Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Direct application of 5.0 kg Zn/ha gave onion gross and net returns significantly superior to control.

A claim from Methods of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) establishment and zinc fortification in cotton-based cropping systems: Direct and residual effect on onion (Allium cepa) and system productivity of cottononion cropping system · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct application of 5.0 kg Zn/ha gave onion gross and net returns significantly superior to control.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat1
Treatment
direct application of 5.0 kg Zn/hae2
Outcome
gross and net returnse2
Direction
superiore2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Onion produced statistically similar growth and yield attributes, bulb yield, gross and net returns and nutrient uptake, due to direct application of 5.0 kg Zn/ha and residual effect of 5.0 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha to cotton, which were significantly superior to control and residual effect of 2.5 kg Zn/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1228
t1

“effect on onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–159

Title

Methods of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) establishment and zinc fortification in cotton-based cropping systems: Direct and residual effect on onion (Allium cepa) and system productivity of cottononion cropping system

T. PAUL; D.S. RANA; T.K. DAS; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v60i3.4487

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-4092c7cf4fa4fd62f238fc0932e1d587ff5395128330a300efe4e96842621317 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
    FYM, NPK and sulfur, with or without boron and zinc, gave maximum bulb weight.

    Response of Onion to NPK, S and Micronutrients · 2020

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.