Paper · 2015 · Xi'nan nongye xuebao

Effects of Foliar Plant Growth Regulator Application on Rice Yield and Protective Enzyme Activities

Wen Xiang-chen

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to explore the effects of the foliar spray exogenous plant growth regulators on the yield and flag leaf protective enzyme activities during filling stage,in this experiment,two rice varieties( Xiangyaxiangzhan,Zengchengsimiao) were used as tested materials,and a field experiment was conducted by spraying gibberellin( GA treatment),Brassinolide( BR treatment) solvent and water( CK) in rice breach period. The results showed that compared to spraying water( CK Treatment),the rice yield was increased by GA and BR treatments,the rice yields of Xiangyaxiangzhan and Zengchengsimiao with GA increased by 15. 98 % and 4. 83 %,respectively,and with BR significantly increased by 6. 48 % and 9. 78 %,respectively; In the whole period of filling stage,Malondialdehyde( MDA) contents of GA and BR treatments were significantly lower than that of CK treatment; Catalase( CAT) activity during the early filling stage( 10 days after heading stage) and Peroxidase( POD) activity during the late filling stage( Maturity) of GA and BR treatments were higher than that of CK treatment; Their superoxide dismutase( SOD) of GA and BR treatments was highly active than that of CK treatment during the whole period of filling stage. In the late filling stage,the soluble sugar content of GA and BR treatments were higher than that of CK treatment and showed a sharp rise in maturity. It was concluded that a certain concentration of foliar plant growth regulators application could improve the rice yield and protective enzyme activities in filling stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA increased yield of Xiangyaxiangzhan by 15. 98 %.

Material
Xiangyaxiangzhane0
Treatment
GAe0
Outcome
rice yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15. 98 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rice yields of Xiangyaxiangzhan and Zengchengsimiao with GA increased by 15. 98 % and 4. 83 %,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA increased yield of Zengchengsimiao by 4. 83 %.

Material
Zengchengsimiaoe0
Treatment
GAe0
Outcome
rice yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4. 83 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rice yields of Xiangyaxiangzhan and Zengchengsimiao with GA increased by 15. 98 % and 4. 83 %,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BR significantly increased rice yield by 6. 48 % and 9. 78 % in the two varieties.

Treatment
BRe0
Outcome
increasede0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6. 48 % and 9. 78 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with BR significantly increased by 6. 48 % and 9. 78 %,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA and BR lowered malondialdehyde contents throughout filling.

Treatment
GA and BR treatmentse0
Outcome
Malondialdehyde( MDA) contentse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
CK treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Malondialdehyde( MDA) contents of GA and BR treatments were significantly lower than that of CK treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA and BR increased catalase activity early in filling and peroxidase activity late in filling.

Treatment
GA and BR treatmentse0
Outcome
Catalase( CAT) activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CK treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Catalase( CAT) activity during the early filling stage( 10 days after heading stage) and Peroxidase( POD) activity during the late filling stage( Maturity) of GA and BR treatments were higher than that of CK treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA and BR increased superoxide dismutase activity throughout filling.

Treatment
GA and BR treatmentse0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase( SOD)e0
Direction
highly activee0
Comparator
CK treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superoxide dismutase( SOD) of GA and BR treatments was highly active than that of CK treatment during the whole period of filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA and BR raised soluble sugar content late in filling, sharply by maturity.

Treatment
GA and BR treatmentse0
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CK treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soluble sugar content of GA and BR treatments were higher than that of CK treatment and showed a sharp rise in maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

60 papers: 56 positive, 4 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Gibberellic acid · physiology: oxidative · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Gibberellic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

brassinolide · physiology: osmolytes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Gibberellic acid · physiology: osmolytes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

brassinolide · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

brassinolide · physiology: oxidative · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.