Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Transplanted cottononion cropping system gave irrigation water productivity of 1.16 kg/m3, greater than the direct sown system.

A claim from Methods of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) establishment and zinc fortification in cotton-based cropping systems: Direct and residual effect on onion (Allium cepa) and system productivity of cottononion cropping system · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted cottononion cropping system gave irrigation water productivity of 1.16 kg/m3, greater than the direct sown system.

Treatment
transplanted cottononion crop- ping systeme4
Outcome
irrigation water productivitye4
Direction
greatere4
Value
1.16 kg/m3e4
Comparator
direct sown cottononion systeme4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“sys- tem productivity in terms of seed cotton equivalent yield (9.45 t/ha), production efficiency (27.0 kg/ha/day), eco- nomic efficiency (736.9 /ha/day) and irrigation water productivity (1.16 kg/m3) of transplanted cottononion crop- ping system was significantly greater than the direct sown cottononion system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–2005
t0

“Methods of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38

Title

Methods of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) establishment and zinc fortification in cotton-based cropping systems: Direct and residual effect on onion (Allium cepa) and system productivity of cottononion cropping system

T. PAUL; D.S. RANA; T.K. DAS; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v60i3.4487

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-55a9d44d34ba07cdfd819379c8c8ec42750779020ff50492313d5aa86b4733fe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

transplanting · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.