin.By a year pot experiment research,The results show that the boll opening stage of cotton of the transplantation without plastic film of SDI appeared over 10 days in advance than the seeding cotton with film of SDI or DI,the whole growth period prolongs,WUE raises and the yeld all more than others.The total water consumption of the cotton transplantation without plastic film of SDI is almost equal to the ones with plastic film,but the yield and the WUE are higher than it.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-film transplanted cotton under subsurface drip irrigation opened its bolls more than 10 days earlier than film-mulched cotton under SDI or DI.

Treatment
transplantation without plastic film of SDIe1
Outcome
boll opening stagee1
Direction
in advancee1
Value
over 10 dayse1
Comparator
seeding cotton with film of SDI or DIe1
Setting
pot experimente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results show that the boll opening stage of cotton of the transplantation without plastic film of SDI appeared over 10 days in advance than the seeding cotton with film of SDI or DI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–626 · show in text ↑
e5

“By a year pot experiment research”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-film transplanted cotton under subsurface drip irrigation prolonged the whole growth period.

Treatment
transplantation without plastic film of SDIe1
Outcome
whole growth periode2
Direction
prolongse2
Comparator
seeding cotton with film of SDI or DIe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results show that the boll opening stage of cotton of the transplantation without plastic film of SDI appeared over 10 days in advance than the seeding cotton with film of SDI or DI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–626 · show in text ↑
e2

“the whole growth period prolongs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-film transplanted cotton under subsurface drip irrigation raised water use efficiency compared with the other treatments.

Treatment
transplantation without plastic film of SDIe1
Outcome
WUEe3
Direction
raisese3
Comparator
otherse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results show that the boll opening stage of cotton of the transplantation without plastic film of SDI appeared over 10 days in advance than the seeding cotton with film of SDI or DI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–626 · show in text ↑
e3

“WUE raises and the yeld all more than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-film transplanted cotton under subsurface drip irrigation gave a higher yield than the other treatments.

Treatment
transplantation without plastic film of SDIe1
Outcome
yelde3
Direction
more than otherse3
Comparator
otherse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results show that the boll opening stage of cotton of the transplantation without plastic film of SDI appeared over 10 days in advance than the seeding cotton with film of SDI or DI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–626 · show in text ↑
e3

“WUE raises and the yeld all more than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total water consumption of non-film transplanted cotton under SDI was almost equal to that of film-mulched cotton.

Treatment
transplantation without plastic film of SDIe4
Outcome
total water consumptione4
Direction
almost equale4
Comparator
the ones with plastic filme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The total water consumption of the cotton transplantation without plastic film of SDI is almost equal to the ones with plastic film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–836 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 110 positive, 21 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

transplanting · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.